Hidden blood loss during posterior spine fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterior spine fusion is associated with significant intra- and postoperative blood losses. When referring to the total blood loss during spine surgery, the standard is to measure the intraoperative bleeding plus the postoperative drainage. This ignores the "hidden" blood loss that was found to be significant in other fields of surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether posterior spine fusion carries a substantial hidden blood loss. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We prospectively studied 114 patients undergoing instrumented posterior spinal fusion at one center between January 2011 and April 2011. OUTCOME MEASURES: Total blood loss, visible blood loss, and hidden blood loss. METHODS: For each patient, the hidden blood loss was calculated by deducting the observed perioperative blood loss from the calculated total blood loss based on the hematocrit changes. We compared the percentage of the hidden blood loss out of the total blood loss for primary versus revision posterior spine fusion. RESULTS: Primary decompression and posterior fusion patients had a mean total true loss of 1,439 mL. Their calculated hidden loss was 600 mL, 42% of the total loss. After revision posterior spinal fusion surgery, the mean total blood loss was 1,606 mL. The mean visible loss was 975 mL, and the mean hidden loss was 631 mL, 39% of the total loss. Thus, there was no statistical difference in the hidden blood loss between primary and revision posterior spinal fusion surgeries (p>.05). We did not find a significant difference in the percentage of the hidden blood loss between patients who underwent one, two, or three or more levels of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: After posterior spinal fusion, there may be a large amount of the hidden blood loss.

Three-dimensional dynamic in vivo motion of the cervical spine: assessment of measurement accuracy and preliminary findings.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous research has quantified cervical spine motion with conventional measurement techniques (eg, cadaveric studies, motion capture systems, and fluoroscopy), but these techniques were not designed to accurately measure three-dimensional (3D) dynamic cervical spine motion under in vivo conditions. PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to characterize the accuracy of model-based tracking for measuring 3D dynamic cervical spine kinematics and to demonstrate its in vivo application. STUDY DESIGN: Through accuracy assessment and application of technique, in vivo cervical spine motion was measured. METHODS: The accuracy of model-based tracking for measuring cervical spine motion was determined in an in vitro experiment. Tantalum beads were implanted into the vertebrae of an ovine specimen, and biplane X-ray images were acquired as the specimen's neck was manually moved through neck extension and axial neck rotation. The 3D position and orientation of each cervical vertebra were determined from the biplane X-ray images using model-based tracking. For comparison, the position and orientation of each vertebra were also determined by tracking the position of the implanted beads with dynamic radiostereometric analysis. To demonstrate in vivo application of this technique, biplane X-ray images were acquired as a human subject performed two motion tasks: neck extension and axial neck rotation. The positions and orientations of each cervical vertebra were determined with model-based tracking. Cervical spine motion was reported with standard kinematic descriptions of translation and rotation. RESULTS: The in vitro validation demonstrated that model-based tracking is accurate to within +/-0.6 mm and +/-0.6 degrees for measuring cervical spine motion. For the in vivo application, there were significant rotations about all three anatomical axes for both the neck extension and axial neck rotation motion tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Model-based tracking is an accurate technique for measuring in vivo, 3D, dynamic cervical spine motion. Preliminary data acquired using this technique are in agreement with previous studies. It is anticipated that this experimental approach will enhance our understanding of cervical spine motion under normal and pathologic conditions.