The effect of exercise hyperpnea on gross efficiency and anaerobic capacity estimates during a 3-min cycle time trial.

This study aimed to analyze the effect of exercise-induced hyperpnea on gross efficiency (GE) and anaerobic capacity estimates during a self-paced 3-min supramaximal cycle time trial (TT). Fourteen highly trained male cyclists performed 7 × 4-min submaximal stages, a 6-min passive rest, a 3-min TT, a 5-min passive rest, and a 6-min submaximal stage. Three models were based on the 7 × 4-min linear regression extrapolation method, using 1) the conventional model (7-YLIN); 2) the same 7-YLIN model but correcting for the additional ventilatory cost (i.e., hyperpnea) (7-YLIN-V-cor); and 3) accounting for linearly declining GE during the TT (7-YLIN-D). The other three models were based on GE from the last submaximal stage, using the conventional model (GELAST) and the same modifications as described for 7+YLIN, i.e., 1) GELAST, 2) GELAST-V-cor, and 3) GELAST-D. The GELAST model generated 18% higher values of anaerobic capacity than the 7-YLIN model (P < 0.05). During the TT, the hyperpnea-corrected model (i.e., 7-YLIN-V-cor or GELAST-V-cor) generated, compared with the respective conventional model (i.e., 7-YLIN or GELAST), ∼0.7 percentage points lower GE and ∼11% higher anaerobic capacity (all, P < 0.05). The post-TT GE was 1.9 percentage points lower (P < 0.001) and the 7-YLIN-D or GELAST-D model generated, compared with the respective conventional model, a lower GE (∼1.0 percentage points) and ∼17% higher anaerobic capacity during the TT (all, P < 0.05). In conclusion, the correction for a declining GE due to hyperpnea during a supramaximal TT resulted in an increased required total metabolic rate and anaerobic energy expenditure compared with the conventional models.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study demonstrates that GE declines during a 3-min supramaximal cycle TT, which is possibly related to the hyperpneic response during supramaximal exercise. The finding from this study also provides novel insight into how the increased ventilatory energy cost from exercise-induced hyperpnea contributes to decreased GE, increased required total metabolic rate, and increased anaerobic energy expenditure during supramaximal exercise. Therefore, conventional linear models for estimating anaerobic capacity are likely to generate underestimated values.

Anaerobic work capacity in cycling: the effect of computational method.

PURPOSE: To compare the anaerobic work capacity (AnWC, i.e., attributable anaerobic mechanical work) assessed using four different approaches/models applied to time-trial (TT) cycle-ergometry exercise. METHODS: Fifteen male cyclists completed a 7 × 4-min submaximal protocol and a 3-min all-out TT (TTAO). Linear relationships between power output (PO) and submaximal metabolic rate were constructed to estimate TT-specific gross efficiency (GE) and AnWC, using either a measured resting metabolic rate as a Y-intercept (7 + YLIN) or no measured Y-intercept (7-YLIN). In addition, GE of the last submaximal bout (GELAST) was used to estimate AnWC, and critical power (CP) from TTAO (CP3´AO) was used to estimate mechanical work above CP (W', i.e., "AnWC"). RESULTS: Average PO during TTAO was 5.43 ± 0.30 and CP was 4.48 ± 0.23 W∙kg-1. The TT-associated GE values were ~ 22.0% for both 7 + YLIN and 7-YLIN and ~ 21.1% for GELAST (both P < 0.001). The AnWC were 269 ± 60, 272 ± 55, 299 ± 61, and 196 ± 52 J∙kg-1 for the 7 + YLIN, 7-YLIN, GELAST, and CP3´AO models, respectively (7 + YLIN and 7-YLIN versus GELAST, both P < 0.001; 7 + YLIN, 7-YLIN, and GELAST versus CP3´AO, all P < 0.01). For the three pair-wise comparisons between 7 + YLIN, 7-YLIN, and GELAST, typical errors in AnWC values ranged from 7 to 11 J∙kg-1, whereas 7 + YLIN, 7-YLIN, and GELAST versus CP3´AO revealed typical errors of 55-59 J∙kg-1. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate a substantial disagreement in AnWC between CP3´AO and the other models. The 7 + YLIN and 7-YLIN generated 10% lower AnWC values than the GELAST model, whereas 7 + YLIN and 7-YLIN generated similar values of AnWC.

Physiological Responses and Performance During a 3-Minute Cycle Time Trial: Standard Paced Versus All-Out Paced.

PURPOSE: To compare performance and physiological responses between a standard-paced 3-minute time trial (TTSP, ie, pacing based on normal intention) and a consistently all-out-paced 3-minute time trial (TTAOP). METHODS: Sixteen well-trained male cyclists completed the TTSP and TTAOP, on separate days of testing, on a cycling ergometer with power output and respiratory variables measured. Time trials were preceded by 7 × 4-minute submaximal stages of increasing intensity with the linear relationship between power output and metabolic rate used to estimate the contribution from aerobic and anaerobic energy resources. The time course of anaerobic and aerobic contributions to power output was analyzed using statistical parametric mapping. RESULTS: Mean power output was not different between the 2 pacing strategies (TTSP = 417 [43] W, TTAOP = 423 [41] W; P = 0.158). TTAOP resulted in higher peak power output (P < .001), mean ventilation rate (P < .001), mean heart rate (P = .044), peak accumulated anaerobically attributable work (P = .026), post-time-trial blood lactate concentration (P = .035), and rating of perceived exertion (P = .036). Statistical parametric mapping revealed a higher anaerobic contribution to power output during the first ∼30 seconds and a lower contribution between ∼90 and 170 seconds for TTAOP than TTSP. The aerobic contribution to power output was higher between ∼55 and 75 seconds for TTAOP. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no significant difference in performance (ie, mean power output) between the 2 pacing strategies, differences were found in the distribution of anaerobically and aerobically attributable power output. This implies that athletes can pace a 3-minute maximal effort very differently but achieve the same result.