Prevalence and Risk Factors of Distal Symmetric Polyneuropathy Among Predominantly Non-Hispanic Black, Low-Income Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is a disabling, often painful condition associated with falls and reduced quality of life. Non-Hispanic Black people and people with low income are underrepresented in existing DSP studies; therefore, it is unknown whether data accurately reflect the prevalence, risk factors, and burden of disease in these populations. METHODS: Patients older than 40 years presenting to an outpatient internal medicine clinic predominantly serving Medicaid patients in Flint, Michigan, were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, including medication use, anthropomorphic measurements, fasting lipids, and hemoglobin A1c were collected. DSP was defined using the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to model DSP and undiagnosed DSP as a function of potential risk factors age, metabolic syndrome, and race. DSP burden was measured using Peripheral Neuropathy Quality of Life Instrument-97. RESULTS: Two hundred participants were enrolled, and 169 (85%) completed all data collection. The population was 55% female of mean age (SD) 58.2 years (10.4) and 69% non-Hispanic Black. Among the population, 50% had diabetes, 67% had metabolic syndrome, and 47% had a household income <$20,000. DSP was present in 73% of the population, of which 75% were previously undiagnosed. Neuropathic pain was documented in 57% of participants with DSP. DSP based on mTCNS criteria was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.2]) and metabolic syndrome (OR 4.4 [1.1-18.1]). Non-Hispanic Black participants had lower odds of DSP (OR 0.1 [0.01-0.4]) than non-Hispanic White and Hispanic participants. DSP burden was high, including increased pain, health-related worry, and poorer quality of life (all p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: DSP is extremely common and often underrecognized in this predominantly non-Hispanic Black, low-income population and leads to substantial disease burden. Metabolic syndrome is a highly prevalent, modifiable risk factor in this population that should be managed to lower DSP prevalence.

Balanced crystalloids versus isotonic saline in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous fluids are one of the most used medical therapy for patients, especially critically ill patients. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing between balanced crystalloids and normal saline in critically ill patients and its effect on various clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS AND DATA SOURCE: Electronic search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane library, and clinical trials.gov from inception through March 1, 2018, with inclusion of prospective studies that investigated one of the primary outcomes which were acute kidney injury (AKI) and in-hospital mortality while secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and new renal replacement therapy (RRT). RESULTS: Six RCTs were included. Total of 19,332 patients were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (11.5% vs 12.2%; OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85-1.01; P = 0.09; I2 = 0%), incidence of AKI (12% vs 12.7%, OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.01; P = 0.1; I2 = 0), overall ICU mortality (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.81-1.01, P = 0.08, I2 = 0%), or need for new RRT (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.28, P = 0.65, I2 = 38%) between balanced crystalloids and isotonic saline in critically ill patients. CONCLUSION: Balanced crystalloids and isotonic saline have no difference on various clinical outcomes including in-hospital mortality, AKI, overall ICU mortality, and new RRT. Further powerful clinical trials are required to determine the relationship between crystalloid fluid type and clinical outcomes.

A survey of emergency department staff about challenges and recommendations for emergency department care of extended care facility patients.

OBJECTIVES: Extended care facility (ECF) patients who transfer to emergency departments (EDs) can pose problems when complicated health problems require extra resources. Higher numbers of older patients are projected to use EDs, so we aimed to identify problems now to implement solutions before they worsen in the future. DESIGN: This was a prospective survey research study. SETTING: ED in a safety net teaching hospital in the Midwest. PARTICIPANTS: ED personnel. MEASUREMENTS: Confidential, anonymous survey collected views and opinions of ED personnel about problematic issues related to emergency care of ECF residents. The survey targeted communication problems, patient satisfaction concerns, difficult characteristics of patient population, need for education, need for research--and solicited open-ended remarks. RESULTS: ED staff reported concern about flawed communication and poor documentation from the ECF. Based on job title, divergent viewpoints were reported about pharmacological challenges and comfort levels in managing older patients in the ED. Top training priorities were special needs of older adults, detecting abuse in older adults, and specific medical and psychosocial issues associated with older adults. Increased communication among all levels of geriatric care is recommended, especially from extended care facility staff before patient arrival at the ED. CONCLUSION: Because population projections predict an increasing trend of older adults, health care providers must think ahead and prepare for future medical needs. This survey was an inexpensive and effective way to identify next steps. We plan to use the survey results to initiate collaboration with ED staff, EMS providers, and ECF staff to identify specific actions to improve acute care for elderly patients--for the present and the future.