ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for complex aneurysms treated with flow diversion and flow disruption is acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus clopidogrel. However, clopidogrel resistance frequently occurs and can lead to thromboembolic events. Ticagrelor is an alternative not requiring platelet inhibition testing. We compared two DAPT regimens (ASA with clopidogrel or ticagrelor) on morbi-mortality, safety and efficacy of unruptured aneurysm embolization with flow diverter/disrupter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a 1:1 matched cohort compares patients treated with ASA + clopidogrel (March 2013-December 2015) vs. ASA + ticagrelor (January 2016-March 2017). No platelet inhibition testing was conducted. Patients matched for age (±10 years), type of treatment and aneurysm sac size ( ± 2 mm). Primary outcome measures were morbidity and mortality at 1-month; secondary outcomes were thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications [on angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] and groin complications. Outcomes were compared using bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Ninety patients fulfilled inclusion criteria, of which 80 remained after matching (40 per group). There was no statistical difference in 1-month morbidity between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (2.5% vs. 10%, P = 0.36) and no deaths reported. We observed no significant differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups in terms of angiographic thromboembolic complications (5% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.43), territorial infarction on DWI (2.5% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.61), angiographic (0% vs. 0%, P = 1) and MRI (5% vs 5%, P = 1) hemorrhagic complications, new microbleeds (57.5% vs. 40%, P = 0.12) and groin puncture complications (2.5% vs. 0%, P = 1). At three months, there was no delayed territorial infarction or hemorrhage in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor is safe and effective in replacing clopidogrel as DAPT for unruptured aneurysms.
