Animal Welfare Worldwide, the Opinion of Practicing Veterinarians.

The objective of this study was to investigate the animal welfare issues considered the most important by companion animal veterinarians worldwide. For this purpose, a global survey of several potential animal welfare issues was distributed via SurveyMonkey® in multiple languages. The distribution of survey responses differed by region. The main animal welfare concern reported worldwide was obesity, although there were differences across regions, possibly due to cultural and socioeconomic factors. Anthropomorphism (attributing human qualities or characteristics to an animal) was an issue in western countries but less so in Asia, Africa, and Oceania. There were significant differences between Asia and Europe, Africa, and Oceania in the importance and prevalence of convenience euthanasia. There were also age and sex differences in participant responses, with older veterinarians reporting fewer welfare problems than younger veterinarians, and female veterinarians reporting more welfare issues than their male counterparts.

Welfare of non-traditional pets.

The keeping of non-traditional or 'exotic' pets has been growing in popularity worldwide. In addition to the typical welfare challenges of keeping more traditional pet species like dogs and cats, ensuring the welfare of non-traditional pets is complicated by factors such as lack of knowledge, difficulties meeting requirements in the home and where and how animals are obtained. This paper uses examples of different species to highlight three major welfare concerns: ensuring that pets under our care i) function well biologically, ii) are free from negative psychological states and able to experience normal pleasures, and iii) lead reasonably natural lives. The keeping of non-traditional pets also raises ethical concerns about whether the animal poses any danger to others (e.g. transmission of zoonotic diseases) and whether the animal might cause environmental damage (e.g. invading non-native habitats when released). The authors used these considerations to create a checklist, which identifies and organises the various concerns that may arise over keeping non-traditional species as pets. An inability to address these concerns raises questions about how to mitigate them or even whether or not certain species should be kept as pets at all. Thus, the authors propose five categories, which range from relatively unproblematic pet species to species whose keeping poses unacceptable risks to the animals, to humans, or to the environment. This approach to the evaluation and categorisation of species could provide a constructive basis for advocacy and regulatory actions.

Analyses of fecal and hair glucocorticoids to evaluate short- and long-term stress and recovery of Asiatic black bears (Ursus thibetanus) removed from bile farms in China.

Demand for traditional Chinese medicines has given rise to the practice of maintaining Asiatic black bears (Ursus thibetanus) in captivity to harvest bile. We evaluated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity in Asiatic black bears on a bile farm in China by measuring cortisol in hair. We also monitored hair and fecal glucocorticoid metabolites as bears acclimated to improved husbandry at the Animals Asia Foundation China Bear Rescue Center (CBRC) after removal from other bile farms. Fecal samples were collected twice weekly for ~1 year, and hair was obtained from bears upon arrival at the CBRC and again ≥163 days later. Paired hair samples showed declines in cortisol concentrations of 12-88% in 38 of 45 (84%, p<0.001) bears after arrival and acclimation at the rehabilitation facility. Concentrations of cortisol in hair from bears on the bile farm were similar to initial concentrations upon arrival at the CBRC but were higher than those collected after bears had been at the CBRC for ≥163 days. Fecal glucocorticoid concentrations varied across months and were highest in April and declined through December, possibly reflecting seasonal patterns, responses to the arrival and socialization of new bears at the CBRC, and/or annual metabolic change. Data from segmental analysis of hair supports the first of these explanations. Our findings indicate that bears produced elevated concentrations of glucocorticoids on bile farms, and that activity of the HPA axis declined following relocation. Thus, hair cortisol analyses are particularly well suited to long-term, retrospective assessments of glucocorticoids in ursids. By contrast, fecal measures were not clearly associated with rehabilitation, but rather reflected more subtle endocrine changes, possibly related to seasonality.

A relative cost-effectiveness analysis of different methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy.

The relative cost and cost-effectiveness of different methods of screening diabetic patients for sight-threatening retinopathy are assessed. The resource costs per screening visit, both to the health service and to patients, of ophthalmoscopic examination by primary screeners including general practitioners, hospital physicians, and ophthalmic opticians are estimated together with those of a similar screening test by ophthalmological clinical assistants. The total resource cost per screen of screening using non-mydriatic photography is also estimated. Using estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence generated in the screening of 3318 diabetic patients in three UK centres, the relative cost-effectiveness of screening methods is estimated in terms of their cost per true positive case detected. On the assumption that a patient makes a special trip for eye screening, the cost per true positive case detected for primary screeners ranges from 633 pounds for a GP-screened group in one centre to 1079 pounds for another GP-screened group in a second centre; the cost per true positive case detected of photography ranges from 497 pounds for a camera that is taken to general practices in one centre to 1546 pounds for a hospital-based camera. Relative cost-effectiveness changes if, in some contexts, the screening can take place without requiring an additional patient visit, and is strongly related to the relative sensitivity of the screening methods and to the prior probability (prevalence or incidence) of retinopathy in the diabetic population.

Screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of different methods.

The results of the screening of 3318 diabetic patients for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in three UK centres are reported. The aims of the study were to determine the extent of diabetic retinopathy in the screened population and to assess the relative effectiveness of different screening methods in appropriately referring cases from a diabetic population, in a context very close to a routine clinical service. Patients were assessed by ophthalmoscopic examination by an ophthalmological clinical assistant. The clinical assistants' referral grades formed the reference standard against which to assess the effectiveness of other screening methods including ophthalmoscopy by primary screeners who were general practitioners (GPs), ophthalmic opticians and hospital physicians, and the assessment by consultant ophthalmologists of non-mydriatic Polaroid fundus photography. The performance of primary screeners based on ophthalmoscopy ranged from a sensitivity of 0.41, with a specificity of 0.89, for one of the GP groups, to a sensitivity of 0.67, with a specificity of 0.96, for the hospital physician group. The performance of the non-mydriatic camera ranged from a sensitivity of 0.35, with a specificity of 0.95, to a sensitivity of 0.67, with a specificity of 0.98.