Interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in children: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is usually asymptomatic in children, but significant liver disease may occur. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in children with chronic HCV. We determined the optimal ribavirin dose in an initial cohort of a phase 1 study and then subsequently used it, in combination with interferon alfa-2b, in a second cohort of this study and a phase 3 trial. The primary efficacy endpoint in all studies was sustained virological response, defined by undetectable serum HCV RNA 24 weeks after completion of therapy. All efficacy and safety analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat population. Children receiving interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin 15 mg/kg/d in the phase 1 study had the maximum reduction in serum HCV RNA at treatment weeks 4 and 12 with an acceptable safety profile. This ribavirin dose was selected as optimal and used in all subsequent studies. In all, 46% (54/118) of optimally treated children achieved sustained virological response. Sustained virological response was significantly higher in children with HCV genotype 2/3 (84%) than in those with HCV genotype 1 (36%). Adverse events led to dose modification in 37 (31%) and discontinuation in 8 (7%). Multiple-dose interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin peak and trough concentrations and area-under-the-curve were similar between children and adults. In conclusion, interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin is effective and safe in children with chronic hepatitis C virus.

A randomized controlled trial of immunosuppression conversion for the treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the effect of immunosuppression conversion on progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). METHODS: Forty-two cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients were studied. Patients were included if they had a negatively sloping reciprocal of creatinine vs time (ROCT) plot for >6 months and biopsy-proven CAN. Patients were excluded if they had previously been treated with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or their serum creatinine was >400 micromol/l. Subjects were randomly treated with either: (A) MMF/reduced dose cyclosporin [MMF for azathioprine 0.5-1.0 g bd; cyclosporin trough level (C(0)): 75-100 ng/ml]; (B) tacrolimus for cyclosporin (C(0): 5-10 ng/ml); or (C) continuation of standard therapy. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured at baseline and after 6 months. RESULTS: Two patients started dialysis within 6 months (one each from groups A and B). One patient in group A was intolerant of MMF, six others reported gastrointestinal symptoms and three developed anaemia. Cyclosporin dose was reduced by 24% [interquartile range (IQR): 14-27%] in group A [end-of-study C(0): 99 ng/ml (IQR: 90-113 ng/ml)]. In group B, the end-of-study tacrolimus C(0) was 7 ng/ml (5-9 ng/ml). The end-of-study cyclosporin C(0) in group C was 163 ng/ml (145-215 ng/ml). Comparison of ROCT slopes before and after intervention revealed a treatment advantage for group A (P<0.05). The GFR analysis was supportive (P = 0.05). When patients with GFR <20 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at enrollment were excluded from the analysis, the treatment advantage for group A reached statistical significance (n = 27, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MMF/reduced dose cyclosporin is superior to tacrolimus-for-cyclosporin and standard dose cyclosporin in patients with CAN, at least in the short term. The cyclosporin dose reduction component is likely to be of particular importance. Other findings suggest that early intervention is beneficial.