ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pleural effusions present a diagnostic challenge. Approximately 20% are associated with cancer and some 50% require invasive procedures to perform diagnosis. Determination of tumour markers may help to identify patients with malignant effusions. Two strategies are used to obtain high specificity in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions: a) high cut-off, and b) fluid/serum (F/S) ratio and low cut-off. The aim of this study is to compare these two strategies and to establish whether the identification of possible false positives using benign biomarkers - ADA, CRP and % of polymorphonuclear cells - improves diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We studied 402 pleural effusions, 122 of them malignant. Benign biomarkers were determined in pleural fluid, and CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and CA15-3 in pleural fluid and serum. RESULTS: Establishing a cut-off value for each TM for a specificity of 100%, a joint sensitivity of 66.5% was obtained. With the F/S strategy and low cut-off points, sensitivity was 77% and specificity 98.2%, Subclassifying cases with negative benign biomarkers, both strategies achieved a specificity of 100%; sensitivity was 69.9% for single determination and 80.6% for F/S ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The best interpretation of TM in the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions is obtained using the F/S ratio in the group with negative benign biomarkers.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/diagnosis , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnosis, Differential , Electrochemical Techniques/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pleural Effusion/diagnosis , Pleural Effusion/metabolism , Young AdultABSTRACT
The utility of tumour markers (TM) in the differential diagnosis of cancer in serous effusion (fluid effusion (FE)) has been the subject of controversy. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate our previous study and to assess whether the addition of adenosine deaminase (ADA), C-reactive protein (CRP) or percentage of polymorphonuclear cells (%PN) allows the identification of false positives. In this study, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 15-3, cancer antigen 19-9, ADA, CRP and %PN in FE were determined in 347 patients with 391 effusions. Effusions were considered as malignant effusion when at least one TM in serum exceeded the cutoff and the ratio FE/S was higher than 1.2. Also, cases with values of ADA, CRP and %PN above the established cutoffs in serous effusion were considered as potential false positives. The combined sensitivity and specificity of the three TM was 76.2 % (95 % confidence intervals (CI) 67.8-83.3 %) and 97.0 % (95 % CI 94.1-98.7), respectively. Subanalysis of the 318 cases with previous criteria and negative ADA, CRP and %PN obtained sensitivities of 78.4 % (95 % CI 69.4-85.6) and a specificity of 100 % (95 % CI 98.2-100). The results obtained validate our previous study and are improved with the addition of ADA, CRP and %PN. TM in serous effusions and serum could be useful for the diagnostic assessment of patients with serous effusions.
