Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 16(11): 1687-1695, 2022 11 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36449639

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has led to millions of deaths around the world. The indirect effects of the pandemic, include disruption of routine immunization services. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a retrospective review to assess the impact of the pandemic on routine immunization in Yerevan and the vaccinations against COVID-19 in Armenia. We compared the number of administered doses of DPT/VHB/HIB/IPV1,2,3, Pneumococcal1,2,3, Rotarix1,2, and MMR1 vaccines in target groups in 2020 and 2021 and the total vaccination coverage in 2019, 2020, and 2021. We also analyzed the number of COVID-19 vaccines administered in Armenia from 17 May 2021 to 6 February 2022. RESULTS: There was a decline in the number of administered doses of vaccines at the beginning of the pandemic due to restrictive quarantine measures: 16 ± 4.5 (95% CI, 11.8-20.2), p < 0.05, during the second wave 18 ± 2.6 (95% CI, 15.6-20.4), p < 0.05 and during the interruption due to COVID-19 vaccine delivery 16 ± 7.4 (95% CI, 9.1-22.9), p < 0.05. There was no significant decrease in the number of vaccinations during the first, third, and fourth pandemic waves (p > 0.05) Overall, the COVID-19 vaccination process was slow and only 30% of the population were vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic led to disruptions in the routine immunization process, but there was no significant decrease in the total vaccine coverage due to rapid scaling up of the vaccination services and catch-up vaccinations. Thus, the restrictions imposed during the pandemic did not affect the overall progress of vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Armenia/epidemiology , Vaccination
2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(10)2021 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34696296

ABSTRACT

This paper highlights the low levels of vaccine coverage and high levels of reported vaccination hesitancy in Yerevan, Armenia, that present profound challenges to the control of disease through routine vaccination programmes. We draw on investigations of hesitancy towards the introduction of new vaccines, using the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil as a case study, to interrogate underlying challenges to vaccine acceptance. We analyse primary data from the introduction of Gardasil, first used in Armenia in 2017, to investigate how levels of medical knowledge amongst physicians in 20 health facilities in Yerevan, Armenia, regarding vaccine science influence attitudes towards the introduction of a newly developed vaccine. A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was completed by 348 physicians between December 2017 and September 2018. The responding physicians displayed a respectable level of knowledge and awareness regarding vaccination with respect to some characteristics (e.g., more than 81% knew that HPV infection was commonly asymptomatic, 73% knew that HPV infection was implicated in most cervical cancers, and 87% knew that cervical cancer is the most prevalent cancer amongst women) but low knowledge and poor understanding of other key issues such as the age at which women were most likely to develop cervical cancer (only 15% answered correctly), whether or not the vaccine should be administered to people who had already been infected (27% answered correctly) and whether sexually active young people should be treated for infection before vaccination (26% answered correctly). The study suggests that the drivers of vaccine hesitancy are complex and may not be consistent from vaccine to vaccine. The Armenian healthcare sector may need to provide additional training, awareness-raising and educational activities alongside the introduction of new vaccines to improve understanding of and trust in vaccination programmes.

3.
Acta Paediatr ; 110(2): 458-464, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32640087

ABSTRACT

AIM: Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is still a disease with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to analyse retrospectively whether the introduction of a multi-modal three-component enteral medication regimen resulted in a change in morbidity and mortality in neonates with NEC. METHODS: When diagnosis of NEC was established, the following multi-modal three-component enteral medication regimen was administered enterally (via nasogastric tube): an antibiotic, an antifungal agent and a probiotic. The primary outcome parameters were intestinal perforation, surgical interventions and mortality during the observational periods. RESULTS: In the study period, 2212 patients were admitted to the NICU, out of which 200 (9%) developed NEC. Significantly fewer infants died in the Intervention Group (13 of 104 infants, 13%) compared to the Control Group (38 of 96 infants, 40%) (P = .0001). No infant in the Intervention Group (0%) presented with an intestinal perforation, as compared to 15 infants (16%) within the Control Group (P = .0001). In the Control Group, 21 infants (22%) needed surgical intervention, whereas 0 (0%) infants needed this in the Intervention Group. CONCLUSION: The introduction of an enteral multi-modal three-component medication regimen resulted in a significant reduction of mortality and of need for surgical intervention in infants suffering from NEC.


Subject(s)
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing , Infant, Premature, Diseases , Enteral Nutrition , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Morbidity , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...