Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Clin Kidney J ; 14(2): 507-515, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33623673

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of both cancer and end-stage renal disease is increasing. In addition, medical advances have meant increased survival rates for both diseases. Many chemotherapeutics are renally excreted, and conversely, renal insufficiency promotes a pro-neoplastic state, including genitourinary and other cancers. Dialysis prolongs life while increasing cancer risk. Proposed oncogenic mechanisms include immune dysfunction, chronic inflammation, changes in gut microbiota and stimulation of the renin-angiotensin system. This review summarizes current concepts in the relationship between cancer and renal insufficiency.

2.
J Nephrol ; 34(3): 649-659, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32440840

ABSTRACT

The most common cause of liver disease worldwide is now non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD refers to a spectrum of disease ranging from steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, causing cirrhosis, and ultimately hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the impact of NAFLD is not limited to the liver. NAFLD has extra-hepatic consequences, most notably, cardiovascular and renal disease. NAFLD and chronic kidney disease share pathogenic mechanisms including insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, inflammation and oxidative stress. Not surprisingly, there has been a recent surge in efforts to manage NAFLD in an integrated way that not only protects the liver but also delays comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease. This concept of simultaneously addressing the main disease target and comorbidities is key to improve outcomes, as recently demonstrated by clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists in diabetes. HIF activators, already marketed in China, also have the potential to protect both liver and kidney, as suggested by preclinical data. This review concisely discusses efforts at identifying common pathogenic pathways between NAFLD and chronic kidney disease with an emphasis on potential paradigm shifts in diagnostic workup and therapeutic management.


Subject(s)
Insulin Resistance , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , China , Humans , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/diagnosis , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/drug therapy , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy
3.
J Nephrol ; 32(6): 909-917, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31321745

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and it is frequently encountered in chronic kidney disease (CKD) subjects. CKD patients are already at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) complications and the addition of AF further aggravates the prognosis. Data is missing regarding on how to best approach CKD patients with AF, due to lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). AF and CKD have a double edged-sword relationship. On one hand, there are kidney-specific mechanisms which can alter cardiac structure and predispose to AF, and on the other hand the development of AF itself can accelerate the progression of CKD. Furthermore, the synergistic effect of these two entities raises serious issues concerning the balance between bleeding and thrombotic risk. Anticoagulant treatment can be challenging, especially in end stage renal disease (ESRD), where the net clinical benefit is still unclear. The decision of rate vs. rhythm control lies mostly on general consensus, rather than on RCTs. The purpose of this review is to reinforce the symbiotic relationship between AF and CKD, to briefly summarize the current state of the therapeutic approach in this particular population and to highlight novel potential therapeutic strategies.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Thromboembolism/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Humans , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
4.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 51(7): 1173-1189, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31119518

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors such as lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), the genetic polymorphisms of apolipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein E (ApoE), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) increase the prevalence of atherosclerosis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) through quantitative and qualitative alterations. Given the high burden of cardiovascular fatal events in ESRD, this review aims to gather studies depicting apolipoproteins' changes in ESRD, to describe current evidence and to explore potential lipid-lowering therapies. METHODS: We searched the electronic database of PubMed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies evaluating apolipoproteins in ESRD. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies (including case-control, prospective, or retrospective cohort), and reviews/meta-analysis were included if reference was made to apolipoproteins and cardiovascular consequences in ESRD. RESULTS: 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. We found a significant correlation between Lp(a) plasma concentrations and atherosclerosis. Lp(a) levels were independent risk factors for atherothrombosis and cardiovascular mortality. LMW apo(a) phenotype proved to be the best predictor for coronary events in ESRD. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in ApoE gene affected the expression and function of the protein, increasing the risk of cardiovascular events. ApoB had a significant correlation with the value of carotid intima-media thickness and vascular stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: The picture of "lipid milieu" in ESRD has not been clearly described. Novel studies show that specific apolipoproteins suffer modifications in uremic patients, being correlated with cardiovascular events. Probably in the next years, the treatment of dyslipidemia in ESRD will not merely target LDL or total cholesterol, but specific isoforms of apolipoproteins which seem to become the central part of the problem.


Subject(s)
Apolipoproteins/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Apolipoproteins/classification , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Comorbidity , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Risk Factors
5.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 49(12): 2195-2204, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28948420

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, despite constant investigation, no current single treatment has been able to decrease the incidence of diabetic nephropathy and to significantly reduce progression of diabetic CKD. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and proteinuria (>0.5 g/day) after a screening and treatment optimization phase were randomly assigned to receive silymarin or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite outcome: mortality, decline of eGFR > 50% and renal replacement therapy. Secondary outcomes were a composite renal outcome (defined as a decline of eGFR ≥ 50% or ESRD) and also to test the effect of silymarin on the change in eGFR and proteinuria. We also assessed the adverse effects (hospitalizations, headache or gastrointestinal symptoms) during the study. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the two study groups regarding the primary and renal outcomes (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.3-1.2, p = 0.15; HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.24, p = 0.16, respectively). At study end, eGFR declined significantly in both arms (p < 0.001), irrespective of the treatment group allocation, and there were no significant changes in proteinuria. There was a significant difference in hospitalizations rates between the two study groups (0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Silymarin did not show a significant reduction in the primary and secondary outcomes. Importantly, silymarin treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the hospitalization rate.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Nephropathies/therapy , Glomerular Filtration Rate/drug effects , Protective Agents/therapeutic use , Silymarin/therapeutic use , Aged , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Diabetic Nephropathies/complications , Diabetic Nephropathies/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Protective Agents/pharmacology , Proteinuria/etiology , Renal Replacement Therapy , Silymarin/pharmacology , Survival Rate
6.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 49(10): 1793-1800, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836059

ABSTRACT

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) has been described as a neurological condition observed in a variety of clinical settings and is characterized by focal neurological deficits, seizures, headaches, altered mental status, and visual impairment, associated with transient typical lesions on neuroimaging, predominantly in the posterior part of the brain. The most common risk factors for PRES are hypertension, renal diseases, and the use of calcineurin inhibitors. The incidence of PRES in children with renal disorders varies between 4 and 9%, according to different reports. Vasogenic cerebral edema is considered the major pathophysiological mechanism of PRES. There are two main theories regarding the genesis of this edema: (1) hyperperfusion, due to autoregulatory failure of the cerebral vasculature, and (2) hypoperfusion, due to vasoconstriction of the cerebral arteries. In addition, PRES might also be the result of a systemic inflammatory state causing endothelial dysfunction. The management of PRES includes BP control, treatment of seizures, and removal of or reduction in calcineurin inhibitors. Intravenous administration of antihypertensive therapy is preferred, and various drugs have been used in this regard, including nicardipine, labetalol, sodium nitroprusside, and hydralazine. The prognosis of PRES is usually benign, except for rare cases with intracranial hemorrhage.


Subject(s)
Kidney Diseases/complications , Neuroimaging , Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome/diagnosis , Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome/etiology , Calcineurin Inhibitors/adverse effects , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome/therapy , Risk Factors , Steroids/adverse effects
7.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 47(10): 1703-8, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26329736

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between electrocardiographic parameters and heart rate variability with cardiovascular events and mortality among chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled 116 asymptomatic patients in whom we performed ambulatory 24-h electrocardiographic Holter monitoring and before and after hemodialysis electrocardiographs. We measured the interval (PR, QRS, QTc, QTc dispersion) differences on the surface electrocardiographs and obtained frequency-domain measures from Holter monitoring (VLF, LF, HF and the LF/HF ratio). RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 13 participants died (11.2 %) and 16 (13.8 %) patients experienced a cardiovascular event. The pre-post-dialysis difference in QTc interval was the best predictor for cardiovascular events (95 % CI 0.453-0.786), while pre-dialysis QRS interval was the predictor for all-cause mortality (95 % CI 1.134-3.136). Also, both outcomes were predicted by pre-post-dialysis difference in PR interval and VLF. CONCLUSIONS: Interval changes during hemodialysis are predictive for cardiovascular events and mortality. Autonomic dysfunction and changes in PR should be monitored routinely, particularly in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.


Subject(s)
Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Heart Rate/physiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Renal Dialysis , Aged , Cause of Death , Female , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Stroke/epidemiology
8.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ; 18(2): 188-98, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23530490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with poor cardiovascular outcome in CKD. Electrocardiogram (ECG) is low-cost but infrequently used to assess presence of LVH in dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to establish which ECG-determined LVH method is most sensitive in dialysis patients, and also most predictive of death. METHODS: This was a longitudinal observational study in dialysis patients from a single center, undergoing interval ECGs. Fourteen methods of ECG LVH assessment were compared. Survival was also compared between four LVH evolutionary categories: persistent LVH; new LVH; LVH regression; and no LVH. RESULTS: The study included 418 dialysis patients (46.3% women, mean age 51 years, mean follow up 67 months, 76 deaths, 37 cardiovascular deaths). LVH prevalence varied according to method (range 13.4-41.9%). No measurement predicted all-cause mortality. After Cox regression, there was an independent association between LVH and cardiovascular mortality using Novacode (HR = 3.04; 95% [CI] = 1.11-8.28, P < 0.05), but not with other methods. Patients with persistent ECG changes of LVH had increased risk of cardiovascular mortality compared to other LVH evolutionary categories (P < 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: ECG scoring of LVH can be predictive of cardiovascular mortality. The Novacode method, based on repolarization abnormalities, is a better predictor than standard ECG techniques that are based on voltage criteria. Novacode LVH estimation at dialysis initiation may prove to be a noninvasive and cost-effective bedside tool for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients receiving dialysis.


Subject(s)
Electrocardiography/methods , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/complications , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/diagnosis , Renal Dialysis/methods , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/mortality , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...