Impact of molecular residual disease post allografting in myelofibrosis patients.

We screened 136 patients with myelofibrosis and a median age of 58 years who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for molecular residual disease for JAKV617F (n=101), thrombopoietin receptor gene (MPL) (n=4) or calreticulin (CALR) (n=31) mutation in peripheral blood on day +100 and +180 after AHSCT. After a median follow-up of 78 months, the 5-year estimated overall survival was 60% (95% confidence interval (CI): 50-70%) and the cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was 26% (95% CI: 18-34%) for the entire study population. The percentage of molecular clearance on day 100 was higher in CALR-mutated patients (92%) in comparison with MPL- (75%) and JAKV617F-mutated patients (67%). Patients with detectable mutation at day +100 or at day +180 had a significant higher risk of clinical relapse at 5 years than molecular-negative patients (62% vs 10%, P<0.001) and 70% vs 10%, P<0.001, respectively) irrespectively of the underlying mutation. In a multivariate analysis, high-risk diseases status (hazard ratio (HR) 2.5; 95% CI: 1.18-5.25, P=0.016) and detectable MRD at day 180 (HR 8.36, 95% CI: 2.76-25.30, P<0.001) were significant factors for a higher risk of relapse.

Toxicity-reduced, myeloablative allograft followed by lenalidomide maintenance as salvage therapy for refractory/relapsed myeloma patients.

Relapse after dose-reduced allograft in advanced myeloma patients remains high. To reduce the risk of relapse, we investigated a myeloablative toxicity-reduced allograft (aSCT) consisting of i.v. BU and CY followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy in 33 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapsed following an autograft after a median of 12 months. The cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality at 1 year was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-14). After a median interval of 168 days following aSCT, 24 patients started with a median dose of 5 mg (r, 5-15) lenalidomide without dexamethasone. During follow-up, 13 patients discontinued lenalidomide owing to progressive disease (n=6), GvHD (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), or fatigue (n=2). Major toxicities of lenalidomide were GvHD II-III (28%), viral reactivation (16%), thrombocytopenia (III-IV°,16%), neutropenia (III/IV°, 8%), peripheral neuropathy (I/II°, 16%), or other infectious complication (8%). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 42% (95% CI: 18-66). The 3-year estimated probability of PFS and OS was 52% (95% CI: 28-76) and 79% (95% CI: 63-95), respectively. Toxicity-reduced myeloablative allograft followed by lenalidomide maintenance is feasible and effective in relapsed patients with MM, but the induction of GvHD should be considered.

Screening and monitoring of MPL W515L mutation with real-time PCR in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic-SCT.

Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) after allogeneic (allo)-SCT for myelofibrosis (MF) allows recognizing the depth of remission and thus guides application of appropriate therapeutic interventions. MPL W515L/K mutations, which are detected in 5-10% of JAK2V617F-negative patients, may be useful for this purpose. Using a highly sensitive quantitative PCR method, we tested 90 patients with MF who underwent allo-SCT for the presence of MPL W515L/K mutations. Two patients with primary MF were found to harbor MPLW515L while no patient was positive for MPLW515K mutation. Both patients were JAK2V617F negative and cleared the mutation rapidly after allo-SCT and remained negative for a median follow-up of 19 months. The results of molecular monitoring correlated well with other remission parameters such as normalization of peripheral blood counts and morphology and complete donor chimerism. We conclude that MPLW515L can be cleared after allo-SCT and hence may be used as an MRD marker in a proportion of JAK2V617F-negative MF patients.

Lenalidomide as salvage therapy after allo-SCT for multiple myeloma is effective and leads to an increase of activated NK (NKp44(+)) and T (HLA-DR(+)) cells.

We investigated efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide in 24 heavily pretreated myeloma patients with a median age of 59 years (range: 37-70) and relapse after allo-SCT. Lenalidomide was given at a dose of 15 mg (n=4), or 25 mg (n=20), orally once daily on day 1 to day 1 every 28 days, with (n=20) or without (n=4) DHAP. The median number of lenalidomide cycles was five (range: 2-17). Major side effects were leukopenia (grade 4: 4%, grade 3: 21% and grade 2: 17%) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3: 17% and grade 2: 29%); infectious complications were observed in 50%. Non-hematological toxicity consisted of muscle cramps (n=9), fatigue (n=5) and constipation (n=2). Mild grade I-II GVHD was seen in three patients. Response was achieved in 66%: CR in 8%, VGPR in 8%, PR in 50% and SD in 13%. The median time to progression was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.5-11.9), and median OS was 19.9 months (95% CI: 17.3-22.5). Immunomonitoring after lenalidomide showed significant increase of activated NK (NKp44(+)) and T (HLA-DR(+)) cells, as well as regulatory T cells (CD4(+), CD25(+), CD127(lo)), supporting an immunomodulating anti-myeloma effect of lenalidomide.

Detection of disseminated epithelial cancer cells by liquid culture--factors interfering with the standardization of assays.

BACKGROUND: Immunocytochemistry is the standard method for detection of disseminated breast-cancer cells. Tumor-cell enrichment by cell culture has been used by several investigators, however assays published have not been well-standardized. METHODS: Breast-cancer cells from two lines were diluted in hemopoietic cells of varying origins and cultured in different media and different flasks. Factors influencing successful tumor-cell amplification by liquid culture were identified by investigation of 277 cultures. Parallel clinical samples, consisting of BM aspirations, leukapheresis samples and peripheral blood samples obtained from women with breast cancer, were investigated in 113 cultures. Cancer-cell detection by cell culture could be compared to immunocytochemistry in 101 cases. RESULTS: The frequency of tumor-cell detection was not improved by liquid culture, but a significant correlation between conventional tumor-cell detection and detection after liquid culture was found. Factors influencing tumor-cell amplification in the dilution assay could not be transferred to the investigation of clinical samples. It was concluded that culture-enrichment of disseminated cancer cells was very complex, and could be influenced by a variety of factors-even when a model system was used. DISCUSSION: It should be recognized that culture-enriched cancer cells probably represent a highly selected population of disseminated cancer cells, despite the significant correlation between tumor cells detected by conventional methods and following conventional methods after liquid culture. There is currently no evidence to suggest that cancer-cell amplification by cell culture could become a standardized technique for the detection of disseminated epithelial tumor cells.

Disseminated breast cancer cells prior to and after high-dose therapy.

Women with breast cancer in a distinct stage of disease can benefit from high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell support; however, a significant number of these patients relapse despite this intensive treatment. This study investigates the persistence of malignancy on the single-cell level. A total of 194 data sets consisting of bone marrow and blood samples obtained prior to and after HDT and of aliquots of apheresis products were searched with immunocytochemistry and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for disseminated cancer cells. Presence of cancer cells in the marrow is frequent prior to and after HDT, but HDT reduces the amount of malignant cells in marrow significantly. In contrast, there was no effect on the number of circulating cancer cells. Reinfusion of contaminated apheresis products was surprisingly associated with a low number of malignant cells in bone marrow after HDT and vice versa. The impact of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow, apheresis, and peripheral blood on disease-free survival after HDT could be investigated in a total of 165 samples. Surprisingly, neither the presence of tumor cells in marrow or blood nor in apheresis was associated with a bad prognosis in Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis. These results suggest that apheresis products and bone marrow should be regarded as different biological compartments for epithelial cancer cells. It can be concluded that complete elimination of disseminated cancer cells by HDT is not always possible. The theory of reinduction of metastatic breast cancer by accidentally reinfused contaminants is not supported by this study so far. However, further research is necessary to identify distinct cell populations with the potentially capacity to metastasize.

Influence of preharvest tumor cell contamination in bone marrow or blood does not predict resultant tumor cell contamination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized stem cells.

Tumor cell contamination of stem cell collections harvested from breast cancer patients is a common phenomenon described by several investigators but with findings that vary among reports. Although so-called co-mobilization of these cells has been hypothesized, the origin of tumor cell contamination in stem cells is still unknown. A total of 47 G-CSF mobilized stem cell grafts from patients with nodal-positive (n = 30), chemosensitive metastatic (n = 11), and 5 women with inflammatory breast cancer were evaluated for cancer cells by immunocytochemistry. Additionally, 40 bone marrow aspirations and 23 peripheral blood samples collected prior to apheresis and after one to two cycles of conventional chemotherapy were available for examination. Tumor cell contamination of leukapheresis correlated best with preharvest blood state. This was valid when the nominal (positive/negative) presence of tumor cells in blood was compared to the nominal presence of tumor cells in apheresis samples and when the it was correlated to the tumor cell load of apheresis samples (TCL = tumor cells per 10(6) nucleated cells investigated). The correlation between blood and stem cells was better (nominal and quantitative) than that between marrow and stem cells, despite the larger sample size of marrow aspirations. The presence or absence of cancer cells in apheresis samples could not be safely predicted by the presence or absence of tumor cells in marrow or blood alone. Diagnostic specificity seems to improve from a combination of results from marrow and blood analysis. No correlation was found in quantitative analysis of tumor cell contamination between marrow and blood. In conclusion, the results suggest that blood and bone marrow represent different compartments for epithelial cancer cells and that contaminating tumor cells in stem cell harvests may be derived from the blood and/or marrow compartment. The tumor cell contamination of a stem cell harvest cannot be safely predicted by a preceding blood or marrow analysis.

Urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor expression on disseminated breast cancer cells.

Disseminated tumor cells are detected frequently in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood cell products of women undergoing high-dose therapy for breast cancer. Several attempts were made to purge autografts from contaminating cancer cells; however, the biological and clinical impact of these contaminations has not been clarified so far. Expression of distinct phenotypes is a surrogate marker for metastatic behavior of cancer cells. The expression of the urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor seems to be a factor of high importance. It is not expressed by normal mammary tissue. Disseminated cancer cells from marrow, blood, and stem cell products have been investigated by double-stain technique for urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R) expressing cytokeratin-positive cells. uPA-R(+)/CK(+) cells could be found in all qualities of samples; however, significantly less in G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells compared to samples of other provenance (p = 0.02). It can be concluded that epithelial cells of malignant phenotype occur in blood, marrow, and autografts of breast cancer patients. Populations of disseminated tumor cells are phenotypically heterogeneous. Reduced uPA-R expression on cancer cells from leukapheresis samples might suggest a less aggressive nature of these cells compared to disseminated cells found in bone marrow. Furthermore, the data suggest that the phenotype of tumor cell contamination in leukapheresis products differs significantly from those of disseminated cancer cells in bone marrow or blood.

Interference of cytokeratin-20 and mammaglobin-reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain assays designed for the detection of disseminated cancer cells.

Several reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) assays have been designed for the detection of disseminated cancer cells. The specificity of these discussed molecular approaches is controversial. Biological interference of the cytokeratin-20 and mammaglobin rtPCR assays has been investigated. Cell lines of different lineages and bone marrow and peripheral stem cells from patients without epithelial cancer have been examined for the transcription of the cytokeratin-20 (CK20) and mammaglobin messages prior to and after stimulation with different cytokines in a total of 370 liquid cultures. Amplification of both messages from clinical samples prior to stimulation does not support the high specificity for the detection of disseminated epithelial cancer cells as reported. Cytokeratin-20 was amplified from the chronic myeloic leukemia (CML)-derived line K562. Transcription was not influenced by cytokines, either in cell-line experiments or in clinical samples. The thesis of a low-level background transcription in granulocytes is supported. Mammaglobin was induced in cell lines significantly by GM-CSF and in clinical samples additionally by several more cytokines. These results indicate that under certain conditions involving cytokine production, the use of mammaglobin rtPCR for the detection of epithelial cancer cells could be limited. In conclusion, the mechanism of interference of both rtPCR assays are completely different and further research is necessary before the cytokeratin-20 or mammaglobin rtPCR could become standard methods for the detection of disseminated epithelial cancer cells. These factors leading to so-called false-positive results have to be considered in future applications of rtPCR for the detection of minimal residual disease.

Immunomagnetic tumor cell selection--implications for the detection of disseminated cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: The optimal method for the detection of disseminated epithelial cancer cells has not yet been found. The standard method, using immunocytochemistry, offers a sensitivity of up to 10(-6). Molecular methods such as cytokeratin-19 RT-PCR are about 10 times as sensitive, but they are hampered by interference such as illegitimate gene expression. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Immunomagnetic bead selection of epithelial cancer cells using conjugates directed against the human epithelial antigen (HEA) followed by immunocytochemistry testing was investigated in this trial. RESULTS: No cytokeratin-positive cells could be enriched from 56 control samples. In 104 clinical samples of bone marrow aspirations, PBPC collections, and venous blood obtained from breast cancer patients, the cytokeratin-positive rate increased significantly, from 29.9 percent before selection to 54.8 percent after enrichment. Even the yield of detected cancer cells was significantly higher after selection. Up to 2.5 x 10(8) MNCs were easily processed. However, the mean cancer cell recovery after HEA enrichment was only 24.4 percent. Subsequently, selected epithelial cells were successfully immunophenotyped by use of a double-stain technique detecting cytokeratin-positive cells and the urokinase-like plasminogen activator receptor. CONCLUSION: HEA bead selection in combination with the standard immunocytochemistry method is a powerful and specific tool for the detection of disseminated cancer cells without false-positive results. Furthermore, it delivers enough cells for subsequent investigations such as characterization studies.