Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Saudi Pharm J ; 23(1): 55-66, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25685044

ABSTRACT

Biofilm formation is often associated with increased Candida resistance toward antifungal agents. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the incidence of biofilm formation among Candida isolates and to investigate the effect of high doses of fluconazole {FLC}, voriconazole {VOC} and amphotericin B {AMB}, singly and in combination on mature biofilms. Moreover, it aimed to assess the expression of selected genes (CDR1, KRE1 and SKN1) responsible for Candida biofilm resistance. The study included 49 patients; samples were collected from the King Khalid Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Isolates were prepared for biofilm formation and quantification using 0.4% (w/v) crystal violet. Minimum Inhibitory concentration (MIC) and fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) were conducted by the broth microdilution method. Biofilm eradication was evaluated using counting, XTT stain intensity and observed under the inverted microscope. Selected genes were evaluated in Candida biofilms under the effect of antifungal exposure using QPCR. The major isolates were Candida albicans (65.3%) followed by Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata. 77.6% of the strains were biofilm formers. AMB showed susceptibility in 87.8% of isolates, followed by VOC (77.6%) and FLC (67.3%). MIC50 and MIC90 were (0.03, 0.125), (0.5, 8), (2, >128) µg/ml for AMB, VOC and FLC, respectively. 34.7% and 18.4% of the isolates were antagonistic to AMB/FLC and AMB/VOC, respectively. Mature biofilms of ten selected isolates were found resistant to FLC (1000 µg/ml). VOR and AMB concentration required to inhibit biofilm formation was 16-250 fold higher than the MIC for planktonic cells. Isolates showed significant reduction with antifungal combination when compared with the untreated controls (p value â©½ 0.01), or using fluconazole alone (p value â©½ 0.05). High doses of the antifungals were employed to assess the effect on the persisters' selected gene expression. Marked over expression of SKN1 and to a lesser extent KRE1 was noticed among the mature biofilms treated with AMB alone or in combination after 1 h of exposure, and SKN1 expression was even more sharply induced after 24 h. No statistically significant over expression of CDR1 was observed in biofilms after exposure to high doses of FLC, VOC or any of the combinations used.

2.
Can J Microbiol ; 54(5): 352-7, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18449219

ABSTRACT

Brucellosis is a widespread zoonosis. Currently the diagnosis of this zoonosis is based on microbiological and serological laboratory tests. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used to detect DNA from Brucella. Different target genes, primer pairs, PCR techniques, and extraction procedures have previously been published for Brucella detection. But only a few of these primers have been used in human samples, and only one study has been carried out to compare sensitivity between them. In the present study, 3 sets of primers and 3 different PCR protocols amplifying 3 different regions of the Brucella genome were compared for detection of Brucella DNA in a peripheral-blood PCR assay to conclude which is most suitable for the clinical diagnostic laboratory. These 3 pairs of primers amplify 3 different fragments included in (i) a gene encoding a 31 kDa Brucella abortus antigen (B4/B5), (ii) a sequence 16S rRNA of B. abortus (F4/R2), and (iii) a gene encoding an outer membrane protein (omp-2) (JPF/JPR). Some modifications on the reported techniques were applied during the present work to improve the outcome. The results showed that the B4/B5 primer pair had the highest sensitivity for detection of positive samples (98%), the JPF/JPR primer pair detected 88.4% of positive samples, whereas F4/R2 primer pair was the least sensitive, being able to detect only 53.1% of positive samples. The specificity of the 3 techniques was 100%. The B4/B5 primer pair was also able to detect the smallest number of bacteria (700 cfu/mL), whereas JPF/JPR was able to detect 7 x 105 cfu/mL and F4/R2 was able to detect 7 x 107 cfu/mL. It is thus concluded that using the B4/B5 primer PCR with the suggested modifications is a robust assay, which meets the sensitivity requirements to be used for testing of human blood samples for brucellosis in the diagnostic laboratory.


Subject(s)
Blood/microbiology , Brucella/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Brucella/genetics , Brucellosis/diagnosis , DNA Primers/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Can J Microbiol ; 53(8): 931-6, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17898849

ABSTRACT

The few studies that have reported the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Saudi Arabia have indicated that a diverse number of circulating MRSA strains have been detected in several major hospitals. Thus, this study was designed to track the presence of MRSA strains in major hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and perform comparative chromosomal DNA analysis of MRSA strains for epidemiological investigation using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Correlation of the PFGE types generated with microbiological and clinical data of the isolates was attempted. Screening for decreased susceptibility to vancomycin among the isolates was also done. A dendogram was generated using PFGE macrorestriction fragments and 6 types were identified (M1-M6) with M1 being predominant and widespread. A clear link between PFGE types and some clinical and microbiological data available for the strains was found. For example, M1 was statistically associated with male patients, whereas the unique types were associated with female patients, M2 was associated with isolates from wounds and age group <5 years, and M4 was associated with isolates from patients admitted to intensive care units. M5 was highly correlated with low sensitivity to linezolid. No vancomycin-resistant isolates were detected.


Subject(s)
Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Cluster Analysis , Cross Infection/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Hospitals , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics
4.
Drug Deliv ; 14(6): 349-56, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17701524

ABSTRACT

Osteomyelitis is an inflammatory bone disease caused by pyogenic bacteria. The advantages of localized biodegradable therapy for osteomyelitis include high local antibiotic concentration at the site of infection and obviation of the need for removal of the implant after treatment. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a biodegradable implantable delivery system containing gatifloxacin (GAT) for the localized treatment of osteomyelitis, experimentally induced by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Implants, prepared by solvent casting technique, showed reasonable tensile strength. DSC examination indicated that GAT is present in an amorphous form in the implant. The in vitro release of GAT showed a profile characterized by an initial burst followed by a second stage of gradual delivery over 27 days. The in vivo release study revealed that GAT concentrations achieved during the first 3 weeks after implantation exceeded the MIC of GAT against MRSA by > 100,000 times. Bacterial tibial bone count performed in rabbits tibia 2 and 4 weeks after implantation of GAT implant in infected bone indicated complete eradication of infection in all treated rabbits as indicated by the significant decrease in bacterial count. The results show that the proposed implant may have a promising role in the therapeutic approach to osteomyelitis.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Carriers/chemistry , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Fluoroquinolones/administration & dosage , Gatifloxacin , In Vitro Techniques , Methicillin Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Polyesters , Rabbits , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Tibia/microbiology
5.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 5: 30, 2006 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17140452

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates with rapid development of resistance. METHODS: A total of 512 MRSA isolates were procured from 6 major hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and antibiotic susceptibilities and MICs were documented against several antibiotics and vancomycin. SPSS version 10 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of MRSA in the study hospitals ranged from 12% to 49.4%. Mean patient age was 44 years with males constituting 64.4% and females 35.6%. Approximately 41.5% of the isolates came from patients in the extreme age groups. MIC for vancomycin was in the susceptible range for all isolates ranging from 0.25 to 3 ug/ml. The overall susceptibility of MRSA to the various antibiotics tested was: fusidic acid 4.3%, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim 33.8%, gentamicin 39.6%, mupirocin 77.0%, gatifloxacin 78.9%, chloramphenicl 80.7%, linezolid 95.1%, quinupristin/dalfopristin 100%. Some differences were noted in the resistance of isolates among the participating hospitals reflecting antibiotic usage. On the whole, inpatient isolates (accounting for 77.5% of the isolates) were more resistant than outpatient isolates (22.5%) except for linezolid. Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid are the most effective antibiotics tested against inpatient isolates while quinupristin-dalfopristin and gatifloxacin seem to be the most effective against outpatient isolates. Approximately one forth of the isolates are no longer susceptible to mupirocin used for eradication of the carrier state reflecting resistance developing after widespread use. Trends over time show a tendency towards decreased susceptibility to gatifloxacin and linezolid with increasing susceptibility to gentamicin and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. CONCLUSION: Quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid are two valuable additions to our antimicrobial armamentarium, but resistance has already been described. To preserve their value, their use should be limited to those rare cases where they are clearly needed. Fusidic acid, the local antibiotic, gentamicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole should not be relied upon for treatment of MRSA infections, at least empirically as the percentage of susceptible isolates is very low.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Hospitals , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Adult , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...