Forced vital capacity trajectories and risk of lung transplant and ILD-related mortality among patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.

We aimed to determine the prevalence and outcomes for forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVCpp) decline among patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). We identified patients with RA-ILD in the Mass General Brigham Healthcare system. RA-ILD diagnosis was determined by review of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging by up to three thoracic radiologists. We abstracted FVCpp measurements, covariates, lung transplant, and ILD-related death from the medical record. We employed a relative FVCpp decline cutoff of > 10% within 24 months. We also used a group-based trajectory model to obtain patterns of change from RA-ILD diagnosis. We then assessed for associations of each FVC decline definition with risk of lung transplant or ILD-related death using multivariable logistic regression. We analyzed 172 patients with RA-ILD with a median of 6 FVCpp measurements per patient over 6.5 years of follow-up (mean age 62.2 years, 36% male). There were seven (4%) lung transplants and 44 (26%) ILD-related deaths. Ninety-eight (57%) patients had relative decline of FVCpp by > 10% in 24 months. We identified three trajectory groups of FVCpp change: rapidly declining (n = 24/168 [14%]), slowly declining (n = 90/168 [54%]), and stable/improving (n = 54/168 [32%]). The rapidly declining group and FVCpp > 10% had adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for lung transplant/ILD-related death of 19.2 (95%CI 4.9 to 75.5) and 2.8 (95%CI 1.3 to 6.1) respectively. Over half of patients with RA-ILD had declining FVCpp. The different trajectory patterns demonstrate the importance of FVC monitoring for identifying patients at the highest risk of poor outcomes. Key Points • Over half of patients with RA-ILD had declining FVCpp over a median of 6.5 years of follow-up. • The rapidly declining FVCpp trajectory group had stronger associations with lung transplant and ILD-related death compared to those with FVCpp decline by > 10%. • Clinicians can employ FVC monitoring to proactively treat patients who are at risk of poor outcomes.

Factors Associated With an Electronic Health Record-Based Definition of Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19 in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with rheumatic disease are at higher risk for severe acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate risk factors for postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) using an electronic health record (EHR)-based definition. METHODS: We identified patients with prevalent rheumatic diseases and COVID-19 within the Mass General Brigham healthcare system. PASC was defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes, relevant labs, vital signs, and medications at least 30 days following the first COVID-19 infection. Patients were followed until the earliest of incident PASC, repeat COVID-19 infection, 1 year of follow-up, death, or February 19, 2023. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate the association of baseline characteristics with PASC risk. RESULTS: Among 2459 patients (76.37% female, mean age 57.4 years), the most common incident PASC manifestations were cough (14.56%), dyspnea (12.36%), constipation (11.39%), and fatigue (10.70%). Serious manifestations including acute coronary disease (4.43%), thromboembolism (3.09%), hypoxemia (3.09%), stroke (1.75%), and myocarditis (0.12%) were rare. The Delta wave (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.82) and Omicron era (aHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41-0.62) were associated with lower risk of PASC than the early pandemic period (March 2020-June 2021). Age, obesity, comorbidity burden, race, and hospitalization for acute COVID-19 infection were associated with greater risk of PASC. Glucocorticoid (GC) use (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.34 compared to no use) was associated with greater risk of PASC. CONCLUSION: Among patients with rheumatic diseases, following their first COVID-19 infection, we found a decreased risk of PASC over calendar time using an EHR-based definition. Aside from GCs, no specific immunomodulatory medications were associated with increased risk, and risk factors were otherwise similar to those seen in the general population.

Effectiveness of a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: an emulated target trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) might have blunted responses to COVID-19 vaccines. The initial mRNA vaccine series is defined as three doses for this population and a fourth booster dose is recommended. The effectiveness of the fourth dose in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using DMARDs is not well established. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of receiving versus not receiving a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine using a target trial framework, in a cohort of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases receiving DMARD therapy. METHODS: We conducted an emulated target trial using observational data from the Mass General Brigham health-care system to compare receiving versus not receiving a fourth mRNA vaccine dose. Analysed patients had systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, were prescribed DMARDs, and were eligible for a fourth dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines between Jan 16 and June 11, 2022. To account for temporal changes, the study period was divided into 1-week intervals. Fourth-dose-exposed patients were included in a 1-week interval if they received a fourth mRNA dose in that interval; fourth-dose-unexposed patients were eligible for but had not received the fourth dose of the vaccine. The primary outcome was a SARS-CoV-2 infection; the secondary outcome was severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (ie, admission to hospital or death within -3 to +14 days of a positive test). We assessed the effectiveness of the fourth dose using time-stratified, overlap propensity score-weighted Cox regression models. FINDINGS: We included 4305 patients, 3126 of whom received a fourth dose of vaccine and 1179 who had not. The median follow-up time was 135 days (IQR 112-154) among patients who had received a fourth dose and 65 days (30-156) among patients who had not received a fourth dose. After overlap weighting in both groups, 1863 (72·7%) of 2563 participants were women, 700 (27·3%) were men, and 2242 (87·5%) were White. Rheumatoid arthritis was present in 1392 (54·3%) of 2563 participants; the most frequent treatments were conventional synthetic DMARDs (1489 [58·1%]) or biological DMARDs (1007 [39·3%]). SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was lower among patients receiving versus not receiving a fourth dose of vaccine (HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·47-0·74]). A fourth dose reduced the risk of admission to hospital or death within -3 to +14 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection (0·35 [0·14-0·85]). INTERPRETATION: In this emulated target trial, a fourth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using DMARDs during the Omicron era. Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases should be encouraged to remain up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccinations. FUNDING: The National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

Effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of antifibrotics in a real-world cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung diseases (RA-ILD). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified RA-ILD patients initiating antifibrotics at Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, a large multi-hospital healthcare system in Boston, MA, USA. We used electronic query to identify all patients with at least 2 RA diagnosis codes and a prescription for either nintedanib or pirfenidone (2014-2023). All analyzed patients met 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for RA and had definite RA-ILD according to Bongartz criteria. Data regarding pulmonary function test (PFT) results, adverse events (AEs), tolerability, and clinical data were collected. A linear mixed model with random intercept was used to compare the within-patient trajectory of the percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp) within 18-months before to 18-months after antifibrotic initiation among those with these PFT data. Lung transplant-free survival and drug retention was estimated in a Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent baseline factors associated with lung transplant or mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 74 patients with RA-ILD that initiated antifibrotics (mean age 67.8 years, 53 % male); 40 patients initiated nintedanib and 34 initiated pirfenidone. Median follow-up was 89 weeks (min 4, max 387). There was a significant improvement in the estimated slope of FVCpp after antifibrotic initiation (-0.3 % per year after initiation compared to -6.2 % per year before antifibrotic initiation, p = 0.03). Nintedanib and pirfenidone had similar FVCpp trajectory. Twenty-six patients (35 %) died and 4 (5 %) had undergone lung transplantation during follow-up. Male sex and heavy smoking were each associated with the composite outcome of lung transplant or mortality. AEs were reported in 41 (55 %) patients, with gastrointestinal (GI) AEs being most common (n = 30). The initial antifibrotic was discontinued in 34 (46 %) patients mostly due to GI AEs (n = 19). The median drug retention time was 142 weeks (95 %CI 56, 262) with no difference between nintedanib and pirfenidone (p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: In this first real-world study of antifibrotic use dedicated to RA-ILD, antifibrotic initiation was associated with a modestly improved trajectory of FVCpp. AEs were frequently reported, particularly GI, and discontinuation was common. However, lung transplant and mortality rates were still high, emphasizing the need for further therapeutic strategies in patients with severe RA-ILD. These real-world data complement previous trial data that investigated efficacy and safety.

Breakthrough COVID-19 After Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab Among Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and baseline factors associated with breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab/cilgavimab among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study among patients with SARDs who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab between January 2, 2022, and November 16, 2022. The primary outcome was breakthrough COVID-19 after tixagevimab/cilgavimab. We performed multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for baseline factors to identify risk factors for breakthrough COVID-19. RESULTS: We identified 444 patients with SARDs who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab (mean age 62.0 years, 78.2% female). There were 83 (18.7%) breakthrough COVID-19 cases (incidence rate 31.5/1000 person-months, 95% CI 24.70-38.24), 7 (1.6%) hospitalizations, and 1 (0.2%) death. Older age was inversely associated with breakthrough COVID-19 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.86/10 years, 95% CI 0.75-0.99). Higher baseline spike antibody levels were associated with lower risk of breakthrough COVID-19 (aHR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.99 for spike antibody levels > 200 vs < 0.4 units). CD20 inhibitor users had a similar risk of breakthrough COVID-19 (aHR 1.05, 95% CI 0.44-2.49) compared to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) users. CONCLUSION: We found that patients with SARDs had frequent breakthrough COVID-19, but the proportion experiencing severe COVID-19 was low. DMARD type, including CD20 inhibitors, did not significantly affect risk of breakthrough COVID-19. Evidence of prior humoral immunity was protective against breakthrough infection, highlighting the continued need for a multimodal approach to prevent severe COVID-19 as novel PrEP therapies are being developed.

Associations of DMARDs with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the baseline disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) risk among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: Patients with SARDs and confirmed COVID-19 infection at Mass General Brigham completed a survey ≥28 days after positive PCR/Antigen test to prospectively investigate their COVID-19 courses. We investigated DMARD use at COVID-19 onset and PASC risk. PASC was defined as any COVID-19 symptom that persisted for ≥28 days. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) for PASC by DMARD class. We also used restricted mean survival time to determine the difference in symptom-free days by DMARD class in the 28-day period after infection. RESULTS: We analyzed 510 patients with SARDs and COVID-19 from 11/Mar/2021-17/Jun/2023; 202 (40%) developed PASC. CD20 inhibitor (CD20i) users had significantly higher odds of developing PASC vs csDMARD users (adjusted OR 2.69, 95%CI 1.23-5.88). IL-12/23, IL-17A, or IL-23 inhibitor (IL-12/23i, IL-17Ai, IL-23i) users also had significantly higher odds of PASC (adjusted OR 3.03, 95%CI 1.08-8.49). CD20i users had significantly fewer symptom-free days vs csDMARD users (adjusted -4.12, 95%CI -7.29 to -0.94). CONCLUSION: CD20i users had significantly higher odds of PASC and fewer symptom-free days over the 28 days following COVID-19 diagnosis compared with csDMARD users. Further research is needed to investigate whether PASC risk in CD20i users may be due to prolonged infection or other immune mechanisms. The association of IL-12/23i, IL-17Ai, and IL-23i and PASC calls for additional study.

Risk factors and outcomes for repeat COVID-19 infection among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors and outcomes of repeat COVID-19 infections among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We performed a case-control study investigating repeat COVID-19 infection within the Mass General Brigham Health Care System. We systematically identified all SARD patients with confirmed COVID-19 (15/Mar/2020 to 17/Oct/2022). Cases had confirmed repeat COVID-19 infections >60 days apart (index date: repeat COVID-19 date). Controls were matched to cases (up to 3:1) by calendar date of first infection and duration between first COVID-19 infection and index dates. We collected demographics, lifestyle, comorbidities, SARD features, and COVID-19 characteristics at initial infection and index date by medical record review. We used conditional logistic regression to identify associations with repeat COVID-19 infection, adjusting for potential confounders. We described the severity of repeat COVID-19 infection among cases. RESULTS: Among 2203 SARD patients with COVID-19, we identified 76 cases with repeat COVID-19 infection (80.3 % female) and matched to 207 matched controls (77.8 % female) with no repeat infection. At first infection, cases were younger (mean 49.5 vs. 60.3 years, p < 0.0001), less likely to have hypertension (32.9 % vs. 45.9 %, p = 0.050), and less likely to have been hospitalized for COVID-19 (13.2 % vs. 24.6 %, p = 0.037) than controls. At index date, cases were more likely than controls to be rituximab users (18.4 % vs. 6.3 %, p = 0.0021). In the multivariable model, younger age (OR 0.67 per 10 years, 95 %CI 0.54-0.82), rituximab use vs. non-use (OR 3.38, 95 %CI 1.26-9.08), and methotrexate use vs. non-use (OR 2.24, 95 %CI 1.08-4.61) were each associated with repeat COVID-19 infection. Among those with repeat COVID-19 infection, 5/76 (6.6 %) were hospitalized and there were no deaths. CONCLUSION: Younger age, rituximab, and methotrexate were each associated with repeat COVID-19 infection risk among patients with SARDs. Reassuringly, there were no deaths, and the hospitalization rate was low among those with repeat COVID-19 infection.

Immunomodulators and risk for breakthrough infection after third COVID-19 mRNA vaccine among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cohort study.

Objectives: To investigate COVID-19 breakthrough infection after third mRNA vaccine dose among patients with RA by immunomodulator drug class, and we hypothesized that CD20 inhibitors (CD20i) would have higher risk for breakthrough COVID-19 vs. TNF inhibitors (TNFi). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study investigating breakthrough COVID-19 among RA patients at Mass General Brigham in Boston, MA, USA. Patients were followed from the date of 3rd vaccine dose until breakthrough COVID-19, death, or end of follow-up (18/Jan/2023). Covariates included demographics, lifestyle, comorbidities, and prior COVID-19. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate breakthrough COVID-19 risk by immunomodulator drug class. We used propensity score (PS) overlap-weighting to compare users of CD20i vs. TNFi. Results: We analyzed 5781 patients with RA that received 3 mRNA vaccine doses (78.8% female, mean age 64.2 years). During mean follow-up of 12.8 months, 1173 (20.2%) had breakthrough COVID_19. Use of CD20i (adjusted HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.30-2.33) and glucocorticoid monotherapy (adjusted HR 1.47, 95%CI 1.09-1.98) were each associated with breakthrough COVID-19 compared to TNFi use. In the PS overlap-weighted analysis, CD20i users also had higher breakthrough COVID-19 risk than TNFi users (HR 1.62, 95%CI 1.02-2.56). A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with cancer or interstitial lung disease yielded similar findings. Conclusions: We identified CD20i and glucocorticoid monotherapy as risk factors for breakthrough COVID-19 among patients with RA after a 3rd vaccine dose. This contemporary study highlights the real-world impact of blunted immune responses in these subgroups and the need for effective risk mitigation strategies.

Outcomes with and without outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with COVID-19 and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Some patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease and immunosuppression might still be at risk of severe COVID-19. The effect of outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments on COVID-19 outcomes among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease is unclear. We aimed to evaluate temporal trends, severe outcomes, and COVID-19 rebound among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease and COVID-19 who received outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment compared with those who did not receive outpatient treatment. Methods: We did a retrospective cohort study at Mass General Brigham Integrated Health Care System, Boston, MA, USA. We included patients aged 18 years or older with a pre-existing systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, who had COVID-19 onset between Jan 23 and May 30, 2022. We identified COVID-19 by positive PCR or antigen test (index date defined as the date of first positive test) and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases using diagnosis codes and immunomodulator prescription. Outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments were confirmed by medical record review. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as hospitalisation or death within 30 days after the index date. COVID-19 rebound was defined as documentation of a negative SARS-CoV-2 test after treatment followed by a newly positive test. The association of outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment versus no outpatient treatment with severe COVID-19 outcomes was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Findings: Between Jan 23 and May 30, 2022, 704 patients were identified and included in our analysis (mean age 58·4 years [SD 15·9]; 536 [76%] were female and 168 [24%] were male, 590 [84%] were White and 39 [6%] were Black, and 347 [49%] had rheumatoid arthritis). Outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments increased in frequency over calendar time (p<0·0001). A total of 426 (61%) of 704 patients received outpatient treatment (307 [44%] with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, 105 [15%] with monoclonal antibodies, five [1%] with molnupiravir, three [<1%] with remdesivir, and six [1%] with combination treatment). There were nine (2·1%) hospitalisations or deaths among 426 patients who received outpatient treatment compared with 49 (17·6%) among 278 who did not receive outpatient treatment (odds ratio [adjusted for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and kidney function] 0·12, 95% CI 0·05-0·25). 25 (7·9%) of 318 patients who received oral outpatient treatment had documented COVID-19 rebound. Interpretation: Outpatient treatment was associated with lower odds of severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with no outpatient treatment. These findings highlight the importance of outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease and COVID-19 and the need for further research on COVID-19 rebound. Funding: None.

Impact of vaccination on postacute sequelae of SARS CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination decreases the risk of severe COVID-19 but its impact on postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) is unclear among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) who may have blunted vaccine immunogenicity and be vulnerable to PASC. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with SARD from a large healthcare system who survived acute infection to complete surveys. The symptom-free duration and the odds of PASC (any symptom lasting ≥28 or 90 days) were evaluated using restricted mean survival time and multivariable logistic regression, respectively, among those with and without breakthrough infection (≥14 days after initial vaccine series). RESULTS: Among 280 patients (11% unvaccinated; 48% partially vaccinated; 41% fully vaccinated), the mean age was 53 years, 80% were female and 82% were white. The most common SARDs were inflammatory arthritis (59%) and connective tissue disease (24%). Those with breakthrough infection had more upper respiratory symptoms, and those with non-breakthrough infection had more anosmia, dysgeusia and joint pain. Compared with those with non-breakthrough COVID-19 infection (n=164), those with breakthrough infection (n=116) had significantly more symptom-free days over the follow-up period (+21.4 days, 95% CI 0.95 to 41.91; p=0.04) and lower odds of PASC at 28 and 90 days (adjusted OR, aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.83 and aOR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.22, respectively). CONCLUSION: Vaccinated patients with SARDs were less likely to experience PASC compared with those not fully vaccinated. While we cannot rule out the possibility that findings may be due to intrinsic differences in PASC risk from different SARS-CoV-2 variants, these findings support the benefits of vaccination for patients with SARDs and suggest that the immune response to acute infection is important in the pathogenesis of PASC in patients with SARDs.

Outcomes with and without outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with COVID-19 and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To investigate temporal trends, severe outcomes, and rebound among systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) patients according to outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study investigating outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments among SARD patients at Mass General Brigham (23/Jan/2022-30/May/2022). We identified SARS-CoV-2 infection by positive PCR or antigen test (index date=first positive test) and SARDs using diagnosis codes and immunomodulator prescription. Outpatient treatments were confirmed by medical record review. The primary outcome was hospitalization or death within 30 days following the index date. COVID-19 rebound was defined as documentation of negative then newly-positive SARS-CoV-2 tests. The association of any vs. no outpatient treatment with hospitalization/death was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: We analyzed 704 SARD patients with COVID-19 (mean age 58.4 years, 76% female, 49% with rheumatoid arthritis). Treatment as outpatient increased over calendar time (p<0.001). A total of 426(61%) received outpatient treatment: 307(44%) with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 105(15%) with monoclonal antibodies, 5(0.7%) with molnupiravir, 3(0.4%) with outpatient remdesivir, and 6(0.9%) with combinations. There were 9/426 (2.1%) hospitalizations/deaths among those treated as outpatient compared to 49/278 (17.6%) among those with no outpatient treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.12, 0.05 to 0.25). 25/318 (8%) of patients who received oral outpatient treatment had documented COVID-19 rebound. Conclusion: Outpatient treatment was strongly associated with lower odds of severe COVID-19 compared to no outpatient treatment. At least 8% of SARD patients experienced COVID-19 rebound. These findings highlight the importance of outpatient COVID-19 treatment for SARD patients and the need for further research on rebound. What is already known on this topic?: Previous studies suggest that monoclonal antibodies are an effective outpatient treatment option for patients at high-risk of severe COVID-19, including those with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir are recently-authorized effective oral outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment options, but clinical trials were performed among the general population, mostly among unvaccinated and prior to Omicron viral variants.Oral outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments may result in COVID-19 rebound, characterized by newly-positive COVID-19 testing and recurrent symptoms, but no studies have investigated rebound prevalence among SARD patients. What this study adds?: This is one of the first studies investigating outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatments among SARD patients that includes oral options and quantifies the prevalence of COVID-19 rebound.Outpatient treatment was associated with 88% reduced odds of severe COVID-19 compared to no treatment.At least 8% of SARDs receiving oral outpatient treatment experienced COVID-19 rebound. How this study might affect research practice or policy?: These results should encourage clinicians to prescribe and SARD patients to seek prompt outpatient COVID-19 treatment.This research provides an early estimate of the prevalence of COVID-19 rebound after oral outpatient treatment to quantify this risk to clinicians and SARD patients and encourage future research.

Defining the Current Landscape, Attitudes, and Perceived Barriers of Virtual Medicine in Underserved Populations.

PURPOSE: Virtual medicine (VM) use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as it represented a safe alternative to traditional face-to-face health care delivery. This prospective cross-sectional study aimed to characterize preferences and perceived barriers to VM on the basis of language and specific sociodemographic variables while also identifying particular subpopulations at risk of dissatisfaction regarding VM. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved, 23-item questionnaire was offered in English and Spanish. Examined variables included demographic information, preferences, and perceived barriers regarding VM. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the association between demographic variables and participants' preferences and perceived barriers. RESULTS: Fewer Hispanic and underserved patients (N = 241) had received oncological care through VM (28.9% v 30.8%) despite comparable preferences and levels of satisfaction regarding the incorporation of VM in health care delivery (21.6% v 25.4%; 68.7% v 82.1%), respectively, with no significant difference by age, level of education, marital status, or Hispanic ethnicity, although Spanish as primary language was statistically significant (P = .001). Although Hispanic and underserved rely more on social media to receive health information (26.5% v 24.7%), they have more technical barriers. They were up to 2.9 times more likely not to have a phone/iPad/similar or access broadband connectivity. CONCLUSION: Given the shift toward outpatient and home-based care, an aging population, and cultural appropriations, VM excitedly allows the reincorporation of family/caregiver in medical engagement. Hispanic patients are equally interested and satisfied in receiving oncological care through VM, but fewer are currently using it. Barriers are predominantly technical and targetable with appropriate policies to help overcome technological barriers on the basis of language, ethnic, locoregional, and sociodemographic variables.