Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir ; 55(6): 443-449, 2023 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming increasingly important in today's patient care. Unfortunately, the most common PROMs in hand surgery are very time-consuming and usually do not cover the actual, diagnosis-specific complaints of the patients. For diagnosis and follow-up of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis, Noback et al. developed and validated the Thumb Disability Examination (TDX) questionnaire. This 20-item questionnaire specifically assesses daily living limitations and pain as well as patient-reported satisfaction of thumb function. The aim of this study is to validate the German translation of the TDX, the Thumb Disability Examination - German (TDX-G), and to compare it with the German-language versions of the MHQ and qDASH, which are currently used as gold standard. MATERIAL UND METHODS: Translation and back-translation were performed in accordance with accepted guidelines. For statistical validation of the TDX-G, 30 consecutive patients with thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis were interviewed under standardised conditions. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was determined in 10 patients who completed the TDX-G twice at an interval of 2 weeks. The validity of the TDX-G was determined by calculating the correlation coefficients of the TDX-G with the MHQ and qDASH, subjective pain sensation (NRS), and hand strength levels (coarse and pinch strength). In addition, the time to collect each questionnaire was compared. RESULTS: The TDX-G has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.932) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.963 [0.850-0.991]). There is a significant correlation between TDX-G and MHQ (- 0.782; p<0.001) and qDASH (0.833; p<0.001). All questionnaires correlate significantly with pain on exertion and pinch force, with the TDX-G having the highest correlation in each case. Significantly less time is needed to record the TDX-G (110±28 s) than to record the MHQ (413±98 s). CONCLUSION: The TDX-G is a reliable tool for diagnosing and monitoring the progression of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. It can be used in both patient care and clinical research and accurately mirrors the symptoms.


Subject(s)
Carpometacarpal Joints , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Carpometacarpal Joints/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Thumb/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Pain , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...