Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 147
Filter
2.
Am Heart J Plus ; 12: 100067, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38559603

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite limited randomized trial data demonstrating clinical efficacy, the utilization of Impella in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) has increased over time. Methods: We identified 75,769 hospitalizations with STEMI complicated by CS between October 2015 and December 2018 using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. From this cohort, hospitalizations were stratified according to IABP or Impella placement. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were divided into efficacy, safety, and device-related complications. Propensity-score matching was used to account for differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups. Logistic regression was performed to get the odds ratio and confidence intervals. Results: Among 75,769 admissions with STEMI and CS, hospitalizations with <18 years old, both IABP and Impella placement, and who underwent ECMO and/or LVAD implantation were excluded. After the exclusion, out of 72,791 admissions, 25,260 (34.70%) hospitalizations received IABP, and 7825 (10.75%) received Impella support. After propensity score-matched analysis, 7345 hospitalizations were included in each group. All-cause in-hospital mortality was higher in the hospitalizations requiring Impella support as compared to IABP (42.10% vs. 31.54%, adjusted OR 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60-1.84, P < 0.0001). Impella was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital complications and hospitalization cost compared with IABP. Conclusion: Impella compared with IABP in STEMI patients with CS was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and other adverse clinical and procedural outcomes.

5.
Int J Cardiol ; 278: 186-191, 2019 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30579719

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heart Failure (HF) is a major driver of the readmissions/penalties in the US. Although extensive literature on rehospitalization attributed to HF, studies to compare outcomes for same-hospital vs. different-hospital readmissions are sparse. METHODS: Nationwide Readmission Database from 2010 to 14 utilized for HF-related hospitalization using appropriate ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes. 30-day readmissions were classified into two groups: same-hospital and different-hospital. A comparative analysis was conducted focusing on: in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization cost. Hierarchical two-level modeling and propensity score matching utilized to adjust confounders. RESULTS: 715,993 HF readmissions were identified, of which 21.3% were readmitted to different-hospital. Elderly, females, patients with higher co-morbidities and higher median household income were less likely to be readmitted to different-hospital. Index hospitalizations in a teaching hospital and/or larger hospital were associated with reduced different-hospital readmissions. Readmissions to the different hospital were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (7.7% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001), higher resource utilization (LOS:7.5 days vs. 6.1 days, p < 0.001 and Cost: $22,602 vs. $13,740, p < 0.001) after adjusting for propensity score match. Similar results were observed with propensity score matching of multiple high-risk subgroups. CONCLUSION: Resources should be directed towards minimizing different-hospital HF readmissions to improve patient outcomes by identifying the vulnerable subgroup and further tailoring in-hospital and post-discharge care.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Hospital Mortality/trends , Length of Stay/trends , Patient Readmission/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heart Failure/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission/economics , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
6.
Vascular ; 26(6): 615-625, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29973108

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the published literature has reported an inverse association between hospital volume and outcomes of coronary interventions, sparse data are available for percutaneous peripheral atherectomy (PPA). The aim of our study was to examine the effect of hospital volume on outcomes of PPA. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database of the year 2012, PPA with ICD-9 code of 17.56 was identified. The primary outcomes were mortality and amputation rates; secondary outcomes were peri-procedural complications, cost, and length of hospitalization and discharge disposition of the patient. Multivariate models were generated for predictors of the outcomes. RESULTS: We identified a total of 21,015 patients with mean age of 69.53 years, with 56% males. Higher hospital volume centers were associated with a significantly lower mortality (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.57, p < 0.0001), amputation rates (5.34% vs. 9.32%, p < 0.0001), combined endpoint of mortality and complications (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.49-0.58, p < 0.0001), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (4.86 vs. 6.79 days, p < 0.0001) and lower hospitalization cost ($23,062 vs. $30,794, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis for acute and chronic limb ischemia showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Hospital procedure volume is an independent predictor of mortality, amputation rates, complications, LOS, and costs in patients undergoing PPA with an inverse relationship.


Subject(s)
Atherectomy/methods , Hospitals, High-Volume , Hospitals, Low-Volume , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Process Assessment, Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Surgical , Atherectomy/adverse effects , Atherectomy/economics , Atherectomy/mortality , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospital Costs , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Low-Volume/economics , Humans , Inpatients , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/economics , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 29(10): 1425-1435, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) has increased significantly, since its initial approval for use in selected patients with heart failure. Limited data exist as for current trends in implant-related in-hospital complications and cost utilization. The aim of our study was to examine in-hospital complication rates associated with CRT-D and their trends over the last decade. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we estimated 378 248 CRT-D procedures from 2003 to 2012. We investigated common complications, including mechanical, cardiovascular, pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in-hospital deaths described with CRT-D, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. Mechanical complications (5.9%) were the commonest, followed by cardiovascular (3.6%), respiratory failure (2.4%), and pneumothorax (1.5%). Age (≥65 years), female gender (OR, 95% CI; P value) (1.08, 1.03-1.13; 0.001), and the Charlson score ≥3 (1.52, 1.45-1.60; <0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality/complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing CRT-D has been increasing in the last decade. Age (≥65), female sex, and the Charlson score ≥3 were associated with higher complications. In patients who underwent CRT-D implantation, postoperative complications were associated with significant increases in cost.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/economics , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/economics , Defibrillators, Implantable/economics , Electric Countershock/economics , Heart Failure/economics , Heart Failure/therapy , Hospital Costs , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/mortality , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/trends , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/trends , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Defibrillators, Implantable/trends , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Electric Countershock/mortality , Electric Countershock/trends , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
Resuscitation ; 127: 105-113, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29674141

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the trends and predictors of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use in patients hospitalized after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding MCS use in patients hospitalized after OHCA. METHODS: We conducted an observational analysis of MCS use in 960,428 patients hospitalized after OHCA between January 2008 and December 2014 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. On multivariable analysis, we also assessed factors associated with MCS use and survival to discharge. RESULTS: Among the 960,428 patients, 51,863 (5.4%) had MCS utilized. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was the most commonly used MCS after OHCA with frequency of 47,061 (4.9%), followed by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) 3650 (0.4%), and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVAD) 3265 (0.3%). From 2008 to 2014, there was an increase in the utilization of MCS from 5% in 2008 to 5.7% in 2014 (P trend < 0.001). There was a non-significant decline in the use of IABP from 4.9% to 4.7% (P trend = 0.95), whereas PVAD use increased from 0.04% to 0.7% (P trend < 0.001), and ECMO use increased from 0.1% to 0.7% (P trend < 0.001) during the study period. Younger, male patients with myocardial infarction, higher co-morbid conditions, VT/VF as initial rhythm, and presentation to a large urban hospital were more likely to receive percutaneous MCS implantation. Survival to discharge was significantly higher in patients who were selected to receive MCS (56.9% vs. 43.1%, OR: 1.16, 95% CI: (1.11-1.21), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a steady increase in the use of MCS in OHCA, especially PVAD and ECMO, despite lack of randomized clinical trial data supporting an improvement in outcomes. More definitive randomized studies are needed to assess accurately the optimal role of MCS in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/statistics & numerical data , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/statistics & numerical data , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology
9.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 29(5): 715-724, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is widely accepted intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, but limited data are available regarding contemporary trends in major complications and in-hospital mortality due to the procedure. This study was aimed at exploring the temporal trends of in-hospital mortality, major complications, and impact of hospital volume on frequency of AF ablation-related outcomes. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify the AF patients treated with catheter ablation. In-hospital death and common complications including vascular access complications, cardiac perforation and/or tamponade, pneumothorax, stroke, and transient ischemic attack, were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD-9-CM) codes. RESULT: In-hospital mortality rate of 0.15% and overall complication rate of 5.46% were noted among AF ablation recipients (n = 50,969). Significant increase in complications during study period (relative increase 56.37%, P-trend < 0.001) was observed. Cardiac (2.65%), vascular (1.33%), and neurological (1.05%) complications were most common. On multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]; P value), significant predictors of complications were female sex (OR = 1.40; CI = 1.17-1.68; P value < 0.001), high burden of comorbidity as indicated by Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR = 2.84; CI = 2.29-3.52; P value < 0.001), and low hospital volume (< 50 procedures). CONCLUSION: Our study noted a decline in AF ablation-related hospitalizations and complications associated with the procedure. These findings largely reflect shifting trends of outpatient performance of the procedure and increasing safety profile due to improved institutional expertise and catheter techniques.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Inpatients , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitals, High-Volume/trends , Hospitals, Low-Volume/trends , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge/trends , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
10.
Int J Cardiol ; 250: 128-132, 2018 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29030143

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We examined the effect of AF a commonly encountered arrhythmia with significant morbidity on mortality following a motor vehicle accident (MVA) related hospitalization. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to identify patients with AF (ICD-9 CM 427.31) and MVA (ICD-9 CM E810.0-E819.9), considered separately and together, from 2003 through 2012. Baseline characteristics were identified and multilevel mixed model multivariate analysis was employed to verify the impact of AF on in-patient mortality in survivors. RESULTS: Of an estimated 2,978,630 MVA admissions reported, 79,687 (2.6%) hospitalizations also had a diagnosis of AF. The in-hospital mortality was 2.6% in MVA alone and 7.6% in MVA and AF. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model (TMPM), and hospital characteristics, AF was independently associated with in-hospital mortality [Odds ratio (OR) 1.52, confidence interval (CI) 1.41-1.69, P value<0.0001]. In patients with MVA and AF, increasing age, CCI, and TMPM were associated with higher mortality. Female gender is associated with lower mortality (OR 0.84, CI 0.81-0.88, P -0.0016). Most patients with MVA and AF had a CHADS2 score of 2 (34.6%). Mortality and transfusion rates were higher in MVA and AF patients compared to patients with MVA alone across all CHADS2 scores. CONCLUSION: In patients with a MVA, the presence of AF is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/mortality , Accidents, Traffic/trends , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Databases, Factual/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Vehicles , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 91(6): 1171-1181, 2018 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29152829

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are sparse clinical data on the procedural trends, outcomes and readmission rates following FDA approval and expansion of Transcatheter mitral valve repair/MitraClip® . Whether a complex new technology can be disseminated safely and quickly is controversial. METHODS: The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Data (NRD) 2013-14. MitraClip® was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality + procedural complications. Secondary outcome included 30-day readmissions. Hierarchical two level logistic models were used to evaluate study outcomes. RESULTS: Our analysis included 2003 MitraClip® procedures. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.9%. As expected, there was a significant increase in procedural volume post-FDA approval. Importantly, a corresponding downward trend in mortality and procedural complications was observed. Significant predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications included the use of vasopressors (P <0.001) and hemodynamic support (P < 0.001). Higher hospital volume (≥10 MitraClips/year) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and complications (P = 0.02). There were 304 (15.1%) 30-day readmissions, with heart failure being the most common cause of readmission. Elective procedures had lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001) and lower readmission rates (P = 0.011) compared with nonelective procedures. CONCLUSION: A significant increase in MitraClip® procedural volumes occurred post-FDA approval. Overall morbidity and mortality were low and trended downwards. Hospital procedure volume ≥10 cases were associated with lower mortality and overall complication rates. These data suggest a successful roll out of a very complex novel structural heart procedure.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/trends , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/trends , Heart Valve Prosthesis/trends , Mitral Valve/surgery , Patient Readmission/trends , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Databases, Factual , Device Approval , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitals, High-Volume/trends , Hospitals, Low-Volume/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult
12.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 17(6): 579-585, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29017405

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have traditionally been excluded from large randomized clinical trials involving transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR). Technical enhancements, availability of new generation devices and improved outcomes have led to a marked increase in TAVR volume across the world including off label use in patients with BAV stenosis. Areas covered: In this manuscript, we have reviewed the currently available data regarding safety, efficacy, and outcomes of TAVR in patients with BAV stenosis. 11 large observational studies with near 1300 patients with BAV stenosis were included to summarizes outcomes of TAVR. Expert Commentary: The present review suggested that TAVR may be a safe and feasible treatment modality in BAV stenosis patients. New generation devices were associated with high device success rate whereas higher adverse procedural events were observed in early generation devices. There are no differences in post procedural outcomes with new generation TAVR devices for BAV when compared to tricuspid aortic anatomy. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcome and durability of TAVR in patients with BAV.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/abnormalities , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aortic Valve/pathology , Aortic Valve/surgery , Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease , Equipment Design , Heart Valve Diseases/pathology , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome
13.
Am J Cardiol ; 120(9): 1653-1661, 2017 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28882336

ABSTRACT

There are sparse comparative data on in-hospital outcomes and readmission rates in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who receive systemic thrombolytics versus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Database 2013 to 2014, subset of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Systemic and CDT were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions and secondary outcome was combined in-hospital mortality + gastrointestinal bleed + intracranial hemorrhage. We used propensity score match analysis without replacement using Greedy's algorithm to adjust for possible confounders. We identified a total of 4,426 patients (3,107: systemic thrombolysis and 1,319: CDT) with acute PE who were treated with thrombolysis. In our 2:1 propensity score algorithm, in-hospital mortality was lower in the CDT group (6.12%) versus systemic thrombolytics (14.94%) (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.49, p <0.001). There was also a lower composite secondary outcome (in-hospital mortality + gastrointestinal bleed + intracranial hemorrhage) in patients who received CDT (8.42%) versus those who received systemic thrombolytics (18.13%) (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.53, p <0.001). Thirty-day readmission was lower in patients with CDT group (7.65%) compared with systemic thrombolytics (10.58%, p = 0.009). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality, as well as bleeding during primary admission was significantly lower with CDT compared with systemic thrombolytics for patients with acute PE. There was also significant decrease in rate of readmissions among patients receiving CDT compared with systemic thrombolytics.


Subject(s)
Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Acute Disease , Aged , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission , Propensity Score , Pulmonary Embolism/mortality , Treatment Outcome
15.
Am J Cardiol ; 120(4): 616-624, 2017 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28648393

ABSTRACT

An estimated half of all heart failure (HF) populations has been categorized to have diastolic HF (DHF), but sparse data are available describing etiologies and predictors of 30-day readmission in DHF population. The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Database 2013 to 2014, a subset of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. DHF was identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 428.3x in primary diagnosis field. Readmission etiologies were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code in primary diagnosis field. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. In total, 192,394 patients with DHF were included, of which 40,927 (21.27%) patients were readmitted with total readmissions of 47,056 within 30 days. Predictors of increased readmissions were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.002, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001 to 1.0003, p <0.001), diabetes (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.11, p <0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.21, p <0.001), renal failure (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.25, p <0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09, p = 0.002), anemia (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.15, p <0.001), transfusion during index admission (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.23, p <0.001), discharge to the facility (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.16, p <0.001), length of stay >2 days, and Charlson comorbidity index ≥3, whereas obesity (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.85, p <0.001), elective admissions (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.94, p <0.001), and non-Medicare/Medicaid primary payer were predictors of lower readmission rate. Most common etiologies of readmission were acute HF (28.01%), infections (9.54%), acute kidney injury (5.35%), acute respiratory failure (4.86%), and pneumonia (3.92%). In conclusion, DHF population with higher comorbidity burden, longer length of stay, and discharge to facility were prone to increased readmissions, with most common etiologies of readmission being HF, infections, and acute kidney injury.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Heart Failure, Diastolic/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Readmission/trends , Stroke Volume/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure, Diastolic/epidemiology , Heart Failure, Diastolic/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity/trends , Odds Ratio , Patient Discharge/trends , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
Curr Hypertens Rev ; 13(1): 41-45, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28245786

ABSTRACT

Aortic stenosis (AS) has an increasing prevalence with age and is commonly associated with hypertension. While it has been established that hypertension is associated with increased mortality in patients with AS, further randomized control trials addressing the use of antihypertensives specifically in patients with AS are needed. The management of hypertension in patients with AS needs a cautious approach due to complex hemodynamic and structural changes involved. Comorbidities like coronary artery disease, heart failure and arrhythmias further dictate management of hypertension in patients with AS. The aim of this article is to review the various agents used in the management of hypertension in patients with AS.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/mortality
18.
Am J Med ; 130(6): 678-687.e7, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28161344

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The nationwide prevalence of cannabis use/abuse has more than doubled from 2002 to 2011. Whether the outpatient trend is reflected in the inpatient setting is unknown. We examined the prevalence and incidence of cannabis abuse/dependence as determined by discharge coding in a 10-year (2002-2011) National Inpatient Sample, as well as various trends among demographics, comorbidities, and hospitalization outcomes. METHODS: Cannabis abuse/dependence was identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes 304.3* and 305.2* in adults aged 18 years or more. We excluded cases coded "in remission." National estimates of trends and matched-regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Overall, 2,833,567 (0.91%) admissions with documented cannabis abuse/dependence were identified, patients had a mean age of 35.12 ± 0.06 years, 62% were male, and there was an increasing trend in prevalence from 0.52% to 1.34% (P <.001). The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 0.47 ± 0.006, and inpatient mortality was 0.41%. All of the above demonstrated an increasing trend (P <.001). Mean length of stay was 6.23 ± 0.06 days. The top primary discharge diagnoses were schizoaffective/mood disorders, followed by psychotic disorders and alcoholism. Asthma prevalence in nontobacco smokers had a steeper increase in the cannabis subgroup than in the noncannabis subgroup (P = .002). Among acute pancreatitis admissions, cannabis abusers had a shorter length of stay (-11%) and lower hospitalization costs (-7%) than nonabusers. CONCLUSION: Cannabis abuse/dependence is on the rise in the inpatient population, with an increasing trend toward older and sicker patients with increasing rates of moderate to severe disability. Psychiatric disorders and alcoholism are the main associated primary conditions. Cannabis abuse is associated with increased asthma incidence in nontobacco smokers and decreased hospital resource use in acute pancreatitis admissions.


Subject(s)
Marijuana Abuse/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Asthma/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pancreatitis/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
19.
Am J Cardiol ; 119(5): 760-769, 2017 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109560

ABSTRACT

Heart failure (HF) is the most common discharge diagnosis across the United States, and these patients are particularly vulnerable to readmissions, increasing attention to potential ways to address the problem. The study cohort was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Readmission Data 2013, sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HF was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Readmission was defined as a subsequent hospital admission within 30 days after discharge day of index admission. Readmission causes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes in primary diagnosis filed. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Hierarchical 2-level logistic models were used to evaluate study outcomes. From a total 301,892 principal admissions (73.4% age ≥65 years and 50.6% men), 55,857 (18.5%) patients were readmitted with a total of 64,264 readmissions during the study year. Among the etiologies of readmission, cardiac causes (49.8%) were most common (HF being most common followed by coronary artery disease and arrhythmias), whereas pulmonary causes were responsible for 13.1% and renal causes for 8.9% of the readmissions. Significant predictors of increased 30-day readmission included diabetes (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, p value: 1.06, 1.03 to 1.08, p <0.001), chronic lung disease (1.13, 1.11 to 1.16, p <0.001), renal failure/electrolyte imbalance (1.12, 1.10 to 1.15, p <0.001), discharge to facilities (1.07, 1.04 to 1.09, p <0.001), lengthier hospital stay, and transfusion during index admission. In conclusion, readmission after a hospitalization for HF is common. Although it may be necessary to readmit some patients, the striking rate of readmission demands efforts to further clarify the determinants of readmission and develop strategies in terms of quality of care and care transitions to prevent this adverse outcome.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Water-Electrolyte Imbalance/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Chronic Disease , Comorbidity , Coronary Artery Disease , Female , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Income/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Diseases , Logistic Models , Lung Diseases , Male , Medicaid , Medicare , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission/trends , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
20.
Am J Med ; 130(6): 688-698, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outcomes related to chest pain associated with cocaine use and its burden on the healthcare system are not well studied. METHODS: Data were collected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2001-2012). Subjects were identified by using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Primary outcome was a composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiac arrest. RESULTS: We identified 363,143 admissions for cocaine-induced chest pain. Mean age was 44.9 (±21.1) years with male predominance. Left heart catheterizations were performed in 6.7%, whereas the frequency of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary interventions were 0.69% and 0.22%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality was 0.09%, and the primary outcome occurred in 1.19% of patients. Statistically significant predictors of primary outcome included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.35; P = .046), age >50 years (OR, 1.24, CI, 1.07-1.43; P = .004), history of heart failure (OR, 1.63, CI, 1.37-1.93; P <.001), supraventricular tachycardia (OR, 2.94, CI, 1.34-6.42; P = .007), endocarditis (OR, 3.5, CI, 1.50-8.18, P = .004), tobacco use (OR, 1.3, CI, 1.13-1.49; P <.001), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.5, CI, 1.29-1.77; P <.001), coronary artery disease (OR, 2.37, CI, 2.03-2.76; P <.001), and renal failure (OR, 1.27, CI, 1.08-1.50; P = .005). The total annual projected economic burden ranged from $155 to $226 million with a cumulative accruement of more than $2 billion over a decade. CONCLUSION: Hospital admissions due to chest pain and concomitant cocaine use are associated with low rates of adverse outcomes. For the low-risk cohort in whom acute coronary syndrome has been ruled out, hospitalization may not be beneficial and may result in unnecessary cardiac procedures.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/etiology , Cocaine-Related Disorders/complications , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Chest Pain/therapy , Cost of Illness , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Risk Factors , Tobacco Use Disorder/complications , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...