Cost and operational context for national human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine delivery in six low- and middle-income countries.

INTRODUCTION: There are concerns from immunization program planners about high delivery costs for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Most prior research evaluated costs of HPV vaccine delivery during demonstration projects or at introduction, showing relatively high costs, which may not reflect the costs beyond the pilot or introduction years. This study sought to understand the operational context and estimate delivery costs for HPV vaccine in six national programs, beyond their introduction years. METHODS: Operational research and microcosting methods were used to retrospectively collect primary data on HPV vaccination program activities in Ethiopia, Guyana, Rwanda, Senegal, Sri Lanka, and Uganda. Data were collected from the national level and a sample of subnational administrative offices and health facilities. Operational data collected were tabulated as percentages and frequencies. Financial costs (monetary outlays) and economic costs (financial plus opportunity costs) were estimated, as was the cost per HPV vaccine dose delivered. Costing was done from the health system perspective and reported in 2019 United States dollars (US$). RESULTS: Across the study countries, between 53 % and 99 % of HPV vaccination sessions were conducted in schools. Differences were observed in intensity and frequency with which program activities were conducted and resources used. Mean annual economic costs at health facilities in each country ranged from $1,207 to $3,190, while at the national level these ranged from $7,657 to $304,278. Mean annual HPV vaccine doses delivered per health facility in each country ranged from 162 to 761. Mean financial costs per dose per study country ranged from $0.27 to $3.32, while the economic cost per dose ranged from $3.09 to $17.20. CONCLUSION: HPV vaccine delivery costs were lower than at introduction in some study countries. There were differences in the activities carried out for HPV vaccine delivery and the number of doses delivered, impacting the cost estimates.

Cost of human papillomavirus vaccine delivery in a single-age cohort, routine-based vaccination program in Senegal.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, Senegal introduced human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine into its routine immunization program for all nine-year-old girls nationwide. We evaluated the costs of Senegal's introduction of HPV vaccine via this delivery approach. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, incremental, ingredients-based cost evaluation from the provider perspective. The study timeframe included Senegal's first planning meeting in 2018 through data collection in early 2020. We collected costs from all involved units at the national and regional levels. A multi-stage cluster sampling approach was used to obtain a nationally representative sample of districts and health facilities. Weights were applied to costs from sampled units to estimate costs across all units. The cost evaluation was based on four dimensions: program activity, resource input, payer, and administrative level. Total costs were divided by the number of HPV doses administered to determine cost per dose and per dimension. RESULTS: Excluding vaccine program activity costs, the total financial and economic delivery costs of Senegal's HPV vaccination program were US$ 1,152,351 and US$ 2,838,466, respectively (US$ 3.07 and US$ 7.56 per dose, respectively). A total of 375,608 HPV vaccine doses were administered during the cost evaluation. Training and per diem represented the largest shares of financial costs. Service delivery and personnel time accounted for the largest shares of economic costs. By administrative level, district and health facility levels had the largest shares of financial and economic costs, respectively. Senegal's Ministry of Health accounted for the largest share of financial and economic costs. Including vaccine program activity costs (US$ 4.68/per dose), the total financial cost was US$ 2,911,343 (US$ 7.75 per dose). CONCLUSION: This cost evaluation can support Senegal's future vaccine introductions and inform other countries planning to introduce HPV vaccine nationwide. These findings support previous costing studies which anticipated potential economies of scale during the transition from HPV vaccine pilot demonstration projects to national introduction.

Feasibility and acceptability of nationwide HPV vaccine introduction in Senegal: Findings from community-level cross-sectional surveys, 2020.

In Senegal, cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women and the leading cause of morbidity and mortality from all cancers. In 2018, Senegal launched a national human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program with Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (Gavi), support. HPV vaccination was incorporated into the national immunization program as a two-dose schedule, with a 6-12-month interval, to nine-year-old girls via routine immunization (RI) services at health facilities, schools and community outreach services throughout the year. During February to March 2020, we conducted interviews to assess the awareness, feasibility, and acceptability of the HPV vaccination program with a cross-sectional convenience sample of healthcare workers (HCWs), school personnel, community healthcare workers (cHCWs), parents, and community leaders from 77 rural and urban health facility catchment areas. Participants were asked questions on HPV vaccine knowledge, delivery, training, and community acceptability of the program. We conducted a descriptive analysis stratified by respondent type. Data were collected from 465 individuals: 77 HCW, 78 school personnel, 78 cHCWs, 152 parents, and community leaders. The majority of HCWs (83.1%) and cHCWs (74.4%) and school personnel (57.7%) attended a training on HPV vaccine before program launch. Of all respondents, most (52.5-87.2%) were able to correctly identify the target population. The majority of respondents (60.2-77.5%) felt that the vaccine was very accepted or accepted in the community. Senegal's HPV vaccine introduction program, among the first national programs in the African region, was accepted by community stakeholders. Training rates were high, and most respondents identified the target population correctly. However, continued technical support is needed for the integration of HPV vaccination as a RI activity for this non-traditional age group. The Senegal experience can be a useful resource for countries planning to introduce the HPV vaccine.

National introduction of HPV vaccination in Senegal-Successes, challenges, and lessons learned.

Following successful school-based demonstration programs in 2014-2016, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was introduced nationwide in Senegal for 9-year-old girls in 2018, using a routine service delivery strategy at health facilities, schools, and other outreach sites. We reviewed the HPV vaccine introduction in Senegal to understand the successes, challenges, and lessons learned. Focusing on three key domains (program decision-making, planning, and implementation), we conducted ten semi-structured interviews during 2019-2020 with purposively selected national-level stakeholders (government, expert advisory committee, key technical and implementation partners) and comprehensive desk reviews of country documents on HPV vaccine introduction. Due to the global HPV vaccine shortage, the introduction was limited to a single-age cohort; therefore, 9-year-old girls were chosen. This strategy enabled Senegal to potentially reach more girls in primary education because school enrolment rates decline thereafter. Vaccination through routine delivery platforms (i.e., health facility, school-based, and community outreach) was perceived to be more cost-effective than a campaign approach. High-level political commitment and collaborations between immunization and education partners were frequently cited by key informants as reasons for a successful vaccine introduction. All key informants reported that the health care worker (HCW) strike, rumors, and vaccine hesitancy negatively impacted the introduction. Other challenges noted included insufficient information on attitudes towards HPV vaccination among HCWs, teachers, and community members. Senegal successfully introduced HPV vaccine into the national immunization schedule, using a routine delivery strategy. Strong leadership and a multi-sectoral approach likely contributed to this success. To build sustainability of the HPV vaccination program in the future, it is important to improve the understanding and engagement among all stakeholders, including HCWs and community members, and to strengthen and innovate communication and crisis management strategies. To better understand the efficiency and effectiveness of Senegal's vaccination strategy, additional assessments of the operational costs and coverage achieved are needed.

Progress in HPV vaccination in low- and lower-middle-income countries.

The past 10 years have seen remarkable progress in the global scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations. Forty-three low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs) have gained experience in delivering this vaccine to young adolescent girls through pilot programs, demonstration programs, and national introductions and most of these have occurred in the last 4 years. The experience of Senegal is summarized as an illustrative country case study. Publication of numerous delivery experiences and lessons learned has demonstrated the acceptability and feasibility of HPV vaccinations in LLMICs. Four areas require dedicated action to overcome remaining challenges to national scaling-up: maintaining momentum politically, planning successfully, securing financing, and fostering sustainability. Advances in policy, programming, and science may help accelerate reaching 30 million girls in LLMICs with HPV vaccine by 2020.

Determinants of complete immunization among senegalese children aged 12-23 months: evidence from the demographic and health survey.

BACKGROUND: The expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) is one of the most cost-effective interventions to reduce childhood mortality and morbidity. However, determinants of childhood immunization have not been well studied in Senegal. Thus, the aim of our study is to assess routine immunization uptake and factors associated with full immunization status among Senegalese children aged 12-23 months. METHODS: We used the 2010-2011 Senegalese Demographic and Health Survey data. The DHS was a two stages cross-sectional survey carried out in 2010-2011. The analysis included 2199 children aged 12-23 months. The interviewers collected information on vaccine uptake based on information from vaccination cards or maternal recall Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions models were used to identify the determinants of full childhood immunization. RESULTS: The prevalence of complete immunization coverage among boys and girls based on both vaccination card information and mothers' recall was 62.8%. The immunization coverage as documented on vaccination cards was 37.5%. Specific coverage for the single dose of BCG at birth, the third dose of polio vaccine, the third dose of pentavalent vaccine and the first dose of measles vaccine were 94.7%, 72.7%, 82.6%, and 82.1%, respectively. We found that mothers who could show a vaccination card [AOR 7.27 95% CI (5.50-9.60)], attended at least secondary education level [AOR 1.8 95% CI (1.20-2.48)], attended four antenatal visits [AOR 3.10 95% CI (1.69-5.63)], or delivered at a health facility [AOR 1.27 95% CI (1-1.74)] were the predictors of full childhood immunization. Additionally, children living in the eastern administrative regions of the country were less likely to be fully vaccinated [AOR 0.62 95% CI (0.39-0.97)]. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the full immunization coverage among children aged between 12 and 23 months was below the national (> 80%) and international targets (90%). Geographic area, mother's characteristics, antenatal care and access to health care services were associated with full immunization. These findings highlight the need for innovative strategies based on a holistic approach to overcome the barriers to childhood immunization in Senegal.

Understanding the policy environment for immunization supply chains: Lessons learned from landscape analyses in Uganda and Senegal.

As immunization programs around the world undergo rapid change and expansion, supply chain and logistics systems have become strained, making it increasingly challenging for national public health systems to provide reliable, safe, and efficient access to vaccines. Governments and immunization partners have been aware of this problem for several years, and in 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Effective Vaccine Management (EVM) process to help countries identify shortcomings in their immunization supply chains and develop plans for systematic improvement. EVM improvement plans now exist in all Gavi-eligible countries plus many middle- and upper-income countries; however, implementation has been slow and in many cases fraught with financial, managerial, structural, and political roadblocks. Recognizing that significant change of any kind requires a supportive policy environment and strong leadership, PATH began working in Uganda and Senegal to landscape the policy environment around immunization and identify relevant policies, administrative and technical roles and responsibilities, and other issues that may be affecting the supply chain for immunization. The policy landscape assessments included a desk review and a series of structured, in-depth interviews with key international, national, and local stakeholders. The findings highlighted a number of critical issues and challenges in both countries that may be preventing supply chains from functioning optimally. These challenges include a need for better coordination and planning between immunization programs and supply chain managers; the need for sufficient, timely and reliable financing for all aspects of immunization programs; the need for high-level managers trained in immunization supply chain management; and an urgent need for better, more timely data for decision-making. Overcoming these challenges will require the involvement of high-level political actors-including ministers of health and finance, parliamentarians, and other officials who have the ability to approve and influence policy, personnel, and structural changes; ensure work plans are backed with adequate resources for implementation; and hold program managers accountable for achieving agreed indicators.

Application of the World Health Organization Programmatic Assessment Tool for Risk of Measles Virus Transmission-Lessons Learned from a Measles Outbreak in Senegal.

The World Health Organization (WHO) African Region set a goal for regional measles elimination by 2020; however, regional measles incidence was 125/1,000,000 in 2012. To support elimination efforts, the WHO and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed a tool to assess performance of measles control activities and identify high-risk areas at the subnational level. The tool uses routinely collected data to generate district-level risk scores across four categories: population immunity, surveillance quality, program performance, and threat assessment. To pilot test this tool, we used retrospective data from 2006 to 2008 to identify high-risk districts in Senegal; results were compared with measles case-based surveillance data from 2009 when Senegal experienced a large measles outbreak. Seventeen (25%) of 69 districts in Senegal were classified as high or very high risk. The tool highlighted how each of the four categories contributed to the total risk scores for high or very high risk districts. Measles case-based surveillance reported 986 cases during 2009, including 368 laboratory-confirmed, 540 epidemiologically linked, and 78 clinically compatible cases. The seven districts with the highest numbers of laboratory-confirmed or epidemiologically linked cases were within the capital region of Dakar. All except one of these seven districts were estimated to be high or very high risk, suggesting that districts identified as high risk by the tool have the potential for measles outbreaks. Prospective use of this tool is recommended to help immunization and surveillance program managers identify high-risk areas in which to strengthen specific programmatic weaknesses and mitigate risk for potential measles outbreaks.

[Economic evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests in malaria treatment]. / Evaluation économique des tests de diagnostic rapide dans le traitement du paludisme.

This study aimed to evaluate the economic implications of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) on malaria management through the rational use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). The study was carried out in 2006 from November 10th to December 10th; it focused on patients who were seen and treated with ACT for suspicion of uncomplicated malaria in the health district of Ziguinchor, Senegal. The variables studied included age, sex, RDT results, and costs of care and RDT. The cost of care for malaria, estimated in CFA Francs, was evaluated both with and without the use of RDT. Among the 379 patients, 25,1% were aged 0-4 years, 12,7% of 5-14 years and 62,2% of at least 15 years; 51% were women. The result of the RDT was negative in 60% of cases. Without the use of diagnostic testing, the cost of care for all 379 cases was estimated at 299 957 CFA: patient contributions would cover 184 500 CFA and the State would cover the rest (115 457 CFA). With the use of RDTs, the overall cost of the RDT screening for 379 patients and the cost of treatment for the 150 positive cases amounted to 254 786 CFA, with patients bearing the cost of 205 550 CFA and the State subsidizing up to 49 236 CFA. RDT can help identify the positive cases of malaria, and avoid up to 60% of unnecessary treatments, corresponding to an estimated 27 297 cases at the district level and 584 630 cases nationally. The RDT also allow a more rational use of ACTs and a lower risk of emergence of Plasmodium resistance. The use of RDTs could result in savings of 45 171 CFA at the level of the district health centre and 111 240 136 CFA nationally.