PERIACETABULAR BONE CHANGES AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY WITH HIGHLY POROUS TITANIUM CUPS IN PATIENTS WITH LOW BONE MASS.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To assess the bone remodeling around highly porous titanium cups TTM in patients with low bone mass one year after total hip arthroplasty (THA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: In this prospective study were included 18 patients (18 hips), whom was performed primary THA with the use of TTM cups. According to T-score of Lumbar Spine, patients were divided into 2 groups: normal bone mineral density (BMD) (n=9) if T-score ≥ -1, and low BMD (n=9) if T-score < -1. According to DeLee and Charnley's model BMD in 3 periacetabular regions were evaluated 1 week and 1 year after THA. RESULTS: Results: One year after primary THA, BMD of all 3 periacetabular regions did not differ in patients of both groups comparing with initial data. One week after THA, it was found that BMD R1 and BMD R3 in low BMD group were lower by 1.4 times (p=0.035) and 1.5 times (р=0.001) respectively, BMD R2 did not differ from the normal BMD group. One year after THA it was found that in low BMD group BMD R1 and BMD R2 were lower by 1.5 times (р=0.005) and 1.3 times (р=0.050) respectively, BMD R3 did not differ from the group with normal BMD. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The use of highly porous titanium cups TTM in patients with low bone mass did not lead to a bone loss in DeLee and Charnley periacetabular zones one year after THA. Consequently, the use of these cups in patients with low bone mass undergoing THA is a valuable treatment option.

Osseointegration of porous titanium and tantalum implants in ovariectomized rabbits: A biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Today, biological fixation of uncemented press-fit acetabular components plays an important role in total hip arthroplasty. Long-term stable fixation of these implants depends on the osseointegration of the acetabular cup bone tissue into the acetabular cup implant, and their ability to withstand functional loads. AIM: To compare the strength of bone-implant osseointegration of four types of porous metal implants in normal and osteoporotic bone in rabbits. METHODS: The study was performed in 50 female California rabbits divided into non-ovariectomized (non-OVX) and ovariectomized groups (OVX) at 6 mo of age. Rabbits were sacrificed 8 wk after the implantation of four biomaterials [TTM, CONCELOC, Zimmer Biomet's Trabecular Metal (TANTALUM), and ATLANT] in a 5-mm diameter defect created in the left femur. A biomechanical evaluation of the femur was carried out by testing implant breakout force. The force was gradually increased until complete detachment of the implant from the bone occurred. RESULTS: The breakout force needed for implant detachment was significantly higher in the non-OVX group, compared with the OVX group for all implants (TANTALUM, 194.7 ± 6.1 N vs 181.3 ± 2.8 N; P = 0.005; CONCELOC, 190.8 ± 3.6 N vs 180.9 ± 6.6 N; P = 0.019; TTM, 186.3 ± 1.8 N vs 172.0 N ± 11.0 N; P = 0.043; and ATLANT, 104.9 ± 7.0 N vs 78.9 N ± 4.5 N; P = 0.001). In the OVX group, The breakout forces in TANTALUM, TTM, and CONCELOC did not differ significantly (P = 0.066). The breakout force for ATLANT in the OVX group was lower by a factor of 2.3 compared with TANTALUM and CONCELOC, and by 2.2 compared with TTM (P = 0.001). In the non-OVX group, the breakout force for ATLANT was significantly different from all other implants, with a reduction in fixation strength by a factor of 1.9 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: TANTALUM, TTM, and CONCELOC had equal bone-implant osseointegration in healthy and in osteoporotic bone. ATLANT had significantly decreased osseointegration (P = 0.001) in healthy and in osteoporotic bone.

Evaluation of the bone morphology around four types of porous metal implants placed in distal femur of ovariectomized rats.

BACKGROUND: To compare structural features of the femoral bone of ovariectomized and non-ovariectomized rats after implantation of porous materials (TANTALUM, CONCELOC, TTM, ATLANT). METHODS: Experiments were carried out on 56 white laboratory female rats aged 6 months. Rats were randomly assigned into groups: sham-operated control group (SH) or ovariectomy group (OVX). Four different commercial implant materials (TTM, CONCELOC, TANTALUM, ATLANT) were placed into the defects (diameter 2.5 mm, depth 3.0 mm) in the distal metaphysis of femurs. Rats were sacrificed 45 days after surgery. Histological study was performed and the percentage of the bone area (BA%) around the implant at a distance of 500 µm in the cancellous area was measured. RESULTS: Formation of mature bone tissue of varying degrees around all of the implants was detected. In OVX rats cancellous bone defect zone was characterized by a high density of osteocytes on the surface. In the SH group, no differences in BA% among implant materials were found. In OVX rats, the BA% around ATLANT implants was 1.5-time less (p = 0.002) than around TANTALUM. The BA% around the rest of the materials was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Bone formation around the studied porous titanium and tantalum materials in the osteoporosis model was lower than in normal bone. There were differences in bone formation around the different materials in the osteoporosis model, while in the normal bone model, these differences were absent.

Comparative analysis of osseointegration in various types of acetabular implant materials.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of comparative data on osseointegration (BIC) of acetabular cup surfaces in hip arthroplasty in both normal bone mineral density and in conditions of osteoporosis. AIM: To compare osseointegration of acetabular implants with various types of surfaces in an animal model with normal and osteoporotic bone tissue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed on 60 rats. To simulate osteoporosis ovariectomy was performed in 30 animals. Thirty healthy rats served as controls. In standardised defects of the distal metadiaphysis of the femur we implanted: porous tantalum Trabecular Metal (A), Trabecular Titanium (B), Titanium with Gription coating (C), Stiktite (D), and Tritanum (E). Bone apposition (osseointegration) was defined as all areas of direct "bone-to-implant contact" (BIC). RESULTS: No qualitative morphological differences in the evaluation of BIC around different implant types was seen in normal rats and rats with osteoporosis. Connective tissue areas around implants were larger in rats with osteoporosis. Morphometric studies showed that the highest BIC were seen in implants A and B, both in healthy animals ([72.00 ± 3.48]% and [67.46 ± 1.69]%) and ones with osteoporosis ([59.19 ± 2.10]% and [53.36 ± 2.57]%). BIC was (60.10 ± 2.05)%, (60.26 ± 2.36)%, and (61.78 ± 2.27)% around implants C, D and E in healthy rats, respectively. BIC in osteoporosis was (45.39 ± 2.37)%, (47.81 ± 2.41)% and (42.10 ± 1.44)%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the evaluated implants have good BIC features. Furthermore, based on histomorthometry and histology, Porous tantalum Trabecular Metal (A) and Trabecular Titanium (B) implants exhibit higher BIC with bone tissue.