The preclinical and phase 1 development of the novel oral cathepsin C inhibitor BI 1291583.

Preclinical and phase 1 study results indicate that BI 1291583 is a reversible, highly potent and highly selective CatC inhibitor that markedly inhibits active NSP production in a dose-dependent manner, supporting phase 2 trials in bronchiectasis patients https://bit.ly/47PZ8E5.

The effect of bradykinin 1 receptor antagonist BI 1026706 on pulmonary inflammation after segmental lipopolysaccharide challenge in healthy smokers.

BACKGROUND: Bradykinin 1 receptor (B1R) signalling pathways may be involved in the inflammatory pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). B1R signalling is induced by inflammatory stimuli or tissue injury and leads to activation and increased migration of pro-inflammatory cells. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) lung challenge in man is an experimental method of exploring inflammation in the lung whereby interference in these pathways can help to assess pharmacologic interventions in COPD. BI 1026706, a potent B1R antagonist, was hypothesized to reduce the inflammatory activity after segmental lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in humans due to decreased pulmonary cell influx. METHODS: In a monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase I trial, 57 healthy, smoking subjects were treated for 28 days with either oral BI 1026706 100 mg bid or placebo. At day 21, turbo-inversion recovery magnitude magnetic resonance imaging (TIRM MRI) was performed. On the last day of treatment, pre-challenge bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and biopsies were sampled, followed by segmental LPS challenge (40 endotoxin units/kg body weight) and saline control instillation in different lung lobes. Twenty-four hours later, TIRM MRI was performed, then BAL and biopsies were collected from the challenged segments. In BAL samples, cells were differentiated for neutrophil numbers as the primary endpoint. Other endpoints included assessment of safety, biomarkers in BAL (e.g. interleukin-8 [IL-8], albumin and total protein), B1R expression in lung biopsies and TIRM score by MRI as a measure for the extent of pulmonary oedema. RESULTS: After LPS, but not after saline, high numbers of inflammatory cells, predominantly neutrophils were observed in the airways. IL-8, albumin and total protein were also increased in BAL samples after LPS challenge as compared with saline control. There were no significant differences in cells or other biomarkers from BAL in volunteers treated with BI 1026706 compared with those treated with placebo. Unexpectedly, neutrophil numbers in BAL were 30% higher and MRI-derived extent of oedema was significantly higher with BI 1026706 treatment compared with placebo, 24 h after LPS challenge. Adverse events were mainly mild to moderate and not different between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with BI 1026706 for four weeks was safe and well-tolerated in healthy smoking subjects. BI 1026706 100 mg bid did not provide evidence for anti-inflammatory effects in the human bronchial LPS challenge model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on January 14, 2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02657408).

Sodium Chloride versus Lactose as a Carrier for House Dust Mite Allergen in Allergen Chamber Studies: A Clinical Study to Assess Noninferiority.

INTRODUCTION: In the Fraunhofer allergen challenge chamber (ACC), a standardized, universal, good manufacturing practice-conforming technology using a spray dried solution of lactose (L) and allergen extract has been established. In this study, we investigated the noninferiority of hypertonic sodium chloride (S) versus L as a carrier for house dust mite (HDM) allergen to simplify manufacturing, reduce costs, and allow for wider use. METHODS: Using a participant-blinded, sham exposure-controlled, single-arm, sequential intervention study, we challenged adults with HDM allergic rhinitis five times in the ACC. Participants were first exposed to S, L, and clean air (block 1), followed by S + HDM and L + HDM (block 2). Primary endpoints were mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and mean nasal secretion weight. RESULTS: 19 participants were enrolled in the study (10 females; mean age 32 years [22-49], 4 with mild allergic asthma). The safety profile of S + HDM and L + HDM was similar; eight participants experienced mild procedure-related adverse events including tiredness, cough, and dyspnea. Due to dropouts, 13 participants completed the study and were evaluated. Mean TNSS and nasal secretion were as follows: S 0.98, 0.28 g; L 1.1, 0.20 g; clean air 1.1, 0.23 g; S + HDM 5.7, 4.8 g; L + HDM 5.1, 5.1 g. Separate block 1/block 2 MANOVAs with TNSS and nasal secretion as dependent variables revealed no significant differences between the carriers, neither alone and compared with clean air (p = 0.2059, Wilk's λ = 0.78) nor combined with HDM (p = 0.3474, Wilk's λ = 0.89). Noninferiority of S was established using a meta-analysis-based minimal clinical important difference of -0.55: mean TNSS difference between S + HDM and L + HDM was 0.62 (90% CI: -0.51 to 1.74). CONCLUSION: S as an HDM carrier was safe and well tolerated. It was noninferior to L which makes it an adequate and easy-to-use carrier substitute.

Pharmacokinetics of Nasal Esketamine in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis with and Without Nasal Decongestant Pretreatment and in Healthy Subjects with and Without Nasal Corticosteroid Pretreatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nasal esketamine is indicated for the treatment of adults with treatment-resistant depression and depressive symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior. Primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of nasal decongestant pretreatment in patients with allergic rhinitis and the impact of daily nasal corticosteroid administration by healthy subjects on nasal esketamine pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Patients with allergic rhinitis self-administered 56 mg of nasal esketamine after pretreatment with nasal oxymetazoline (0.05%) at 1 h before esketamine and without oxymetazoline pretreatment. They were exposed to grass pollen in an allergen challenge chamber to induce allergic rhinitis symptoms at approximately 2 h before each esketamine administration until 1 h after. Healthy subjects self-administered esketamine (56 mg) before and after administration for 16 consecutive days of mometasone (200 µg), with the second esketamine dose administered 1 h after the last mometasone dose. The plasma pharmacokinetics of esketamine and noresketamine were assessed after each esketamine administration. The tolerability of esketamine, including effects on dissociative and potential psychotomimetic symptoms and level of sedation and suicidal ideation and behavior, was evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of esketamine absorption was slightly greater in patients exhibiting symptoms of allergic rhinitis (decrease in median tmax from 32 min to 22 min). Increases in esketamine Cmax and AUC were also small (mean, ≤ 21%). The pharmacokinetics of esketamine was not affected by oxymetazoline or mometasone pretreatment. Esketamine was well tolerated when it was administered with or without pretreatment of oxymetazoline or mometasone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients exhibiting symptoms of rhinitis may receive nasal esketamine spray without dose adjustment. In addition, esketamine may be administered 1 h after using a nasal decongestant or corticosteroid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials (NCT02154334) and EudraCT (2014-000534-38) registries.

Occupational exposure to veterinary antibiotics: Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin in humans after dermal, inhalation and oral uptake - A clinical study.

Occupational exposure to veterinary antibiotics in hen houses at poultry feeding farms was demonstrated by biomonitoring campaigns in the past. The objective of this study was to investigate pharmacokinetics of three uptake routes: dermal, oral and inhaled. In an open-label cross-over study, six healthy volunteers were exposed to single occupational relevant doses of enrofloxacin. Plasma and urine samples were analysed for enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling based on bioanalysis data showed underestimation for the elimination rate in comparison to experimental data pointing towards a lack of sufficient ADME information and limitations of available physico-chemical properties of the parent drug. The data obtained in this study indicate that oral uptake with its various sources, e.g. airborne enrofloxacin, direct hand-mouth contact, is the major source for occupational exposure to enrofloxacin in hen houses. Dermal exposure was considered negligible.

Efficacy and Safety of a Drug-Free, Barrier-Forming Nasal Spray for Allergic Rhinitis: Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Noninferiority Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Symptoms of allergic rhinitis can be reduced by nonpharmacological nasal sprays that create a barrier between allergens and the nasal mucosa. A new nasal spray (AM-301) containing the clay mineral bentonite was tested for its ability to reduce symptoms of grass pollen. METHODS: This open-label, crossover, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of AM-301 to that of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC; Nasaleze® Allergy Blocker), an established barrier method. Adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis were exposed to Dactylis glomerata pollen, in a controlled setting, the Fraunhofer allergen challenge chamber, first without protection and then protected by HPMC or AM-301 (7 days apart). Efficacy was assessed from total nasal symptom score (TNSS), nasal secretion weight, and subjective rating. The primary endpoint was the difference, between AM-301 and HPMC, in least square mean change in TNSS over a 4-h exposure to allergen. RESULTS: The study enrolled 36 persons, and 35 completed all study visits. The mean TNSS was 5.91 (SD = 1.45) during unprotected exposure, 5.20 (SD = 1.70) during protection with HPMC, and 4.82 (SD = 1.74) during protection with AM-301. The difference in least square means between the two treatments was -0.39 (95% CI: -0.89 to 0.10), establishing the noninferiority of AM-301. No difference in mean weight of nasal secretions was observed between the treatments. Efficacy was rated as good or very good for AM-301 by 31% and for HPMC by 14% of subjects. Sixteen subjects reported adverse events with a relationship to AM-301 or HPMC; most adverse events were mild, and none was serious. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: AM-301 demonstrated noninferiority toward HPMC in the primary endpoint and was perceived better in subjective secondary endpoints. Both barrier-forming products had a persisting protective effect over 4 h and were safe.

Lung pharmacokinetics of inhaled and systemic drugs: A clinical evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Human pharmacokinetic studies of lung-targeted drugs are typically limited to measurements of systemic plasma concentrations, which provide no direct information on lung target-site concentrations. We aimed to evaluate lung pharmacokinetics of commonly prescribed drugs by sampling different lung compartments after inhalation and oral administration. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Healthy volunteers received single, sequential doses of either inhaled salbutamol, salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (n = 12), or oral salbutamol and propranolol (n = 6). Each participant underwent bronchoscopies and gave breath samples for analysis of particles in exhaled air at two points after drug administration (1 and 6, 2 and 9, 3 and 12, or 4 and 18 h). Lung samples were taken via bronchosorption, bronchial brush, mucosal biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage during each bronchoscopy. Blood samples were taken during the 24 h after administration. Pharmacokinetic profiles were generated by combining data from multiple individuals, covering all sample timings. KEY RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained for each drug in lung epithelial lining fluid, lung tissue and plasma. Inhalation of salbutamol resulted in approximately 100-fold higher concentrations in lung than in plasma. Salmeterol and fluticasone concentration ratios in lung versus plasma were higher still. Bronchosorption- and bronchoalveolar-lavage-generated profiles of inhaled drugs in epithelial lining fluid were comparable. For orally administered drugs, epithelial-lining-fluid concentrations were overestimated in bronchoalveolar-lavage-generated profiles. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Combining pharmacokinetic data derived from several individuals and techniques sampling different lung compartments enabled generation of pharmacokinetic profiles for evaluation of lung targeting after inhaled and oral drug delivery.

Effects of Recombinant Human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 on Response to Acute Hypoxia and Exercise: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a key enzyme of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Enhancing ACE2 activity using GSK2586881, a recombinant form of human ACE2, could be beneficial in diseases such as ARDS but may blunt the hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) response and potentially impact systemic and tissue oxygenation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of GSK2586881 0.8 mg/kg on HPV response in healthy adult volunteers during exercise under hypoxic conditions. METHODS: In this phase I, randomised, double-blind (sponsor open) study, GSK2586881 or placebo was administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose in a two-period crossover design. Treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 3-14 days. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) measured by echocardiography. Secondary endpoints included RAS peptides and oxygen saturation. RESULTS: Seventeen adults aged 18-40 years were randomised to treatment. There were no clinically relevant differences (defined as a reduction of ≥ 5 mmHg) in change from baseline in PASP between GSK2586881 and placebo. GSK2586881 was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events, no worsening of hypoxaemia and no evidence of immunogenicity. The study was terminated early after review of the data, which showed that the predefined success criteria had not been met. Following GSK2586881 administration, levels of the RAS peptide angiotensin II decreased while angiotensin (1-7) increased, as expected, indicating that GSK2586881 was pharmacologically active. CONCLUSIONS: A single IV dose of GSK2586881 0.8 mg/kg was well tolerated but did not impact the acute HPV response in healthy volunteers.

Investigating the effect of TRPV4 inhibition on pulmonary-vascular barrier permeability following segmental endotoxin challenge.

BACKGROUND: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is associated with increased pulmonary-vascular permeability. In the lung, transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4), a Ca2+-permeable cation channel, is a regulator of endothelial permeability and pulmonary edema. We performed a Phase I, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, proof-of-mechanism study to investigate the effects of TRPV4 channel blocker, GSK2798745, on pulmonary-vascular barrier permeability using a model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung inflammation. METHODS: Healthy participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 single doses of GSK2798745 or placebo, 12 h apart. Two hours after the first dose, participants underwent bronchoscopy and segmental LPS instillation. Total protein concentration and neutrophil counts were measured in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples collected before and 24 h after LPS challenge, as markers of barrier permeability and inflammation, respectively. The primary endpoint was baseline adjusted total protein concentration in BAL at 24 h after LPS challenge. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate the posterior probability of any percentage reduction (GSK2798745 relative to placebo). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, clinical laboratory and haematological evaluations, and spirometry. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were dosed and 45 completed the study (22 on GSK2798745 and 23 on placebo). Overall, GSK2798745 was well tolerated. Small reductions in mean baseline adjusted BAL total protein (~9%) and neutrophils (~7%) in the LPS-challenged segment were observed in the GSK2798745 group compared with the placebo group; however, the reductions did not meet pre-specified success criteria of at least a 95% posterior probability that the percentage reduction in the mean 24-h post LPS BAL total protein level (GSK2798745 relative to placebo) exceeded zero. Median plasma concentrations of GSK2798745 were predicted to inhibit TRPV4 on lung vascular endothelial cells by ~70-85% during the 24 h after LPS challenge; median urea-corrected BAL concentrations of GSK2798745 were 3.0- to 8.7-fold higher than those in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: GSK2798745 did not affect segmental LPS-induced elevation of BAL total protein or neutrophils, despite blood and lung exposures that were predicted to be efficacious. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03511105.

The first-in-human study of CNTO 7160, an anti-interleukin-33 receptor monoclonal antibody, in healthy subjects and patients with asthma or atopic dermatitis.

AIMS: To assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and immunogenicity of CNTO 7160, an anti-interleukin-33 receptor (IL-33R) monoclonal antibody, in healthy subjects and patients with asthma or atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: In Part 1 of this Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, healthy subjects (n = 68) received single ascending intravenous (IV) CNTO 7160 dose (0.001 to 10 mg/kg) or placebo. In Part 2, patients with mild asthma (n = 24) or mild AD (n = 15) received 3 biweekly IV CNTO 7160 doses (3 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo. RESULTS: CNTO 7160 was generally well tolerated, with 1 serious adverse event of severe cellulitis reported (AD, CNTO 7160, 3 mg/kg). CNTO 7160 exhibited nonlinear PK (0.01-10 mg/kg). Mean clearance decreased with increasing dose (2.43 to 18.03 mL/d/kg). CNTO 7160 PK was similar between healthy subjects and patients with asthma or AD (3 or 10 mg/kg). Free sIL-33R suppression was rapid and dose dependent. Ex vivo inhibition of p38 phosphorylation of basophils was dose-dependent (1-10 mg/kg) and sustained inhibition (≥75%) was observed at higher doses (3 or 10 mg/kg). PK/PD modelling and simulation suggests that 1 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks provides adequate systemic drug exposure for sustained inhibition of p38 phosphorylation of basophils. Despite confirmation of target engagement, no apparent CNTO 7160 clinical activity was observed in patients (asthma or AD). CONCLUSION: This first-in-human study provides PK, PD and safety data, supporting further clinical investigation of CNTO 7160 in patients with asthma and AD.

The Effect of a Thixotropic Nasal Gel on Nasal Symptoms and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-free viscous nasal applications have been shown to reduce nasal symptoms in individuals with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Nascum®-Plus (NP), a commercially available thixotropic gel, has been designed to reduce dryness and soreness of the nasal mucosa and prevent the absorption of small particles. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of single-dose NP in treating nasal symptoms and secretion during challenge in an allergen challenge chamber (ACC). Furthermore, the effect of this treatment on biomarkers and immune cells of the allergic cascade were measured. METHODS: This open-label, cross-over, sequence-randomized, monocentric trial randomized 18 adults with SAR and a positive skin prick test reaction to Dactylis glomerata pollen to receive NP or no treatment during two 4-h ACC sessions 3 weeks apart. On Day 1, 9 subjects were challenged for 4 h with treatment, the other 9 without treatment, and vice versa on Day 22. Nasal lavage fluid and nasal filter eluate samples were obtained pre, 2, and 18 h post challenge in the ACC. RESULTS: NP significantly reduced nasal symptoms, assessed by total nasal symptom score (p < 0.001), and minimized nasal secretion (p = 0.047), while no significant effect on biomarkers and immune cells in the nasal fluid was observed. The treatment was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The physical barrier built by NP nasal gel can be safely applied in patients with allergic rhinitis. It reduces allergic nasal symptoms and secretion, but application of a single dose does not affect local inflammatory biomarkers.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel anti-asthmatic drug, XC8, in healthy probands.

INTRODUCTION: XC8 (histamine glutarimide) is a novel agent which targets eosinophilic migration and mast cell degranulation and has shown anti-asthmatic effects in animal studies. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this placebo-controlled phase 1 study was to assess the safety of oral XC8 and to evaluate its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. METHODS: 32 healthy volunteers in three dose-escalation treatment groups (10 mg [n = 8], 50 mg [n = 8] and 200 mg [n = 16]) were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to XC8 or placebo respectively. The subjects received a single dose of the drug at Day 1 and then once-daily for 14 days (Days 8-21). RESULTS: No severe adverse events occurred. The number of adverse events was similar in the treatment arms compared to placebo and all subjects completed the study as planned. No clinically significant changes occurred in hematologic and biochemical blood tests in subjects receiving XC8. The pharmacokinetic data showed similar dose and time dependent mean plasma XC8 concentrations after single (Day 1) and multiple (Day 21) dosing. The mean maximum concentrations were 114-1993 ng/mL after single and 115-2089 ng/mL after multiple dosing. The mean times to maximum concentration were 0.68-1.01 and 0.67-0.98 h, respectively. There was no evidence for accumulation of XC8 after multiple dosing. CONCLUSION: XC8 was safe and well tolerated. A phase 2 study is being performed to further evaluate the potential role of XC8 in asthma treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02882217.

Phase 1 pharmacokinetics and phase 3 efficacy of testosterone nasal gel in subjects with seasonal allergies.

INTRODUCTION: NATESTO® testosterone nasal gel (TNG) is a liquid gel that is applied in the nose for the treatment of male hypogonadism. There is a reasonable concern that administration of TNG to patients with active rhinitis could modify absorption. Results from two clinical studies are reported wherein subjects with allergic rhinitis (AR) subjects are treated with TNG. METHODS: The 24-hour pharmacokinetics (PK) and relative bioavailability of serum total testosterone (sTT) from TNG (11 mg tid ) were determined using a phase 1 Latin-square design with 18 eugonadal AR subjects crossed over between asymptomatic, symptomatic-untreated, and symptomatic-treated (oxymetazoline) conditions. Allergy symptoms, assessed using Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), were induced using grass pollen in an allergy challenge chamber (ACC) prior to administration of TNG. The data are discussed in relation to results from a phase 3 study in 306 hypogonadal patients which compare clinical outcomes of AR and non-AR patients treated with TNG. RESULTS: PK analysis (Tmax, maximum observed concentration [Cmax], area under the curve [AUC]) of sTT showed no difference in the rate or extent of absorption of exogenous testosterone from TNG as a function of allergy symptoms. The relative bioavailability also showed all three conditions to be equivalent. However, pre-dose mean sTT in AR patients was 21-25% lower when symptomatic vs. asymptomatic, which is attributed to the allergic reaction. A large phase 3 study, based predominantly on PK measures of sTT, showed that clinical outcomes for AR and non-AR patients treated with TNG were identical, including the percentage of patients in the eugonadal range, hormone profiles, and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: AR does not affect absorption of TNG. Patient outcomes for long-term treatment with TNG for up to one year are not dependent on AR history.

Specificity and reproducibility of nasal biomarkers in patients with allergic rhinitis after allergen challenge chamber exposure.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disease that causes cellular influx and mediator release in the nose. These inflammatory changes might be used as nasal biomarkers to assess the efficacy of novel anti-allergic treatments. OBJECTIVE: To assess the specificity and reproducibility of nasal biomarkers in patients with allergic rhinitis after grass pollen exposure in an allergen challenge chamber. METHODS: In a monocenter pilot study, 15 patients with allergic rhinitis and 19 healthy individuals underwent two 4-hour Dactylis glomerate pollen challenges in the challenge chamber with an interval of 21 days. Before challenge, on exit, and after 2 and 22 hours, a nasal lavage was performed and nasal secretions were collected on filter paper to determine a wide panel of cells and mediators. Furthermore, total nasal symptom score, nasal flow, and nasal nitric oxide were measured. RESULTS: Pollen exposure significantly increased eosinophil, interleukin (IL) 5, IL-6, IL-13, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1ß levels in allergic patients but not in healthy individuals. The effect could be reproduced for eosinophils, IL-5, IL-6, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1ß after the second allergen challenge. By contrast, the IL-13 levels were higher and eotaxin levels first increased after repetitive allergen challenge. There was no correlation between total nasal symptom score and elevated cell or cytokine levels. Nasal nitric oxide levels were nonspecifically elevated in both patients with allergy and healthy controls. CONCLUSION: A subset of cellular and soluble biomarkers in nasal lavage and secretion reveals specificity and reproducibility in patients with allergic rhinitis. These can be used to measure the immunologic efficacy of antiallergic treatments in an allergen challenge chamber. Carryover effects attributable to priming must be considered when designing cross-over studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00297843.

Efficacy and safety of a novel nasal steroid, S0597, in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) poses a significant global burden with increasing prevalence. Although intranasal glucocorticosteroids are effective, older agents can have limiting side effects. S0597, a novel intranasal glucocorticosteroid, has demonstrated good safety and tolerability during preclinical and phase 1 studies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of different doses of S0597 nasal spray vs placebo in patients with seasonal AR. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center study randomized 159 patients 18 to 65 years old (mean age 37.8 years) with a positive skin prick test reaction for Dactylis glomerata to receive S0597 at 200, 400, or 800 µg/d or placebo for 15 days. On days 1 (baseline), 15, and 16, patients underwent a 4-hour pollen challenge to evaluate treatment efficacy measured by the change in total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from baseline to days 15 and 16 and changes in TNSS subscales and nasal secretion. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in TNSS from baseline to days 15 and 16 were observed with all S0597 doses vs placebo (P = .0005 overall), with the greatest improvements observed in the highest-dose group (P < .0001). Significant decreases were observed in each S0597 dose group vs placebo for TNSS subscales and nasal secretion. Improvements in nasal secretion were related to dose, with the greatest decreases from baseline in the 800-µg/d group on days 15 and 16 (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with S0597 at 200, 400, and 800 µg/d by 2 divided doses for 2 weeks was safe and significantly more effective than placebo for improving nasal symptoms associated with grass pollen-induced seasonal AR in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01614691.

Exacerbation of atopic dermatitis on grass pollen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber.

BACKGROUND: It has frequently been speculated that pruritus and skin lesions develop after topical exposure to aeroallergens in sensitized patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE: We sought to study cutaneous reactions to grass pollen in adult patients with AD with accompanying clear IgE sensitization to grass allergen in an environmental challenge chamber using a monocenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. METHODS: Subjects were challenged on 2 consecutive days with either 4000 pollen grains/m(3) of Dactylis glomerata pollen or clean air. The severity of AD was assessed at each study visit up to 5 days after challenge by (objective) scoring of AD (SCORAD). Additionally, air-exposed and non-air-exposed skin areas were each scored using local SCORAD scoring and investigator global assessments. Levels of a series of serum cytokines and chemokines were determined by using a Luminex-based immunoassay. The primary end point of the study was the change in objective SCORAD scores between prechallenge and postchallenge values. RESULTS: Exposure to grass pollen induced a significant worsening of AD. A pronounced eczema flare-up of air-exposed rather than covered skin areas occurred. In grass pollen-exposed subjects a significantly higher increase in CCL17, CCL22, and IL-4 serum levels was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that controlled exposure to airborne allergens of patients with a so-called extrinsic IgE-mediated form of AD induced a worsening of cutaneous symptoms.

Efficacy of the oral chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule on TH2 cells antagonist BI 671800 in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory response in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is partly mediated by the prostaglandin D2 receptor chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule on T(H)2 cells (CRTH2). OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of the oral CRTH2 antagonist BI 671800 (50, 200, and 400 mg twice daily), fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 µg once daily), or oral montelukast (10 mg once daily) administered for 2 weeks in patients with SAR. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, partial-crossover study, participants aged 18 to 65 years with a positive skin prick test to Dactylis glomerata pollen were exposed to out-of-season allergen in the environmental challenge chamber for 6 hours. The primary efficacy variable was the total nasal symptom score assessed as the area under the curve (AUC)(0-6h). RESULTS: In total, 146 patients (63.7% male; mean age, 36.1 years) were randomized. The adjusted mean total nasal symptom score AUC(0-6h) was significantly reduced versus placebo with 200 mg of BI 671800 (absolute difference, -0.85; percentage difference, -17%; P = .0026), montelukast (absolute difference, -0.74; percentage difference, -15%; P = .0115), and fluticasone propionate (absolute difference, -1.64; percentage difference, -33%; P < .0001). Compared with placebo, BI 671800 significantly reduced nasal eosinophil values (P < .05 for all doses), significantly inhibited nasal inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-4 and eotaxin, P < .05; 200 mg twice daily), and induced a dose-related reduction in ex vivo prostaglandin D2-mediated eosinophil shape change. CONCLUSION: Two hundred milligrams of BI 671800 twice daily demonstrated efficacy in treating SAR symptoms induced by environmental challenge chamber allergen exposure and had a favorable safety profile.

Pollen starch granules in bronchial inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Pollen grains with a diameter of more than 10 µm preferentially deposit in the upper airways. Their contribution to lower airway inflammation is unclear. One hypothesis is that lower airway inflammation is mainly caused by allergen containing pollen starch granules, which are released from the pollen grains and can easily enter the peripheral airways because of their smaller size. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differential effect of pollen grains and pollen starch granules on nasal symptoms and lower airway inflammation. METHODS: In a 2-period crossover design, 30 patients with allergic rhinitis and mild intermittent asthma underwent 2 allergen challenges on consecutive days in an environmental challenge chamber with either a mixture of pollen grains plus starch granules or starch granules only. End points were the total nasal symptom score (TNSS), nasal secretion weight, nasal flow, spirometry, and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). RESULTS: The presence of pollen grains had a significant and considerable effect on increase in TNSS and secretion weight and on decrease in nasal flow. Starch granules alone only had minimal effects on nasal symptoms. Challenges with starch granules significantly increased eNO. Pollen had no effect on eNO. CONCLUSION: Pollen grains cause nasal symptoms but do not augment lower airway inflammation, whereas starch granules trigger lower airway inflammation but hardly induce nasal symptoms.

Anti-allergic drug testing in an environmental challenge chamber is suitable both in and out of the relevant pollen season.

BACKGROUND: An environmental challenge chamber (ECC) is a useful tool to expose allergic patients to relevant allergens in a controlled indoor setting and to test anti-allergic treatment. Hitherto, ECC studies with grass pollen are conducted primarily outside of the pollen season to avoid the influence of natural pollen exposure. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an established anti-allergic treatment, a combination of cetirizine (CET) and pseudoephedrine (PSE), shows an equivalent treatment effect within and outside of the grass pollen season when tested in an ECC. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, four-way crossover study, the effect of a combination of 10 mg CET and 120 mg PSE compared with placebo on nasal symptoms, nasal flow, and nasal secretion was investigated in 70 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Subjects underwent four 6-hour pollen challenges in an ECC with administration of the drugs after 2 hours. Two challenges were conducted within the grass pollen season and two out of the grass pollen season. RESULTS: The active treatment significantly improved nasal symptoms and nasal flow and significantly reduced the amount of nasal secretion compared with placebo both within and outside of the pollen season (P < .0001 each). The treatment effect was not different between the seasons (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Controlled allergen provocation in an ECC can be used to test anti-allergic treatment both within and outside of the grass pollen season.