Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Reverse Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: A Single-Center Experience.

Outcomes of robotic-assisted reverse hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) remain hindered. We aimed to analyze midterm clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted reverse HCR. All consecutive 285 patients who underwent reverse robotic-assisted HCR between September 2005 and July 2021 were included. Reverse HCR comprises percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in non-left anterior descending (LAD) coronary arteries was performed within 30 days before robotic-assisted left internal thoracic artery (LITA) harvesting and LITA-to-LAD manual anastomosis through a 4-cm left minithoracotomy. Dual antiplatelet therapy was not interrupted in any patient. Preoperatively, mean age was 70.2 years (±11.2). Before surgery, 168 patients received 1 stent, 112 patients 2 stents, and 5 patients 3 stents. Intraoperatively, mean operating room time was 5.9 hours (±1); no case was converted to full sternotomy, whereas 9 patients (3.1%) received intraoperative blood product transfusions. Postoperatively, a small incidence of stroke, 1 (0.3%), reoperation for bleeding, 7 (2.4%), blood product transfusions, 48 (16.8%), and hospital stay (4.8 days) was observed. At 30-day follow-up, 1 patient (0.3%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stent on a surgical LITA-LAD anastomosis owing to graft failure. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years. Reported midterm outcomes included all-cause death in 31 patients (10.9%), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in 102 of 285 (35.9%), nonfatal stroke in 2 of 285 (0.7%), myocardial infarction in 17 of 285 (5.9%), and repeat intervention in 50 of 285 patients (17.5%). This single-center study reports effective and safe clinical outcomes at midterm follow-up of reverse HCR procedures for treating multivessel coronary artery disease.

Long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical coronary artery revascularisation.

BACKGROUND: Patients who are not candidates for traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and amenable only for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents can receive the "gold standard" left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) anastomosis through robotic-assisted CABG and PCI to non-LAD coronary targets. AIMS: We aimed to analyse clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted CABG. METHODS: A total of 2,280 consecutive patients who had undergone robotic-assisted CABG between May 2005 and June 2021 were included in our study. Robotic-assisted LITA harvest was followed by LITA-LAD manual anastomosis through a 4 cm left thoracotomy. Hybrid coronary intervention (HCR) consists of stent implantation in a non-LAD coronary artery performed within 7 days after robotic-assisted LITA-LAD. We performed a propensity-adjusted analysis comparison after dividing all robotic-assisted CABG patients into three time periods: 2005-2010, 615 patients; 2011-2016, 904 patients; and 2017-2021, 761 patients. RESULTS: The mean age increased from 64.5 years in the first time period to 65.8 years in the second time period to 68.1 years in the third (p<0.0001). Operative time was progressively reduced in the three periods (6.4; 6.2; 5.5 hours; p<0.001). The incidence of conversion to sternotomy remained similar for each period (1.8%; 1.7%; 1.5%; p=0.53). Thirty-day mortality in the three periods included 9 (1.4%), 9 (1.0%), and 7 (0.9%) patients, respectively (p=0.91), while 8 (0.3%) patients had PCI with stents in the entire group. The mean follow-up for the entire population was 4.2 years. At follow-up, the rates of all-cause death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, non-fatal stroke, and repeat revascularisation with stents were significantly decreased from the first to the last period (pË0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted CABG and HCR provide good long-term outcomes in patients who are not candidates for conventional CABG.

Embolic and Other Adverse Outcomes in Symptomatic Versus Asymptomatic Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (from the ORBIT-AF Registry).

Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) is being increasingly diagnosed via implantable devices, screening, and inpatient telemetry. Management of asymptomatic AF is controversial, in part, because the associated risks have not been well described. We examined the incidence of major adverse outcomes in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic AF using Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial, a nationwide US registry of AF patients. We compared stroke and/or non-central nervous system (CNS) embolism, major adverse cardiovascular and neurologic events, bleeding, and death in 9,319 asymptomatic (defined by European Heart Rhythm Association score = 1 or "no symptoms") versus symptomatic patients. Overall, median (interquartile) age was 75 (67 to 82) years, 3,944 (42%) were women, and 38% versus 37% were asymptomatic based on physician versus patient-reported symptoms. Compared with those with symptoms, physician-defined asymptomatic patients were less likely to be woman (35%/47%) or be on an antiarrhythmic agent (22%/33%), but were more likely to have permanent and/or persistent AF (51%/40%). CHA2DS2-VASc scores did not vary by symptom status. After adjustment, risk of first stroke and/or non-CNS embolism (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.63 to 1.16], p = 0.32), major adverse cardiovascular and neurologic events (HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.03], p = 0.11), bleeding (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.72 to 1.00], p = 0.05), and death (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.87 to 1.13], p = 0.88) were similar in asymptomatic (European Heart Rhythm Association = 1) and symptomatic AF, respectively. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to further define associated adverse events and delineate optimal prophylactic therapies in patients with asymptomatic AF.

Adoption of the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention and rates of vascular complications following transfemoral procedures: Insights from NCDR.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine the association between adopting the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and rates of vascular complications following transfemoral PCI. BACKGROUND: Recent studies raised concerns that operators adopting the transradial approach may lose their transfemoral access skills and experience increased rates of vascular complications. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from the NCDR CathPCI Registry to examine the rates of vascular complications among physicians who were femoral operators (>90% of cases) in 2010-2011 and later adopted the transradial approach to PCI among low-, intermediate-, or high-level adopters (≤33%, 34-66%, and >66%, respectively) in 2014-2015. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 1,704,708 procedures performed by 4,697 operators were included. Most operators were low-level adopters (80.7%), followed by intermediate (15.7) and high-level adopters (3.6%). Compared to the preadoption period, vascular complications of transfemoral PCIs following transradial adoption increased among low-level adopters (1.29%-1.59%, adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.24[1.20-1.28], P < 0.001), intermediate-level adopters (1.37%-1.92%, adjusted OR 1.40[1.29-1.53], P < 0.001), and high-level adopters (1.54%-1.93%, adjusted OR 1.26[1.00-1.58], P = 0.053).In the post-adoption period, there was increase in access site bleeding that is likely due to change in registry definition. There was no increase in hematomas, retroperitoneal bleeding or other vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of the transradial approach for PCI is not associated with clinically meaningful increase in rates of vascular complications of transfemoral PCIs.

Precatheterization Use of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Early Cardiac Catheterization and In-Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry®.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend early P2Y12 inhibitor administration in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, but it is unclear if precatheterization use is associated with longer delays to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or higher risk of post-CABG bleeding and transfusion. This study examines the patterns and outcomes of precatheterization P2Y12 inhibitor use in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients who undergo CABG. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis was done of 20 304 non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry (2009-2014) who underwent catheterization within 24 hours of admission and CABG during the index hospitalization. Using inverse probability-weighted propensity adjustment, we compared time from catheterization to CABG, post-CABG bleeding, and transfusion rates between patients who did and did not receive precatheterization P2Y12 inhibitors. Among study patients, 32.9% received a precatheterization P2Y12 inhibitor (of these, 2.2% were given ticagrelor and 3.7% prasugrel). Time from catheterization to CABG was longer among patients who received precatheterization P2Y12 inhibitor (median 69.9 hours [25th, 75th percentiles 28.2, 115.8] versus 43.5 hours [21.0, 71.8], P<0.0001), longer for patients treated with prasugrel (median 114.4 hours [66.5, 155.5]) or ticagrelor (90.4 hours [48.7, 124.5]) compared with clopidogrel (69.3 [27.5, 114.6], P<0.0001). Precatheterization P2Y12 inhibitor use was associated with a higher risk of post-CABG major bleeding (75.7% versus 73.4%, adjusted odds ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.22-1.45, P<0.0001) and transfusion (47.6% versus 35.7%, adjusted odds ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.41-1.62, P<0001); these relationships did not differ among patients treated with clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. CONCLUSIONS: Precatheterization P2Y12 inhibitor use occurs commonly among non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients who undergo early catheterization and in-hospital CABG. Despite longer delays to surgery, the majority of pretreated patients proceed to CABG <3 days postcatheterization. Precatheterization P2Y12 inhibitor use is associated with higher risks of postoperative bleeding and transfusion.

Utility of Hemoccult Testing Before Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Venous Thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVES: Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is performed routinely before starting therapeutic anticoagulation in patients despite it never being validated to predict gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) risk. Our objective was to determine the utility in checking the guaiac FOBT test (gFOBT) before initiating therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with a new diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review that examined patients with a diagnosis of VTE admitted during a 2-year period in one mid-sized tertiary care center. The gFOBT was performed before initiating anticoagulation, excluding patients with overt GIB, and analysis was performed to determine GIB outcomes. In addition, demographics, laboratory data, and comorbidities were recorded at the time of admission, and an admission hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke history, GIB history or predisposition, labile international normalization ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly (HAS-BLED) score was recorded to determine other factors that were predictive of new-onset GIB when starting anticoagulation. RESULTS: Initially, 718 patients with a new diagnosis of VTE were screened for 2 years. Ultimately, 375 patients were prescribed anticoagulation therapy and 244 had documented gFOBT. Of these 375, 14 (3.73%) had a GIB episode. A positive gFOBT was present on admission in 85.7% of those who bled (P < 0.001). The negative predictive value of gFOBT was 99.02%; however, the positive predictive value was only 30.77%. A HAS-BLED score >2 at admission significantly predicted GIB during admission as well (median 2.4 for those with GIB and 1.6 for those without GIB, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its beneficial negative predictive value, gFOBT before initiating therapeutic anticoagulation is unlikely to change the management of patients without evidence of overt GIB.

Mexiletine Prevents Recurrent Torsades de Pointes in Acquired Long QT Syndrome Refractory to Conventional Measures.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the role of mexiletine, a late sodium current (INa-L) blocker, in acute termination of torsades de pointes (TdP) refractory to conventional therapy in acquired long QT syndromes (LQTS). BACKGROUND: Long QT interval can predispose to TdP and is therefore associated with significant mortality. Currently, there is no available pharmacotherapy to target directly the ionic basis of most LQTS for the acute termination of TdP. Earlier evidence highlighted the role of INa-L in the pathophysiology of long QT and TdP, particularly in patients with congenital LQTS. METHODS: Twelve patients with TdP caused by acquired LQTS were treated with mexiletine after failure of conventional treatment including discontinuation of QT-prolonging drugs, intravenous administration of magnesium, and correction of serum electrolyte abnormalities. RESULTS: No recurrence of TdP occurred within 2 h after initiation of treatment with mexiletine in all 12 patients. Macro T-wave alternans accompanied by QT prolongation, an electrocardiographic precursor of TdP that was seen in 3 patients, was also abolished by mexiletine. Treatment with mexiletine shortened the QTc interval from 599 ± 27 ms to 514 ± 16 ms (p = 0.001). The interval from the peak to the end of the T-wave (Tp-e interval) decreased from 145 ± 18 ms to 106 ± 9 ms (p = 0.005). The Tp-e/QT ratio decreased from 0.27 ± 0.02 to 0.23 ± 0.018 (p = 0.01). Mexiletine had no significant effect on QRS complex duration. CONCLUSIONS: INa-L blockade with mexiletine may be an effective treatment approach to terminate refractory TdP from several acquired causes of LQTS.

Cellular and ionic basis of J-wave syndromes.

J-wave syndromes are disorders of ventricular repolarization characterized by prominent J waves on the ECG and have the potential to predispose affected individuals to lethal ventricular arrhythmias. These disorders share a common cellular mechanism with prominent Ito in ventricular epicardium. This current causes transmural dispersion of repolarization and the generation of phase 2 reentry, leading to short-coupled extrasystoles and VF. Several autonomic, chemical, and hormonal factors modulate Ito and are therefore vital in attenuating or increasing the arrhythmic potential of these syndromes. Future research should focus on evaluating the arrhythmogenic potential of patients with pathogenic genotypes and/or J waves and no history of VF.

Electrical failure of an ICD lead due to a presumed insulation defect only diagnosed by a maximum output shock.

A 55-year-old male patient presented after a single shock caused by oversensing of isolated nonphysiologic signals on both the distal HV and pace-sense channels. No other abnormalities were found. He subsequently returned complaining of device "vibration" and his St. Jude implantable defibrillator (ICD; St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) was found to be in VVI backup mode and could not be interrogated. Direct testing in the electrophysiology lab showed normal lead impedances and thresholds with an inability to reproduce the abnormal signals. Detailed cine fluoroscopy of the leads found no abnormalities. A new ICD was connected and successfully delivered a 20-joule shock but failed to deliver a maximum output (39-joule) shock. The new ICD was again found to be in backup mode. A new Endotak Reliance G lead (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) was implanted and a maximum-output shock was successful using a new Fortify DR ICD. This case likely represents a Durata lead insulation defect in the form of an inside-out abrasion under the distal HV coil. Increased awareness of this defect is warranted, particularly since routine interrogation and submaximum-output shocks may fail to detect the problem.

Perioperative management of a patient with a nonresectable pheochromocytoma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical course of a patient with a nonresectable pheochromocytoma during urgent hip surgery. METHODS: To describe the clinical management and postoperative outcome of the patient and review the relevant literature. RESULTS: An 85-year-old male with a nonresectable pheochromocytoma required urgent hip surgery following a traumatic hip fracture. He was perioperatively managed with phenoxybenzamine, metyrosine, and metoprolol to avoid potential pheochromocytoma-related complications. He remained hemodynamically stable and recovered from the surgery without complications. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates the successful management of a patient requiring urgent surgery in the setting of a nonresectable pheochromocytoma, which is rarely described in the literature.