ABSTRACT
Post-prescription review of hospital antibiotic therapy may contribute to more appropriate use. We estimated the impact of a standardised review of intravenous antibiotic therapy three days after prescription in two internal medicine wards of a university hospital. In one ward, we assessed the charts of patients under intravenous antibiotic therapy using a standardised review process and provided feedback to the prescriber. There was no intervention in the other ward. After six months we crossed the allocation between the two wards. In all, 204 courses of antibiotic therapy were included in the intervention periods and 226 in the control periods. Post-prescription review led to proposals for modification in 46% of antibiotic courses. Time to treatment modification was 22% shorter in the intervention periods compared with the control periods (3.9+/-5.2 days vs 5.0+/-6.0 days, P=0.007). Patients included in the intervention group had lower antibiotic consumption than patients in the control group, but the intervention had no significant impact on the overall antibiotic consumption of the two wards.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Drug Utilization Review/methods , Health Services Research , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization Review/standards , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Internal Medicine , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIM: To confirm the accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) procedure and its morbidity, and to investigate predictive factors for SN status and prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1997 and December 2004, 327 consecutive patients in one centre with clinically node-negative primary skin melanoma underwent an SNB by the triple technique, i.e. lymphoscintigraphy, blue-dye and gamma-probe. Multivariate logistic regression analyses as well as the Kaplan-Meier were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of the patients had at least one metastatic SN, which was significantly associated with Breslow thickness (p<0.001). The success rate of SNB was 99.1% and its morbidity was 7.6%. With a median follow-up of 33 months, the 5-year DFS/DSS were 43%/49% for patients with positive SN and 83.5%/87.4% for patients with negative SN, respectively. The false-negative rate of SNB was 8.6% and sensitivity 91.4%. On multivariate analysis, DFS was significantly worsened by Breslow thickness (RR=5.6, p<0.001), positive SN (RR=5.0, p<0.001) and male sex (RR=2.9, p=0.001). The presence of a metastatic SN (RR=8.4, p<0.001), male sex (RR=6.1, p<0.001), Breslow thickness (RR=3.2, p=0.013) and ulceration (RR=2.6, p=0.015) were significantly associated with a poorer DSS. CONCLUSION: SNB is a reliable procedure with high sensitivity (91.4%) and low morbidity. Breslow thickness was the only statistically significant parameter predictive of SN status. DFS was worsened in decreasing order by Breslow thickness, metastatic SN and male gender. Similarly DSS was significantly worsened by a metastatic SN, male gender, Breslow thickness and ulceration. These data reinforce the SN status as a powerful staging procedure.
Subject(s)
Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/secondary , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/adverse effects , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Plasma lipids can be affected by acute illnesses. The present study attempts to characterize the impact of infectious disease on plasma lipids in critical illness. It also aims to determine the value of plasma lipid routine measurements in the diagnosis of infection in critical illness in comparison to markers of infection and acute phase reactants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study was carried out in 101 critically ill patients admitted consecutively to a medical intensive care unit in a university medical centre. Levels of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and additional variables were measured in blood samples taken on the day of admission. RESULTS: In critically ill patients significantly lower levels of HDL-C and TC were found in infectious disease patients compared to non-infectious disease patients (P < 0.001). No significant differences in levels of TG were found between infectious and non-infectious disease patients. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) value for HDL-C and TC in the diagnosis of infection was 0.791 (P < 0.001) and 0.730 (P < 0.001), respectively. At a cutoff value for HDL-C of = 0.78 mmol L(-1), a sensitivity of 71.7% and a specificity of 86.0% were recorded. The AUC value of HDL-C was significantly (P < 0.001) inferior to procalcitonin (AUC: 0.967, P < 0.001) and non-significantly inferior to C-reactive protein (CRP) (AUC: 0.874, P < 0.001). HDL-C correlated with albumin (r = 0.7, P < 0.001) and CRP (r = -0.54, P < 0.001), but not with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. There was no significant difference between the plasma lipid concentrations in survivors and non-survivors. CONCLUSION: In critically ill infected patients, HDL-C and TC levels are lower than in non-infected critically ill patients. In this study the diagnostic accuracy of CRP is not better than the one of HDL-C. The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin is superior to HDL-C.