Successful Treatment of Disseminated Granuloma Annulare with Upadacitinib.

Disseminated granuloma annulare (DGA) is an inflammatory skin disorder characterized by more than 10 erythematous, raised, ring-shaped plaques. Its treatment remains challenging, with conventional therapies showing variable efficacy. We report the case of a woman in her 50s with a 2-year history of DGA refractory to multiple treatments. Given the recent evidence of the role of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway in the granuloma annulare pathophysiology, treatment with upadacitinib 30 mg per day was started with rapid effectiveness and good tolerance. This case underscores the potential of JAK inhibitors as promising therapeutic options for recalcitrant granuloma annulare.

Treatment of congenital Langerhans cell histiocytosis with cobimetinib.

We report a case of congenital multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis with cutaneous and hematopoietic involvement. After the failure of first-line (vinblastine and prednisolone) and second-line (vincristine and cytarabine) therapies, treatment with cobimetinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitor, led to the remission of disease and a sustained response after 11 months of ongoing treatment. Protein kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF or MEK could represent a promising future therapeutic option, also in children with LCH.

Belgian atopic dermatitis guidelines.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common, bothersome and difficult to treat skin disorders. Recent introduction of new systemic treatments has revolutionized the management of AD. The goal of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients suffering from atopic dermatitis that easily can be implemented in clinical practice. These recommendations were developed by 11 Belgian AD experts. Comments of all experts on the proposed statements were gathered, followed by an online voting session. The most relevant strategies for the management and treatment of AD in the context of the Belgian health care landscape are discussed. General measures, patient education and adequate topical treatment remain the cornerstones of AD management. For moderate to severe AD, the introduction of biologics and JAK inhibitors show unprecedented efficacy, although currently access is limited to a subgroup of patients meeting the reimbursement criteria.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerance of Baricitinib for the Treatment of Severe Alopecia Areata with 1-Year Follow-Up Data.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of conventional treatments for alopecia areata (AA) has been extremely variable and disappointing, with a high rate of relapse. Recent clinical trials and real-life studies have demonstrated efficacy and safety of baricitinib (an oral Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor) in alopecia areata. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and tolerance of baricitinib in alopecia areata in a real-life Belgian monocentric adult cohort. The primary outcome was evaluated by the percentage of patients who achieved a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score of ≤ 20 at the end of the follow-up. All treatment-emergent adverse events were collected. RESULTS: In this 19-patient series, with a median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up duration of 13 ± 16.2 months, we demonstrated that: (i) hair regrowth was observed in nearly 90% of patients between 4 and 16 weeks after initiation of baricitinib; (ii) at the end of the follow-up, more than 70% and, in particular, 100% of patients with patchy AA, reached the primary outcome (SALT score ≤ 20); (iii) almost half of the patients, mostly with patchy AA, showed a complete hair regrowth (SALT score = 0), within a median ± IQR treatment time of 8.5 ± 10 months; (iv) baricitinib was discontinued in three patients with total hair regrowth, two of whom relapsed; and (v) no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib is effective in treating patients with alopecia areata, particularly for the patchy phenotype, but with a risk of relapse after discontinuation. Safety data are reassuring, with lipid changes being the most frequent adverse event.

Sofa dermatitis: Value of patch test with 2-(thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole.

BACKGROUND: In 2008, numerous cases of allergic contact dermatitis caused by leather chairs (sofa dermatitis) were reported, with dimethylfumarate being the culprit allergen. However, octylisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone and cobalt have also been associated with cases of sofa dermatitis. An antifungal agent, 2-(thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole (TCMTB), has also previously been described as a contact allergen in leather. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients were referred to the Department of Dermatology of the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium with suspicion of allergic contact dermatitis caused by leather sofas. They were patch tested with the European Baseline Series, additional series (according to the patients' history and clinical aspect of the eruption), dimethylfumarate (4/7 patients) and with TCMTB. RESULTS: All seven patients presented a positive reaction to TCMTB and only one presented a concomitant positive reaction to dimethylfumarate. All patients showed clinical improvement after avoiding contact with their leather sofa. CONCLUSION: 2-(Thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole (TCMTB) is probably an underestimated allergen present in leather chairs (responsible for the so-called 'sofa dermatitis'), and more generally in leather objects. It is, therefore, important to test with TCMTB 0.1% petrolatum in case of contact dermatitis related with leather products.

Real-Life Experience of Tralokinumab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicentric Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Tralokinumab, the first fully human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to interleukin-13, was safe and effective for treating atopic dermatitis (AD) in clinical trials, but real-life experience is still limited. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab in severe AD in a real-life multicenter prospective cohort. METHODS: Adult patients with severe AD were enrolled between January 2022 and July 2022 and received tralokinumab subcutaneously for 16 weeks. Objective and subjective scores were collected at baseline, weeks 6 and 16. Adverse events were reported throughout the study. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included. An improvement of at least 75% on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) was achieved in 66.7% of patients at week 16. The median objective and subjective scores at week 16 were significantly (p < 0.001) lower than those at baseline. Combination with cyclosporine was sometimes necessary at the beginning of treatment, and addition of upadacitinib was required for some patients with very severe disease during the treatment. The most frequent adverse events were flares of eczema (23.8%) and reactions at injection site (19.0%). No cases of conjunctivitis were reported. Four patients (19.0%) discontinued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab is an effective first-line biotherapy for severe AD. However, therapeutic response may be progressive. Safety data were reassuring. Atopic dermatitis flares or reactions at the injection site may lead to discontinuation of treatment. A history of conjunctivitis on dupilumab is not a contraindication to the initiation of tralokinumab.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerance of Upadacitinib for Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Adolescents and Adults.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis have been defined in clinical trials, but long-term real-life experience, essential for clinical decision-making, is still limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of upadacitinib in a real-life cohort of adults and adolescents with severe atopic dermatitis in whom previous systemic therapies largely failed. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study collecting data from adults and adolescents treated with upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg per day between July 2021 to August 2022. The outcomes for effectiveness were evaluated by the percentage of patients who achieved a validated Investigator's Global Assessment for atopic dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and/or an improvement of at least 75% on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at the end of the follow-up. All treatment-emergent adverse events were collected. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were included (22 adults and 7 adolescents), with a median follow-up of 54.4 weeks. At the end of the follow-up, 23 patients (79.3%) reached a vIGA-AD of 0/1, and 24 patients (82.7%) achieved EASI 75. Among patients treated with upadacitinib after initial failure of first- and/or second-line treatment with biologics or baricitinib, 5/7 patients (71.4%) reached a vIGA-AD score of 0/1. Disease control was slightly better in adults than in adolescents (81.8% vs 71.4% reached the efficacy endpoint, respectively). Response rate in patients with upadacitinib 15 mg seemed better than in clinical trials or network meta-analysis. Safety data were reassuring; lipid changes were the most frequent adverse event. CONCLUSION: This real-life study confirms the effectiveness of upadacitinib, particularly for the treatment of atopic dermatitis recalcitrant to conventional systemic agents, biologics or baricitinib. Induced lipid changes require close follow-up.

Chilblains observed during the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be distinguished from classic, cold-related chilblains

Background: Type 1 interferon (IFN-I) response induced by SARS-CoV-2 has been hypothesized to explain the association between chilblain lesions (CL) and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Objective: To explore direct cytopathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in CL and to focus on IFN-I expression in patients with chilblains. Materials & Methods: A monocentric cohort of 43 patients presenting with CL from April 2020 to May 2021 were included. During this period, all CL were, a priori, considered to be SARS-CoV-2-related. RT-qPCR on nasopharyngeal swabs and measurements of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were performed. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunostainings as well as SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR were performed on biopsy specimens of CL and controls. Expression of MX1 and IRF7 was analysed on patients' biopsy specimens and/or PBMC and compared with controls and/or chilblains observed before the pandemic. Serum IFN-α was also measured. Results: RT-qPCR was negative in all patients and serological tests were positive in 11 patients. Immunostaining targeting viral proteins confirmed the lack of specificity. SARS-CoV-2 RNA remained undetected in all CL specimens. MX1 immunostaining was positive in CL and in pre-pandemic chilblains compared to controls. MX1 and IRF7 expression was significantly increased in CL specimens but not in PBMC. Serum IFN-α was undetected in CL patients. Conclusion: CL observed during the pandemic do not appear to be directly related to SARS-CoV-2 infection, either based on viral cytopathogenicity or high IFN-I response induced by the virus.

Pandemic chilblains: Are they SARS-CoV-2-related or not?

The exact etiopathology of chilblains observed during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is still unclear. Initially, SARS-CoV-2 appeared as the obvious causing agent, but two years of various investigations have failed to convincingly support its direct implication. Most affected individuals have no detectable virus, no anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and no symptoms of COVID-19. Analyses of skin biopsies similarly failed to unambiguously demonstrate presence of the virus or its genome. In a recent hypothesis, SARS-CoV-2 would cause the lesions before being promptly eliminated by unusually strong type I interferon responses. With others, we feel that environmental factors have not been sufficiently considered, in particular cold exposure related to unprecedented containment measures. The cause of pandemic chilblains remains a stimulating puzzle which warrants further investigation.