ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Social cognitive functions in adults with ADHD were investigated in a virtual social exchange game. METHOD: The sample consisted of 40 participants (20 adult ADHD participants, 20 healthy controls). Participants played a multiround trust game with virtual trustees who differed in regard to fairness and presence of emotional facial cues. RESULTS: Investments were higher in ADHD participants than in healthy participants except for partners who played fair with constant neutral expressions. ADHD patients did not adapt their behavior to the fairness of the trustee. In the presence of emotional facial cues, ADHD and healthy participants transferred more monetary units to happy rather than angry-looking trustees. Differences in investment behavior were not linked to deficits in emotion-recognition abilities or cognitive dysfunctions. CONCLUSION: Alterations in interaction behavior and in the formation of a general attitude toward social partners could be shown in adults with ADHD.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Cognition/physiology , Emotions , Interpersonal Relations , Social Behavior , Trust/psychology , Adult , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Cues , Expressed Emotion , Facial Expression , Female , Humans , Male , Memory, Short-Term , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Recognition, Psychology/physiology , Theory of MindABSTRACT
Different domains of executive function such as working memory and response inhibition were investigated together with elementary cognitive processes in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Patients with BPD (N=28) were compared to nonpatient controls (NP, N=28) on eight tasks (e.g. n-back, Go/NoGo, CPT-AX). In order to separate impairments in different cognitive domains and to assess the influence of more elementary cognitive processes on executive functioning, tasks were embedded in a reaction-time-decomposition approach. BPD patients solved tasks with accuracies comparable to those of nonpatients. The only exception was the n-back task, for which working memory is required: here, error rates were higher and increased more prominently in BPD patients depending on working memory load. In most tasks, movement times were shorter for BPD patients than for nonpatients, while the quality of task-solving was comparable. The faster processing in the BPD group was observable starting with the simplest task, i.e. a simple reaction-time task. These findings suggest that domains of executive functioning are differentially affected in BPD. In contrast to load-dependent deficits in working memory, response inhibition processes were unimpaired. Faster action-related processes could be observed in BPD patients in a variety of tasks; however, these did not influence executive functioning.
Subject(s)
Borderline Personality Disorder/complications , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Executive Function/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Choice Behavior/physiology , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Impulsive Behavior/diagnosis , Impulsive Behavior/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Reaction Time/physiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Young AdultABSTRACT
To gain further insight into interpersonal dysfunction in Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) we investigated the effects of emotional cues and the fairness of a social partner on the ability to infer other peoples' intentions in a virtual social exchange. 30 BPD patients and 30 nonpatients were asked to play a multiround trust game with four virtual trustees. The trustees varied in regard to fairness and presence of emotional facial cues which were both linked to repayment ratio. BPD patients adjusted their investment to the fairness of their partner. In contrast, nonpatients disregarded the trustees' fairness in the presence of emotional facial expressions. Both groups performed equally in an emotion recognition task and assessed the trustees' fairness comparably. When the unfair trustee provided emotional cues, BPD patients assessed their own behavior as more fair, while the lack of cues led patients to assess their own behavior as unfair. BPD patients are superior in the attribution of mental states to interaction partners when emotional cues are present. While the emotional expressions of a partner dominated the exchange behavior in nonpatients, BPD patients used the objective fairness of their social counterparts to guide their own behavior despite the existence of emotional cues.
