Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(4): ofab088, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33884275

ABSTRACT

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a vasculitis that mostly occurs in children, but rare cases in adults have been reported. We describe the case of a 43-year-old Swiss male who developed symptoms compatible with KD 7 weeks after leptospirosis, which was presumably acquired after swimming in a creek in the Swiss Alps. We performed a literature review and identified 10 other cases (all in children), in which Kawasaki-like disease was diagnosed in the context of leptospirosis. Outcome was favourable in most cases, including our patient. This exceptional case demonstrates both the possibility of autochthonous cases of leptospirosis in Switzerland as well as a possible association of leptospirosis with Kawasaki-like disease.

2.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 43(5): 1078-1084, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33709561

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: CD56 is aberrantly expressed in myeloid neoplasms including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Considering the adhesion effects of CD56, blast quantification in bone marrow might depend on the technique used to obtain respective diagnostic specimens. Therefore, the objective of our study was to investigate the impact of CD56-expression on blast counts in myeloid neoplasms comparing bone marrow aspirates to biopsies. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients diagnosed with MDS and AML. We compared patients with (n = 36) and without (n = 39) CD56-expression by flow cytometry with respect to their blast quantities assessed on bone marrow aspirates versus biopsies. RESULTS: The frequency of CD56-expression on blasts correlated with higher blast counts on biopsies vs. aspirate smears (rs  = 0.52; P = .001). This difference in blast counts was only significant in the CD56 high expressing subgroup (median 68%, 5.5%-95% in biopsy compared to median 32.5%, 1.5%-90% in aspirate; P < .01). The percentage of CD56-positive blasts among the total blast population was lower in the peripheral blood compared to bone marrow (median 31%, 6%-88% vs. 55%, 14%-98%; P = .016). The discrepancy in the blast count between the aspirate and trephine biopsy would have led to misclassification of four cases as MDS instead of AML, if diagnosis had based on the bone marrow aspirate blast count alone. CONCLUSION: Counting blasts in bone marrow aspirates of CD56-positive AML and MDS may be linked to underestimation, potentially leading to misclassification of these myeloid neoplasms, and should therefore be adjusted considering the results obtained on trephine biopsies for reliable diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/pathology , CD56 Antigen/analysis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aspartic Acid/chemistry , Biopsy/methods , Cell Count , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
J Clin Med ; 9(3)2020 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32168931

ABSTRACT

Our objective was to compare informal physicians' disease severity ratings (PDSR) at presentation with the well-established Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in order to test for non-inferiority of the discriminatory ability regarding hospitalization, intensive care, and mortality. We made a prospective observational study with consecutive enrollment. At presentation, the PDSR and subsequently Emergency Severity Index (ESI) levels were recorded. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority of the discriminatory ability (PDSR versus ESI) regarding hospitalization, intensive care, and mortality. The secondary outcomes were the reliability, the predictive validity, and the safety of PDSR. We included 6859 patients. The median age was 51 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 33 to 72 years); 51.4% were males. There were 159 non-survivors (2.4%) at the 30 day follow-up. The PDSR's discriminatory ability was non-inferior to the ESI's discriminatory ability. The safety assessment showed mortality of <0.5% in low-acuity patients in both tools. The predictive validity increased by 3.5 to 7 times if adding high-acuity PDSR to ESI in all categories with mortality of >1%. Our data showed the non-inferiority of PDSR compared with ESI regarding discriminatory ability, a moderate reliability, and an acceptable safety of both tools.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...