Perceived clinical utility of the suicide crisis syndrome: A multisite pilot study.

Perceived usefulness in the clinical setting is important in the implementation of novel constructs and assessments. The suicide crisis syndrome (SCS) has been proposed and validated as a theoretical framework for assessing acute suicide risk, but clinicians' perceptions of the SCS have not yet been examined. In this study, we evaluated perceived utility of the SCS across several provider locations to assess its perceived value as a clinical tool. A sample of 47 practitioners across three sites who had received education about, but no implementation of, the SCS, and a separate sample of 52 practitioners at a site that had systematically implemented the SCS, completed a survey assessing its feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, incremental helpfulness, and overall clinical utility. In both samples, clinicians reported favorable ratings for feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, incremental helpfulness, and overall clinical utility. In Sample 1, clinicians with previous experience using the SCS reported significantly higher ratings for all categories except incremental helpfulness than those without prior SCS use. In Sample 2, there were no significant differences in ratings between participants with or without prior use of SCS. Comparison of the two samples found no significant differences in all categories except acceptability, as those in Sample 2 showed significantly higher ratings. Regardless of implementation, clinicians reported generally favorable perceptions of the SCS, and those from the implementation sample reported significantly higher acceptability of its use. This suggests that clinicians may be supportive of the use and implementation of the SCS in clinical settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Factor Structure and Validity of the Suicidal Narrative Inventory Among Indian Adults.

Background: The suicidal narrative is a presuicidal state comprising several risk factors for suicide and is assessed using the Suicidal Narrative Inventory (SNI). Aims To assess the internal structure, reliability, and validity of SNI among Indian adults. Methods Between August 2020 and January 2021, the SNI, together with other self-report measures, was administered to adult respondents using an online anonymized questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was carried out to test the factor structure of the SNI. Results Usable responses were obtained from 302 participants (Mage = 43.5 ± 17.9 years, 53.6% female). The results of an eight-factor CFA of the SNI resulted in good model fit (χ2 [637] = 969.73, p < .001, comparative fit index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation = .04). Internal consistencies of SNI subscale scores ranged from acceptable to excellent (range α = .67-.92). Most subscales significantly converged with other measures although these associations were minimal for the goal disengagement and reengagement subscales. Limitations The use of an online survey method to collect data introduced sampling bias. Conclusion The eight-factor CFA of the SNI, among Indian adults, was consistent with prior data. Our findings provide preliminary support for the use of SNI to assess the suicidal narrative construct among Indian adults.

Predictive validity and symptom configuration of proposed diagnostic criteria for the Suicide Crisis Syndrome: A replication study.

OBJECTIVE: The Suicide Crisis Syndrome (SCS) is a new proposed suicide-specific diagnosis. In the present large replication study, we examine SCS diagnostic criteria to determine which configuration of symptoms demonstrates the strongest convergent and predictive validity for near-term suicidal behaviour. METHODS: We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the factor structure of the proxy-SCS variables derived from an extensive self-report test battery and administered to 903 psychiatric patients (age (M = 36.70, SD = 13.91); gender (64.0% female)) at intake and 4-8-week follow-up assessments. Convergent and predictive validity of five configurations of the proposed SCS diagnostic criteria for suicidal ideation (SI) and attempts (SA) were examined using regression analyses. The new clinician-rated SCS-Checklist was piloted with 68 participants. RESULTS: Both the one-factor and the five-factor models of proxy-SCS variables exhibited strong model fit, supporting the uni-dimensionality as well as the five-criteria structure of the SCS. All four configurations were uniquely related to the presence of a suicide attempt at follow-up when controlling for intake SI, lifetime SA, age, and gender, but none were significantly associated with intake SA when controlling for intake SI, age, and gender. All bivariate correlations between proxy-assessed and checklist-assessed SCS symptom configurations were significant and positive. CONCLUSION: The proposed five-symptom structure of the SCS diagnostic criteria was supported and appears to describe a clinically meaningful syndrome specifically related to near-term suicidal behaviour. SCS assessment may significantly improve clinical evaluation of imminent suicide risk. Future studies are needed to assess the utility of the syndrome in clinical settings.

Factor structure and validity of the Revised Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI-2) among Indian adults.

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of cross-cultural data on the psychometric properties of the revised Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI)- 2. Our objective was to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the SCI-2 among Indian adults. METHODS: Using an online survey method, between August 20, 2020 and January 31, 2021, an anonymous questionnaire containing general sociodemographic information and self-report measures was circulated over email and social media. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) of the SCI-2 was carried out. We also examined the internal consistency of the SCI-2 and tested its convergent validity against the Suicide Narrative Inventory (SNI) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). RESULTS: A total of 302 participants (Mean age = 43.5 ± 17.9 years, 53.6% female) were obtained. Results of the one-factor CFA indicated good model fit (χ2[1769] = 5368.75, p < 0.001, Comparative Fit Index [CFI] =0.99, Root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] =0.08). Similarly, the five-factor CFA also exhibited strong model fit (χ2[1759] = 4215.54, p < 0.001, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA =0.07). Comparison of these models indicated that the five-factor model demonstrated superior model fit (Δχ2[10] = 278.88, p < 0.001). The SCI-2 total and subscale scores showed excellent internal consistency and good convergent validity against most domains of the SNI and PSS-10. CONCLUSION: Among Indian adults, the SCI-2 demonstrated good psychometric properties with the proposed five-factor solution providing the best fit. These findings provide support for the SCI construct and its assessment with the SCI-2 in an Asian setting.

Comparative clinical utility of screening for Suicide Crisis Syndrome versus suicidal ideation in relation to suicidal ideation and attempts at one-month follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Suicidal ideation (SI) has numerous limitations in predicting suicidal behavior. The Suicide Crisis Syndrome (SCS) is proposed as an alternative method of detecting risk. This study compares the relative utility of SI and SCS in statistically predicting SI and behaviors at one-month follow-up. METHODS: 382 psychiatric patients (98 inpatients, 284 outpatients) completed baseline measures and provided information about suicide-related outcomes one month later. Participants were grouped based on responses to measures assessing SCS and SI. RESULTS: Rates of follow-up suicidal behavior were significantly higher among those reporting both SCS and SI (22.2%) than those reporting SI alone (6.0%) or neither SCS nor SI (0.9%). SCS alone (8.3%) had descriptively, but not statistically, higher rates of suicidal behavior than those with neither SCS nor SI, and did not differ from SI alone and the combination of SCS and SI. Those reporting SI-with and without SCS-had higher levels of follow-up suicidal thoughts than those without SI. CONCLUSION: The SCS was equivalent to SI, and incrementally informative alongside SI, in detecting individuals at risk of future suicidal behavior, whereas SI was more strongly related to future SI than SCS. The combination of SCS and SI may be clinically useful in detecting individuals who are at risk for suicide.