Association Between Antiseizure Drug Monotherapy and Mortality for Patients With Poststroke Epilepsy.

Importance: There is little evidence to guide the choice of antiseizure medication (ASM) for patients with poststroke epilepsy. Theoretical concerns about detrimental effects of ASMs on survival exist. Enzyme-inducing drugs could interfere with secondary stroke prevention. The US Food and Drug Administration recently issued a safety announcement about the potential proarrhythmic properties of lamotrigine. Objective: To investigate whether mortality varies with specific ASMs among patients with poststroke epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study was conducted using individual-level data from linked registers on all adults in Sweden with acute stroke from July 1, 2005, to December 31, 2010, and subsequent onset of epilepsy before December 31, 2014. A total of 2577 patients receiving continuous ASM monotherapy were eligible for the study. Data were analyzed between May 27, 2019, and April 8, 2021. Exposures: The dispensed ASM (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code N03A) determined exposure status, and the first dispensation date marked the start of treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, all-cause death, was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression with carbamazepine as the reference. Cardiovascular death (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes I0-I99 as the underlying cause) was assessed using Fine-Gray competing risk regression models. Results: A total of 2577 patients (1400 men [54%]; median age, 78 years [IQR, 69-85 years]) were included. The adjusted hazard ratio of all-cause death compared with carbamazepine was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60-0.86) for lamotrigine, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.15) for levetiracetam, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.23-1.59) for valproic acid, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.88-1.51) for phenytoin, and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.81-1.66) for oxcarbazepine. The adjusted hazard ratio of cardiovascular death compared with carbamazepine was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61-0.95) for lamotrigine, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99) for levetiracetam, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.19-1.64) for valproic acid, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.71-1.47) for phenytoin, and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.42-1.18) for oxcarbazepine. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study's findings suggest differences in survival between patients treated with different ASMs for poststroke epilepsy. Patients receiving lamotrigine monotherapy had significantly lower mortality compared with those receiving carbamazepine. The opposite applied to patients prescribed valproic acid, who had a higher risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death. Levetiracetam was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death compared with carbamazepine, but there was no significant difference in overall mortality.

Clinical experience combined with therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide.

OBJECTIVE: Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with insufficient clinical experience in patients with intellectual disability (ID). They often have more severe epilepsy with comorbidities. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with refractory epilepsy with and without ID in a real-life setting, taking drug monitoring (TDM) data into account therapeutic. METHODS: Retrospectively, we identified 344 patients using LCM from the TDM service covering the majority of the country, at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2013-2018). Clinical and TDM data were available for 132 patients. RESULTS: Forty-four of the 132 patients (33%) had ID. The retention rate was significantly higher in the ID vs the non-ID group after 1 year (84% vs 68%, P < .05). By combining clinical and TDM data, we demonstrated that 37/38 responding patients had serum concentrations above the lower limit of the reference range (>10 µmol/L), and 16/17 with lower concentrations were non-responders. Mean serum concentration/dose ratios were similar in both groups, 0.06 and 0.07 µmol/L/mg. There were no significant differences regarding efficacy and tolerability. The risk of LCM withdrawal was significantly higher when LCM was added to sodium channel blockers, even if the latter was discontinued. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide was generally well tolerated in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, where one third had ID, and in these patients the retention rate was higher. The combination of clinical and TDM data could possibly facilitate LCM therapy in these vulnerable patients.

Treatment and challenges with antiepileptic drugs in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) may have uncontrolled seizures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use and challenges with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the patients' view of these challenges. METHOD: A questionnaire about the use of AEDs, adherence to therapy, and quality of life was given to patients with JME recruited from Drammen Hospital. Data regarding AEDs were confirmed from medical records at Drammen Hospital, Norway (2007-2018). Additional clinical interviews were performed, and a mixed method approach was applied. RESULTS: Ninety patients with defined JME diagnosis, 54/36 women/men aged 14-39 (mean: 25) years, were included. Only 29 (33%) were seizure-free. Within the last year, 21% experienced generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), and 68% had myoclonic jerks. Seventy-six (84%) used AEDs, 78% in monotherapy. A total of 10 AEDs were used;: most commonly valproate (n = 33), lamotrigine (n = 27), and levetiracetam (n = 21). Two-thirds of valproate users were men while all other AEDs were used more in females than in men. Valproate and levetiracetam displayed better efficacy against GTCS than lamotrigine. One-third often/sometimes forgot their medication nonintentionally while 14% had intentional poor adherence. The majority reported good quality of life (76%). No significant correlations between the use of AEDs, use of valproate, poor adherence, quality of life score, and seizure freedom were demonstrated. Half of the patients had serum concentrations measured every year, and two-thirds thought this was important. Qualitative interviews elucidated treatment challenges in JME;, adverse effect burden, adherence, and activities of daily life. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of AEDs in the majority of patients, only one-third were seizure-free. Other challenges included polypharmacy, the use of valproate in women, and variable adherence. This points to a need for closer follow-up in patients with JME.

Long-term follow-up with therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with juvenile myoclonus epilepsy (JME) may experience uncontrolled seizures and challenges regarding adherence. Implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may contribute to individualization of the therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The purpose of this study was to investigate how the treatment of patients with JME is monitored and to demonstrate pharmacokinetic variability within and between patients with a long-term TDM approach. METHOD: Retrospective data from patients with JME from the TDM-database at Drammen Hospital and the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2007-2018) were included. RESULTS: Data from 80 of 90 patients with JME using AEDs with TDM measurements was included (88%, 49/31 women/men aged 14-39). One third (27, 33%) was seizure free, 19 (24%) had generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and 53 (66%) myoclonic seizures during the last year. The most common AEDs measured included lamotrigine, valproate, and levetiracetam. Long-term TDM demonstrated variability over time expressed as intra-patient median values and inter-patient ranges of 19% (7-47) for valproate, 43% (10-83) for lamotrigine and 35% (6-111) for levetiracetam. Fifteen pecent (83/563) of serum concentrations were below the reference ranges and clould be due to variable adherence. Comedication with valproate for lamotrigine and pregnancy contributed to variability. The applicability is illustrated in a case of 10 years' follow-up in a young woman. CONCLUSION: There was extensive pharmacokinetic variability of AEDs in and between patients with JME. A long-term TDM approach may contribute to closer monitoring of patients with JME and be used as a practical tool during clinical consultations.

Safety aspects of antiepileptic drugs-a population-based study of adverse effects relative to changes in utilisation.

PURPOSE: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly used, and knowledge about adverse effects is scarce based on clinical studies. The purpose of the present study was to characterise adverse effects reports of AEDs in Norway relative to changes in utilisation in various indications from population-based data to elucidate important safety aspects of use of AEDs. METHODS: Aggregated data of adverse effects reported for AEDs in Norway from the EudraVigilance-database (2004-2013) in addition to indication-specific use of AEDs during 2004-2015 from the Norwegian Prescription Database were used. RESULTS: The use of AEDs increased twofold the last decade due to use in psychiatry and neuropathic pain: lamotrigine, pregabalin, gabapentin, valproate, and carbamazepine. There were 1593 adverse effects reported (403 Individual Case Safety Reports, 2/3 women), 0-95 years (mean 46). Most adverse effects were reported for pregabalin (593), carbamazepine (265), lamotrigine (206), gabapentin (144), and valproate (119), where pregabalin had by far the highest reports in relation to the number of users. The most frequently reported adverse drug effects included rash, dizziness, cross-sensitivity reactions, and pyrexia. Overall, nervous system disorders constitute the largest organ class with the majority of the reports. Reporting of fatal outcomes is mandatory, and sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) was reported in 34 occasions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that most adverse effects reported concerned AEDs increasingly used in non-epilepsy indications: neuropathic pain (pregabalin, gabapentin, carbamazepine) and psychiatry (lamotrigine, valproate, carbamazepine). Pregabalin had the highest prevalence of adverse effects reported in relation to number of users. This elucidates an important part of pharmacovigilance for improved safety and considerations in clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetic Variability and Clinical Use of Lacosamide in Children and Adolescents in Denmark and Norway.

BACKGROUND: The indication for the antiepileptic drug lacosamide (LCM) was recently extended to include children from the age of 4 years. Real-life data on the use and serum concentrations of LCM in children and adolescents are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of LCM in this patient group in relation to age, comedication, dose, serum concentrations and duration of treatment, and to examine pharmacokinetic variability. METHODS: Children and adolescents (<18 years) who had serum concentrations of LCM measured from January 2012 to June 2018 were retrospectively identified from the therapeutic drug monitoring databases at 2 national epilepsy centers in Norway and Denmark. Clinical data were collected from request forms and medical records. RESULTS: Data from 124 patients were included, 61 girls/63 boys. Weight was available for 76 patients. Median age was 15 years (range 2-17 years), dose of LCM 300 mg/d (76-600 mg/d), and serum concentration 18 µmol/L (5-138 µmol/L) [4.5 mg/L (1.3-34.5 mg/L)]. Pharmacokinetic variability was demonstrated as the concentration/(dose/kg) ratio ranged from 1.3 to 9.4 (µmol/L)/(mg/kg) and was affected by age. Polytherapy with 1-3 other antiepileptic drugs was noted in 107 patients (86%). Treatment was continued beyond 1 year in 71% (n = 45) of the 63 patients where such information was available, and all of these 45 patients had serum concentrations within the defined reference range. The 1-year retention rate was higher in patients not concomitantly using other sodium channel-blocking drugs (82% versus 56%). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates pharmacokinetic variability in and between age groups, which indicates usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. More than two-thirds of patients continued treatment beyond 1 year, suggesting reasonable effectiveness.

Pharmacokinetic variability of valproate during pregnancy - Implications for the use of therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Use of valproate (VPA) in women of childbearing age is restricted due to dose-dependent risk of teratogenicity. The purpose of this study was to characterise pharmacokinetic variability of VPA in pregnancy, and discuss use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as guidance to exposure in women. METHOD: Measurements of trough total and unbound VPA concentrations before, during and after pregnancy, at assumed steady-state were collected from the TDM-database (2006-2016) at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway. Additional clinical data were obtained from the Oppland county Perinatal Database (1994-2011). RESULTS: Data from 51 pregnancies in 33 women aged 19-40 years were included. Each woman underwent 1-4 pregnancies, and 1-7 measurements per pregnancy were performed. The variability in total concentration/dose (C/D)-ratios between women was 13-fold, and intra-patient variability extensive. Total C/D-ratios were reduced by 46% from before pregnancy to third trimester (0.48-0.29 µmol/L/mg). Unbound concentrations of VPA were only requested in 10% of the pregnancies. Repeated measurements from two pregnancies in one women revealed increased unbound concentration of VPA during pregnancy. There were 19 with idiopathic generalized epilepsy and two focal based on clinical data from 21 women and 38 pregnancies; 1 major congenital malformation was noted. CONCLUSION: There is pronounced pharmacokinetic variability of VPA during pregnancy. Unbound concentrations are rarely requested. TDM should be used by measurements of both total and unbound concentrations since total concentrations may be misleading for efficacy and fetal exposure of VPA.

Utilisation and polypharmacy aspects of antiepileptic drugs in elderly versus younger patients with epilepsy: A pharmacoepidemiological study of CNS-active drugs in Norway, 2004-2015.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many patients with epilepsy use antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in combination. The elderly is a vulnerable group regarding polypharmacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in utilisation of AEDs, and the extent of polypharmacy with other CNS-active drugs in elderly versus younger patients in Norway. METHODS: This pharmacoepidemiological study included all prescriptions of antiepileptic, antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs from Norwegian pharmacies in the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) (2004-2015). Variables included number of patients, utilisation in defined daily doses, age, gender, and diagnosis specific reimbursement codes for AEDs. RESULTS: The use of AEDs has increased in all age groups in this population-based study in Norway. In the elderly, AEDs used in neuropathic pain (mainly gabapentin and pregabalin) have increased more than 10-fold (from 0.7 to 9.6 DDDs/1000 elderly/day, 2004-2015), while the prevalence of users is four times more than in younger patients. Polypharmacy between antiepileptic, antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs occurred in 35% of elderly and 38% of younger patients with epilepsy. The use of enzyme-inducers was common, and occurred more often in elderly patients. A total of 42 different interactions that may have clinical implications were identified among these drugs. CONCLUSION: The use of AEDs in elderly compared to younger patients is increasing, especially in neuropathic pain. Polypharmacy with antiepileptic, antidepressant and/or antipsychotic drugs was documented in more than one third of the patients. Awareness of increased drug utilisation, polypharmacy with potential drug interactions, and focus on elderly patients are important for increased patient safety.

Pharmacokinetic variability of valproate in women of childbearing age.

The purpose was to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of valproic acid (VPA) in women of childbearing age by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data to elucidate the variable relationship between dose and serum concentrations with the ultimate aim of facilitating safer use of VPA. Anonymized retrospective data from the TDM database (2006-2015) at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway were used. Trough total concentrations of VPA at assumed steady state in women aged 14-46 years were analyzed. Data from 643 nonpregnant women of childbearing age (mean age = 27 years) were included. Mean dose and serum concentration of VPA were 968 (standard deviation [SD] = 453) mg/day and 411 (SD = 138) µmol/L, respectively, and 59% used polytherapy. The pharmacokinetic variability in serum concentration/dose (C/D) ratios between women was extensive. For doses <700 mg/day (n = 202; 32%; 150-625 mg/day), mean serum concentration was 336 µmol/L and variability in C/D ratio was 10-fold. The variability decreased with increasing dose to eightfold (≥700 to <1,500 mg/day, n = 358) and fourfold (≥1,500 mg/day, n = 96). This study demonstrates the extensive pharmacokinetic variability of VPA among women of childbearing age, which is most pronounced at low doses. In future studies, serum concentrations of VPA, rather than dosage, should be used as a guide for exposure of VPA and possible risks of teratogenicity to evaluate safety aspects of VPA in women.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lacosamide in Norway: Focus on Pharmacokinetic Variability, Efficacy and Tolerability.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED). Experience from therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice is limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic variability of LCM in relation to efficacy and tolerability in patients with refractory epilepsy in a real-life setting. Variables included age, gender, daily doses and serum concentrations of LCM and other AEDs from the TDM-database at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway. Clinical data regarding efficacy and tolerability were collected from medical records. The Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) was used to include population-based numbers of users. TDM-data from 344 patients were included. The median dose, serum concentration, and concentration/dose (C/D)-ratio of LCM was 350 (range 25-700) mg/day, 19.7 (range 8.1-56.2) µmol/L, and 0.06 (0.02-0.82) µmol/L/mg, respectively. Serum concentrations were reduced by 28% by concomitant use of enzyme inducers and increased by 30% in patients aged >65 years. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed in 227 patients: 29% had >50% seizure reduction (eight seizure free), 30% had no effect, and 44% reported adverse effects. In Norway, there were on average 500 patients per year using LCM in this period based on NorPD. The study demonstrated pharmacokinetic variability and use of TDM of LCM in Norway. Data were collected from multiple sources for improved pharmacovigilance. Serum concentrations were influenced by enzyme inducers and ageing, indicating the usefulness of TDM. Effect and tolerability were favorable within a suggested reference range of 10-40 µmol/L given drug-fasting conditions.

The Impact of Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Eslicarbazepine Acetate Versus Oxcarbazepine and Carbamazepine in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new anti-epileptic drug (AED) chemically related to oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) and is increasingly used in clinical practice. The purpose of the study was to investigate 2-way pharmacokinetic interactions between ESL and other AEDs as compared to OXC and CBZ. METHODS: Anonymous data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses and serum concentration measurements of ESL, OXC, CBZ and lamotrigine (LTG) and other AEDs were retrieved from 2 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) databases in Norway. Drugs were categorized according to their known potential for interactions. Concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Data from 1100 patients were available. The C/D ratios of ESL and OXC were unchanged in combination with enzyme-inducing AEDs or valproate (VPA). The C/D ratio of CBZ decreased by 40% and 22% in combination with other enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA, respectively, pointing to an increased clearance. ESL demonstrated no significant enzyme-inducing effect on LTG metabolism although there was a 20% and 34% decrease in the C/D ratio of LTG in combination with OXC and CBZ, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Possible pharmacokinetic interactions have been studied for ESL as compared to OXC and CBZ. The pharmacokinetics of ESL is not affected by enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA and does not affect the metabolism of LTG in contrast to OXC and CBZ. The study demonstrates the value of using TDM databases to explore the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions of new AEDs.

Changes in utilisation of antiepileptic drugs in epilepsy and non-epilepsy disorders-a pharmacoepidemiological study and clinical implications.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in utilisation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in epilepsy and non-epilepsy disorders in Norway and furthermore to study the retention rates of the most commonly used AEDs in these indications in long-term use. METHODS: The data consisted of all prescriptions of AEDs from Norwegian pharmacies in the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) (2004-2012). Variables included anonymous data regarding age, gender, diagnosis specific reimbursement codes and utilisation of AEDs. RESULTS: In recent years (2008-2012), the utilisation of AEDs in non-epilepsy disorders accounted for 45-53 % of the total use. In epilepsy, the most commonly used AED was lamotrigine, followed by levetiracetam, carbamazepine and valproate. Lamotrigine was also the predominant AED used in psychiatry, while pregabalin and gabapentin were mostly used in neuropathic pain. In migraine, topiramate predominated but accounted for <1 % of the total utilisation of AEDs. The majority of prescriptions were by general practitioners and only 20 % by specialists. Regardless of indication, newer AEDs had higher retention rates (34-48 %) and were used for a longer period before discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AEDs in non-epilepsy disorders is increasing and accounted for 53 % in 2012. Newer AEDs were predominantly used and demonstrated higher retention rates than older AEDs in all indications. This nationwide study demonstrates an increased exposure to AEDs in new patient groups, and details in prescription patterns and clinical and safety considerations should be closely monitored. This contributes to long-term post-marketing data of AED and accordingly improved pharmacovigilance.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Clobazam and Its Metabolite-Impact of Age and Comedication on Pharmacokinetic Variability.

BACKGROUND: Clobazam (CLB) has been used as an antiepileptic drug for several decades. There is still insufficient data regarding its pharmacokinetic variability in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of CLB with emphasis on the impact of age and comedication in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Serum concentration measurements of CLB and its metabolite N-desmethylclobazam (NCLB), as well as demographic and clinical data were retrieved from the routine therapeutic drug monitoring service at the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway, 2009-2013. NCLB/CLB and total (CLB + NCLB), CLB and NCLB concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were calculated. RESULTS: 550 patients (296 women/254 men), average age 27 years (range 1-86), were included. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was extensive, as illustrated by a 100-fold variability in serum concentration compared with dose (total C/D ratio 0.03-3.29 µmol·L·mg). The CLB C/D ratio was 36% lower in young children (2-9 years) than in adults (18-64 years), reflecting a higher clearance. In patients receiving phenytoin, felbamate, stiripentol, oxcarbazepine or eslicarbazepine acetate, valproate, phenobarbital, zonisamide or carbamazepine one or more of the calculated ratios were significantly different from that in patients receiving no or neutral comedications. The mean values for the different groups were in the order of 20%-230% of C/D ratios in the neutral group and 200%-950% of the NCLB/CLB ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic variability of CLB and its metabolite NCLB in clinical practice is extensive, and is influenced by drug-drug interactions, age, and pharmacogenetics. Therapeutic drug monitoring of CLB and NCLB is therefore valuable in patient management.

Availability of antiepileptic drugs across Europe.

Europe consists of 53 countries with widely different economic conditions and different political, educational, and health care systems. This study was aimed at determining the availability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) across Europe. An electronic questionnaire was submitted to all 43 European chapters of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). Outcome measures were availability of older, newer, and newest AEDs, generic products, indications, reimbursement rules, and reasons for lack of availability of AEDs. Countries were divided according to economic status as defined by the World Bank. Thirty-four chapters (79%) provided data. There were large differences in AED availability across countries, especially between high-income countries and the other countries. The newest AEDs were not available in any of the 12 non-high-income countries. Availability was higher in countries with public reimbursement systems. Reimbursement policies ranged from full reimbursement for all AEDs to complete lack of reimbursement. Main hurdles for poor access to AEDs included lack of regulatory approval, high prices and reimbursement restrictions. The availability of AEDs differs across European countries, with many hurdles hampering access to epilepsy medicines, particularly to new medications. These findings raise major concerns on the quality of epilepsy care in many countries.

Experience from therapeutic drug monitoring and gender aspects of gabapentin and pregabalin in clinical practice.

PURPOSE: Gabapentin and pregabalin are antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with epilepsy and neuropathic pain indications. The purpose of this study was to investigate pharmacokinetic variability of gabapentin and pregabalin and indications for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice with focus on gender aspects. METHOD: Anonymous data from routine TDM-service at the National Center for Epilepsy regarding serum concentration measurements of gabapentin and pregabalin, 2009-2013, were utilised. All included samples were drug-fasting in the morning at steady-state. RESULTS: In total, 356 patients were included; gabapentin 189 (66% women), average age 53 years and pregabalin 167 (56% women), average age 50 years. For gabapentin, mean serum concentration/dose(C/D)-ratio was similar across genders. Only 13% of the patients had concentrations above the lower limit of the reference range (70-120 µmol/L), which indicates a need for reevaluation of the reference range. For pregabalin, the C/D-ratio in women (0.08±0.06) was 42% higher than in men (0.056±0.05; p<0.05). The pharmacokinetic variability (C/D-ratio) was >100-fold for both gabapentin and pregabalin. An indication of use (epilepsy/pain/other) was stated in only 26% of the cases (n=94). Epilepsy was assumed as indication when other AEDs were also measured (50% of patients). This was similar for both genders and for both AEDs. Indications for TDM were stated in 155 cases (44%) and were similar for gabapentin and pregabalin. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin and pregabalin are more used in women than in men, and routine use of TDM is most common in patients with epilepsy. Pharmacokinetic variability is extensive, highlighting a need for individualisation of therapy regardless of indication.

Pharmacokinetic variability of four newer antiepileptic drugs, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate: a comparison of the impact of age and comedication.

BACKGROUND: Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used in patients with epilepsy. There is still insufficient documentation regarding pharmacokinetic variability of these AEDs in different patient groups. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare age and comedication as factors contributing to pharmacokinetic variability between 4 newer AEDs (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate) among patients with refractory epilepsy. METHODS: Data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses, and serum concentration measurements were retrieved from a therapeutic drug monitoring database, from patients admitted to the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway, 2007-2008. RESULTS: In total, 1050 patients were included, 111 younger children (2-9 years), 137 older children (10-17 years), 720 adults (18-64 years), 82 elderly (65-93 years). Fifty percent of the patients were prescribed polytherapy, in 88 different combinations. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was extensive, as illustrated by a 10-fold variability in serum concentration compared with dose. Age affected the apparent clearance of levetiracetam to the largest extent, as shown by a 60% increase in younger children and a 40% reduction in the elderly, respectively, compared with adults. Comedication altered the clearance of lamotrigine to the greatest extent ±70% because it is affected by both enzyme inducers and inhibitors. Hepatic enzyme inducers increased the clearance of levetiracetam and topiramate by 25% and oxcarbazepine by 75%. Valproic acid reduced the clearance of topiramate by 25%. CONCLUSION: Age and comedication are important contributors to pharmacokinetic variability. Age had the greatest impact on levetiracetam, and comedication affected the clearance of each of the 4 AEDs investigated in this study. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions must be carefully considered when multidrug therapies are prescribed. Therapeutic drug monitoring is a valuable tool for individualizing AED therapy.