Natural orifice specimen extraction versus transabdominal extraction in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La extracción de muestras de orificio natural (NOSE) para resecciones colorrectales, que mejoran aún más las ventajas de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva, se utilizan cada vez con mayor frecuencia. En este estudio, nuestro objetivo fue comparar los métodos de extracción de muestras de nariz y transabdominales en casos de resecciones de colon derecho totalmente laparoscópicas. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron datos de 52 pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía laparoscópica de colon derecho entre 2013 y 2019. La extracción de muestras transabdominales se realizó en 35 pacientes, mientras que 17 pacientes fueron sometidos a NOSE. Se compararon datos demográficos, hallazgos operativos, resultados patológicos y datos de seguimiento. RESULTADOS: Las mujeres (94% frente a 28%, p = 0,0001), comórbidas (76% frente a 40%, p = 0,01) y antecedentes de cirugía abdominal previa (75% frente a 23%, p = 0,001) fueron más altas en el grupo NOSE . Todas las otras características preoperatorias de los grupos fueron comparables. La pérdida de sangre intraoperatoria, el tiempo de operación y las tasas de complicaciones fueron similares en ambos grupos. La escala VAS postoperatoria (2.8 ± 1.2 vs. 4.5 ± 2.4, p = 0.001) y los puntajes cosméticos fueron mejores en el grupo NOSE (10 vs. 7, p = 0.0001). Los resultados oncológicos fueron similares después de un seguimiento medio de 27.4 ± 20.5 (1-77) meses. CONCLUSIÓN: El método NOSE después de la resección laparoscópica del colon derecho fue un método más ventajoso en términos de cosméticos y dolor postoperatorio que la extracción de muestras transabdominales. INTRODUCTION: Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for colorectal resections, which further enhance the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, are being used increasingly more often. In this study, we aimed to compare NOSE and transabdominal specimen extraction methods in cases of totally laparoscopic right colon resections. METHODS: Data of 52 patients who underwent laparoscopic right colon surgery between 2013 and 2019 were included in the study. Transabdominal specimen removal was done in 35 patients, while 17 patients underwent NOSE. Demographic data, operative findings, pathological results, and follow-up data were compared. RESULTS: Female (94% vs. 28%, p = 0.0001), co-morbid (76% vs. 40%, p = 0.01), and previous abdominal surgery history (75% vs. 23%, p = 0.001) were higher in the NOSE group. All the other pre-operative features of the groups were comparable. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and complication rates were similar in both groups. Post-operative visual analog scale (2.8 ± 1.2 vs. 4.5 ± 2.4, p = 0.001) and cosmetic scores were better in the NOSE group (10 vs. 7, p = 0.0001). Oncologic results were similar after a mean follow-up of 27.4 ± 20.5 (1-77) months. CONCLUSION: The NOSE method following laparoscopic right colon resection was a more advantageous method in terms of cosmetics and post-operative pain than transabdominal specimen extraction.

Isolated cecal necrosis: our surgical experience and a review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Isolated cecal necrosis is a rare cause of ischemic colitis. Ischemic colitis is further divided into two groups: occlusive mesenteric ischemia and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the cause of isolated cecal necrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We operated on 3 male and 3 female patients with a mean age of 60.3±18.7 (38-85) years with a preliminary diagnosis of acute appendicitis between 2007 and 2012. Four of these patients were on hemodialysis, 1 patient had an aortofemoral bypass, and 1 patient had coronary artery disease with atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: The diagnosis was made intraoperatively in all cases. Five patients died postoperatively. One patient survived. CONCLUSION: In the case of right lower quadrant pain, the possibility of isolated cecal necrosis should be kept in mind, especially in patients on hemodialysis, elderly patients with diabetes, and heart disease; surgical strategies should be planned accordingly, and it should be understood that a high mortality rate will be inevitable.