DPD-based adaptive dosing of 5-FU in patients with head and neck cancer: impact on treatment efficacy and toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidine drugs are widely used in head and neck cancer (HNC). DPD deficiency is a pharmacogenetics syndrome associated with severe/lethal toxicities upon 5-FU or capecitabine intake. We have developed a simple, rapid, and inexpensive functional testing for DPD activity, as a means to identify deficient patients and to anticipate subsequent 5-FU-related toxicities. We present here the impact of fluoropyrimidine dose tailoring based on DPD functional screening in a prospective, open, non-controlled study, both in term of reduction in severe toxicities and of treatment efficacy. METHODS: About 65 patients with HNC (59 ± 9 years, 52M/13F, Prospective Group) were entered into the study. Screening for DPD deficiency was performed prior to the beginning of the chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy. DPD status was evaluated by monitoring U/UH2 ratio levels in plasma as a surrogate marker for enzymatic functionality. 5-FU doses were reduced according to the extent of the detected DPD impairment, and adjusted on the basis of age, general condition, and other clinical/paraclinical covariates, if required. Treatment-related toxicities and subsequent impact on treatment delay were carefully monitored next for comparison with a retrospective, Reference subset of 74 other patients with HNC (mean age: 59 ± 10, 58M/16F, Reference Group), previously treated in the same institute with similar schedule but using standard 5-FU dosage. RESULTS: Thirty-one out of 65 patients (48%) were identified as mildly (28%) to markedly (20%) DPD deficient. Subsequently, dose reductions ranging from 10 to 100% with 5-FU were applied in those patients. In this group, six patients (9%) experienced severe toxicities, none of them being life threatening, and no toxic death was encountered. In comparison, 16 out of 74 patients (22%) of the Reference Group displayed severe side effects after standard 5-FU administration, 13% being life-threatening toxicities (e.g., G4 neutropenia + sepsis). Moreover, one toxic death was observed in this Reference Group. No postponement or cancelation of forthcoming chemoradiotherapy courses occurred in the Prospective Group, whereas treatment had to be disrupted in six patients (8%) from the Reference Group. No difference in first-line therapy efficacy was evidenced between the two subsets (78 vs. 79% response, P = 0.790). CONCLUSIONS: Although non-randomized, this study strongly suggests that prospective determination of DPD status has an immediate clinical benefit by reducing the drug-induced toxicities incidence in patients treated with 5-FU, allowing an optimal administration of several courses in a row, while maintaining efficacy. Our preliminary results thus advocate for systematic DPD screening in patients eligible for treatment with fluoropyrimidine drugs in HNC.

High-dose methotrexate in adults with osteosarcoma: a population pharmacokinetics study and validation of a new limited sampling strategy.

Preoperative high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) with folinic acid (leucovorin) rescue is still a mainstay in the treatment of osteosarcoma. This anticancer agent is characterized by a narrow therapeutic index and wide interpatients variability. To ensure effective and safe administration of HD-MTX, we had earlier developed an adaptive-dosing schedule with a feedback strategy. In our institute, the MTX dosage was tailored according to individual pharmacokinetics parameters, determined in real time both from two blood samples (3.5 and 4.5 h) and from Bayesian population parameters. Up to 20 g of MTX was safely administered as 8-h infusions. Low MTX elimination rate has, however, been reported in 15-20% of the patients, and forecasting the MTX elimination phase and the management of leucovorin rescue is still a challenging issue in clinical oncology. This study aims at identifying the clinical or biological covariates related to impaired MTX clearance, and at validating a new limited sampling strategy (LSS), allowing for the accurate prediction of the MTX terminal elimination phase. This retrospective study was carried out on 49 patients (30 men, 19 women; mean age, 26.7 years) treated for osteosarcoma with HD-MTX. The population and individual pharmacokinetics parameters were computed, before the identification of the relevant covariates. Different LSSs were then tested, to predict accurately when the MTX plasma concentrations would drop below 0.2 micromol/l, the threshold associated with the end of the rescue of leucovorin with alkaline hydration. Two main covariates (creatinemia clearance and alanine aminotransferase) were correlated with MTX clearance. Conversely, the impact of body surface area on MTX pharmacokinetics was weak, suggesting that dosing schedules based on body surface area were inadequate and potentially hazardous. A new LSS predicting accurately when the MTX concentration would reach 0.2 micromol/l has been validated; blood samples are stopped as soon as the MTX concentration drops to 1 micromol/l. With this LSS, our retrospective study suggests that 60% of the patients would have left the hospital earlier than they actually did owing to a better forecasting of the MTX decrease, thus improving their quality of life while improving the cost-effectiveness for the institute. HD-MTX can be administered safely using an adaptive-dosing strategy with drug monitoring. Moreover, pharmacokinetic modeling permits the accurate forecasting of the MTX elimination profile, thus allowing for a better management of the postinfusion care of cancer patients treated with particularly high doses of this drug.

Dose individualization of carboplatin after a 120-hour infusion schedule: higher dose intensity but fewer toxicities.

Carboplatin (CBDCA) is a widely used anticancer agent for which dose-effect and dose-toxicity relationships have been demonstrated, thus stressing the need for a controlled exposure to this drug. So far, carboplatin administration could only be individualized a priori following 2 classic methods, which are based on the evaluation of renal clearance: Calvert's and Chatelut's formulas. This study was designed to develop and evaluate the performance of an alternative CBDCA 120-hour schedule coupled to a Bayesian adaptive dosing with feedback strategy. Precision of the dosing method was assessed in 84 patients (256 courses performed during a 10-year period), by comparing CBDCA plasma concentrations observed at the end of the infusion with initial target values. A comprehensive monitoring of treatment-related toxicities also was performed. Finally, the authors compared doses actually delivered following the dose-tailoring method with the theoretical, standard, ones calculated retrospectively with Calvert's and Chatelut's formulas. No significant differences were found between experimental and theoretical concentrations. According to the target exposure chosen (3 levels), the mean doses administered to our patients were 517, 719, and 902 mg of CBDCA compared with 550, 509, and 538 or 657, 604, and 644 mg, which would have been given following Calvert or Chatelut formulas, respectively. These results showed that our Bayesian method led to the administration of up to 60% higher doses of carboplatin compared with those based only on the evaluation of renal clearance. Despite the markedly higher doses administered, no severe toxicities were reported in the patients treated following this new schedule. It is noteworthy that neither hematologic growth factors nor stem cells, usually associated with high-dose regimen, were used as support in this study. These data strongly suggest that it is possible to deliver higher dose- intensities of carboplatin, even in elderly, unselected patients, without increasing toxicities and with no growth factor support, provided that a therapeutic drug monitoring strategy with real-time tailored dosing is performed.