Laboratory classification categories and pregnancy outcome in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome prescribed antithrombotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: A relationship between antibody profile and pregnancy outcome in patients with a previous diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has not been clearly documented. METHODS: Women attending our Center with primary APS characterized by the presence in the blood of one or more of the following: Lupus Anticoagulant (LA), IgG/IgM anticardiolipin (aCL), IgG/IgM anti-human beta2-Glycoprotein I (abeta2GPI) antibodies (confirmed after a minimum of 3 months) were considered eligible for this study. Women who became pregnant during the study period with the exception of those with congenital thrombophilia or other congenital abnormalities were included in our analysis. Primary outcome events, defined as early abortion or fetal death, were evaluated in relation to the laboratory classification category assigned to each patient at the time they were diagnosed with APS. RESULTS: A total of 97 pregnancies occurring in 79 primary APS patients during the study period were analyzed. Twelve out of 97 pregnancies were unsuccessful, 11 out of 65 (16.9%) in category I patients (more than one positive laboratory test) and 1 out of 32 (3.1%) in category II patients (single positive test; adjusted hazard ratio 1.9; 95% CI, 0.2 to 18.9, p=0.6). Pregnancy loss took place in 10 out of 19 pregnancies (52.6%) in women belonging to category I with triple positivity and in 1 out of 46 pregnancies (2.2%) in patients with double positivity. The rate of pregnancy loss was more frequent in the 19 pregnancies of patients with triple positivity than in the 46 pregnancies of double positive patients (adjusted hazard ratio 23, 95% CI, 1.3 to 408, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Poor pregnancy outcomes occur more frequently in category I than in category II primary APS patients. However, it has been seen that a greater predictability is achieved when category I patients are grouped into triple and double positivity states.

The Italian SIdEM registry for apheresis: an overview of the 2005 statistics.

Data collection on apheresis activities in Italy throughout 2005 including techniques, types of blood cell separators, clinical indications and adverse effects was performed by means of a standardized questionnaire. These data provided by 83 Apheresis Units from 16 Italian regions, albeit rough, are sufficiently informative, mainly in comparison with previous surveys on these statistics (1997 and 2000). In 2005 a total number of 204,746 apheresis procedures were carried out, with a clear-cut prevalence of apheresis production (87.7%), performed by 66 out of 83 Apheresis Units (79.5). Lombardy, Veneto and Tuscany were the most active regions for therapeutic apheresis (51.1% of the total national procedures). An increasing number in extracorporeal photochemotherapy as compared to the 2000 national survey (3,386 vs. 704 procedures) is the most striking observation to emerge from the 2005 data collection on therapeutic apheresis in Italy. Adverse effects, predominantly mild ones (i.e., paresthesia due to citrate-induced hypocalcemia), occurred in 0.12% of apheresis production and 6.04 of therapeutic sessions, particularly in the course of peripheral blood stem cell collection (20.79%), as already reported in the 2000 national survey.

Three months versus one year of oral anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. Warfarin Optimal Duration Italian Trial Investigators.

BACKGROUND: In patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis, continuing anticoagulant therapy beyond three months is associated with a reduced incidence of recurrent thrombosis during the period of therapy. Whether this benefit persists after anticoagulant therapy is discontinued is controversial. METHODS: Patients with a first episode of idiopathic proximal deep venous thrombosis who had completed three months of oral anticoagulant therapy (with warfarin, in 97 percent of the cases and acenocoumarol in 3 percent) were randomly assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulants or to their continuation for nine additional months. The primary study outcome was recurrence of symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism during at least two years of follow-up. RESULTS: The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed that of 134 patients assigned to continued oral anticoagulant therapy, 21 had a recurrence of venous thromboembolism (15.7 percent; average follow-up, 37.8 months), as compared with 21 of 133 patients assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy (15.8 percent; average follow-up, 37.2 months), resulting in a relative risk of 0.99 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 1.73). During the initial nine months after randomization (after all patients received three months of therapy), 1 patient had a recurrence while receiving oral anticoagulant therapy (0.7 percent), as compared with 11 of the patients assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy (8.3 percent; P=0.003). The incidence of recurrence after the discontinuation of treatment was 5.1 percent per patient-year in patients in whom oral anticoagulant therapy was discontinued after 3 months (95 percent confidence interval, 3.2 to 7.5 percent; average interval since discontinuation, 37.2 months) and 5.0 percent per patient-year in patients who received an additional 9 months of oral anticoagulant therapy (95 percent confidence interval, 3.1 to 7.8 percent; average interval since discontinuation, 29.4 months). None of the recurrences were fatal. Four patients had non-fatal major bleeding during the extended period of anticoagulant therapy (3.0 percent). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis, the clinical benefit associated with extending the duration of anticoagulant therapy to one year is not maintained after the therapy is discontinued.

The optimal treatment of venous thrombosis: current status and future perspectives.

Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities is a serious and potentially fatal disorder, which often complicates the course of hospitalized patients but may also affect ambulatory and otherwise healthy people. Venous thrombosis is uncommon in young individuals and becomes more frequent with advancing age. The clinically important problems associated with venous thrombosis are death from pulmonary embolism, morbidity resulting from the acute event, recurrent venous thromboembolic events, the post-thrombotic syndrome, and the inconvenience and side-effects of investigations and treatment. The main objectives of treatment of DVT are prevention of (both fatal and nonfatal) pulmonary embolism and thrombus extension in the acute phase of the disease, prevention of recurrences of venous thromboembolism in the months following the acute episode, and prevention of late sequelae (post-thrombotic syndrome). These objectives are satisfactorily achieved with anticoagulant drugs (heparin and vitamin K antagonists), which therefore are the mainstays of DVT treatment. Other therapeutic options have a more limited application.

Postthrombotic syndrome: incidence, prevention, and management.

Mild to severe postthrombotic sequelae, including chronic pain, edema, and ulceration, arise in one third of patients short after deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Recurrent DVT is closely associated with the development of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), whereas if the extent and location of DVT might be relevant remains unclear. Chronic venous hypertension and abnormal microvessel or lymphatic function also correlates with PTS. The diagnosis of PTS is based on clinical grounds only if patients report a history of documented DVT; otherwise, objective testing is required. To abate the prevalence of PTS, the best policy is represented by prevention of recurrent thrombosis and use of stockings. Despite a plenty of surgical options, conservative treatment is preferable because half of the patients improve or remain stable during follow-up, provided they wear elastic stockings. Clinical presentation has a prognostic value, as patients with initially severe symptoms enjoy a more favorable outcome than those who progressively deteriorate over time.

Anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies in patients with acute venous thromboembolism: prevalence and association with recurrent thromboembolism.

To establish the prevalence of antibodies against beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) in unselected patients with venous thromboembolism, as well as the association with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and a history of previous thromboembolism, we investigated the presence of these antibodies in 227 consecutive patients with acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, of whom 63 were carriers of aPL with or without lupus anticoagulant (LA), and seven were carriers of LA alone. The presence of antibodies against beta2GPI was demonstrated in 19 patients [8.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.5-11.3%]. All of them belonged to the group of 63 patients with aPL (30.2%). A history of a previous thromboembolism was identified in 11 of the 19 patients with anti-beta2GPI antibodies (57.9%) and in 45 of the 208 patients without these antibodies [21.6%; odds ratio (OR)=4.98; 95% CI, 1.89-13.1; p<0.0005]. In the subgroup of patients with aPL and/or LA, the rate of recurrent thromboembolism among patients with anti-beta2GPI antibodies (11 of 19, 57.9%) was significantly higher than that observed in patients without these antibodies (15 of 51, 29.4%; OR=3.3; 95% CI, 1.1-9.83; p=0.28). We conclude that in patients with acute venous thromboembolism the prevalence of antibodies against beta2GPI is unexpectedly high. The presence of these antibodies seems to identify a subgroup of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies who have a peculiarly high risk of thrombotic recurrences. Further prospective studies are indicated to better define the role of anti-beta2GPI antibodies in the development of recurrent thromboembolism.

Local versus central assessment of venographies in a multicenter trial on the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in neurosurgery.

Venography is the diagnostic method of choice for end-point measurement in multicenter trials on the prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The aim of the study was to determine the inter-observer agreement between the local and central assessment of venographies in a multicenter trial comparing enoxaparin and placebo in the prevention of DVT after elective neurosurgery. The study was run in seven centers experienced in venography trials on DVT prevention. The central and local adjudication panels were both blind with respect to the assigned treatment. The central panel was unaware of the local adjudication. Venographies were adjudicated as positive, negative or inadequate for adjudication and positive venographies as proximal or distal DVT. Inter-observer agreement was assessed according to the Cohen's inter-observer variability index (K index). All 266 venographies (8 monolateral) were considered adequate for adjudication by both the central and local panels. A disagreement was found in 25 cases; K index = 0.75. Fourteen venographies adjudicated as negative centrally were considered positive locally (3 were proximal DVT). Eleven venographies adjudicated as positive centrally (1 was a proximal DVT) were considered negative locally. Enoxaparin was found to be more effective than placebo according to both the central and local adjudication: 16.9% versus 32.6% (Relative risk, RR = 0.52; CI 95% 0.33-0.82) according to central adjudication; 18.5% versus 33.3% (RR = 0.56; CI 95% 0.36-0.87) according to local adjudication. We conclude that a good inter-observer agreement in the assessment of venography was observed between the central and local adjudication in a study on DVT prevention run in a restricted experienced study framework. The cost and work overloading of central assessment of venographies in this study framework seems not to be justified.

Venous thromboses of upper limbs are more frequently associated with occult cancer as compared with those of lower limbs.

Three hundred and forty-three consecutive patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were investigated for the possible presence of occult or undiagnosed cancer, of whom 305 patients had DVT of the lower limbs whereas 38 had DVT of the upper limbs. Cancer was diagnosed during a 12-month follow-up in nine patients with DVT of the upper limbs (23.7%) and in 34 patients with DVT of the lower limbs (11.1%). The difference was statistically significant. Furthermore, it was shown that the majority of cancers (seven of nine) in the case of DVT of the upper limbs were discovered during the first week of hospital admission. In contrast, in the case of DVT of lower limbs, only eight of 34 cancers were discovered during the initial investigation. Lung cancer and lymphomas represented the majority of cancers associated with upper limb venous thrombosis (seven of nine). In the case of DVT of the lower limbs, cancers were heterogeneous; however, 12 of 34 were cancers of the colon or prostate.

Use of an algorithm for administering subcutaneous heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis, there are no guidelines for achieving adequate anticoagulation with this drug. OBJECTIVE: To implement a weight-based algorithm for the administration of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin after an intravenous loading dose. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 70 outpatients with proximal venous thrombosis. INTERVENTION: An intravenous bolus of heparin followed by a subcutaneous injection of heparin in doses adjusted for body weight. Subsequent adjustments of the subcutaneous heparin dose were scheduled twice daily according to the algorithm; the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was measured in the mid-interval (target range, 50 to 90 seconds). RESULTS: The therapeutic threshold aPTT (> or = 50 seconds) was achieved in 61 patients (87%) within 24 hours and in 69 patients (99%) within 48 hours. In 7 patients (10%), a supratherapeutic aPTT lasted more than 12 hours. No major bleeding episodes or cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were seen. Three patients (4.3% [95% CI, 0.9% to 12.0%]) had recurrent thromboembolism during 3 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The administration of subcutaneous heparin according to a weight-based algorithm allows the rapid achievement of effective and safe anticoagulation in patients with deep venous thrombosis.

The clinical course of deep-vein thrombosis. Prospective long-term follow-up of 528 symptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In contrast to the extensive documentation on the short-term outcome of patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities, little is known about the long-term clinical course of this disease. To determine the clinical course of patients with a first episode of symptomatic DVTn over an 8-year follow-up period. The primary aims were to assess the long-term incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and that of the post-thrombotic syndrome. In addition, we determined mortality and evaluated potential risk factors for all these outcomes. METHODS: This was designed as a prospective cohort follow-up study. Consecutive symptomatic outpatients with a first episode of venography proven DVT were treated with an initial course of full-dose (low molecular weight) heparin, followed by at least three months of oral anticoagulants. After discharge, they were instructed to wear compression elastic stockings for at least two years. Follow-up assessments were scheduled at three and six months, and then every six months up to eight years. Diagnosis of recurrent venous thromboembolism was made according to standard criteria. The presence of post-thrombotic syndrome was evaluated using a standardized scale. RESULTS: A total of 528 consecutive patients with a first episode of venography confirmed DVT were included in the study. The cumulative incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism after two, five and eight years was 17.2, 24.3 and 29.7%, respectively. Malignancy and impaired coagulation inhibition increased the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (RR = 1.48 and 2.0, respectively). In contrast, surgery and recent trauma or fracture were associated with a diminished risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (RR = 0.65 and 0.39, respectively). The cumulative incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome after two, five and eight years was 24.5, 29.6 and 29.8%, respectively. The development of ipsilateral recurrent DVT was strongly associated with the risk for post-thrombotic syndrome (risk ratio, 2.4). Survival after eight years was 69%. The presence of malignancy increased the risk of death remarkably (risk ratio, 7.1). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic DVT carries a high risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism that persists for many years, especially in patients without transient risk factors for DVT. The post-thrombotic syndrome occurs in almost one-third of patients and is strongly related to recurrent ipsilateral DVT. Our findings challenge the widely adopted short course of anticoagulation in patients with symptomatic DVT.

The utility of non-invasive tests for detection of previous proximal-vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of several diagnostic methods for the detection of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), the identification of previous episodes of DVT remains a diagnostic challenge. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of a combination of a standardized clinical score with three non-invasive tests: compression ultrasonography (CUS), Doppler ultrasound (DUS), and photoplethysmography (PPG), in determining the presence or the absence of previous proximal DVT. METHODS: One hundred consecutive unselected outpatients were identified, who had undergone contrast venography six to nine years previously because of the clinical suspicion of DVT (confirmed in 43). They were blindly reinvestigated by a panel of trained operators unaware of venography results. They underwent a clinical evaluation of the lower limb, by applying a standardized score to five symptoms and six signs (grading each item from 0 to 3); a PPG test to determine the venous refilling time; a DUS test to determine the venous reflux separately in the common femoral and the popliteal vein; and a CUS test to determine vein compressibility in the same regions. RESULTS: An abnormal CUS test and/or the demonstration of venous reflux in the popliteal region and/or a high clinical score (> or = 8) identified twenty-four of the 43 (56%) DVT + patients with a specificity of 89%. The combination of normal CUS with the absence of venous reflux in both the common femoral and popliteal vein and a low clinical score excluded previous thrombosis in 45 (79%) of the 57 DVT-patients (negative predictive value, 78%). Abnormal venous reflux in the isolated common femoral vein did not reliably predict the presence or absence of previous DVT. However, this occurred in only 13 (13%) patients. The PPG determination of venous refilling time did not improve the results obtained with the other tests. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a standardized clinical evaluation with the results of CUS and DUS can reliably diagnose or exclude previous proximal-vein thrombosis in almost 90% of patients with previous episodes of suspected DVT.