ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Uncertainty is a fundamental component of decision making regarding access to and pricing and reimbursement of drugs. The context-specific interpretation and mitigation of uncertainty remain major challenges for decision makers. Following the 2021 HTAi Global Policy Forum, a cross-sectoral, interdisciplinary HTAi-DIA Working Group (WG) was initiated to develop guidance to support stakeholder deliberation on the systematic identification and mitigation of uncertainties in the regulatory-HTA interface. METHODS: Six online discussions among WG members (Dec 2021-Sep 2022) who examined the output of a scoping review, two literature-based case studies and a survey; application of the initial guidance to a real-world case study; and two international conference panel discussions. RESULTS: The WG identified key concepts, clustered into twelve building blocks that were collectively perceived to define uncertainty: "unavailable," "inaccurate," "conflicting," "not understandable," "random variation," "information," "prediction," "impact," "risk," "relevance," "context," and "judgment." These were converted into a checklist to explain and define whether any issue constitutes a decision-relevant uncertainty. A taxonomy of domains in which uncertainty may exist within the regulatory-HTA interface was developed to facilitate categorization. The real-world case study was used to demonstrate how the guidance may facilitate deliberation between stakeholders and where additional guidance development may be needed. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic approach taken for the identification of uncertainties in this guidance has the potential to facilitate understanding of uncertainty and its management across different stakeholders involved in drug development and evaluation. This can improve consistency and transparency throughout decision processes. To further support uncertainty management, linkage to suitable mitigation strategies is necessary.
Subject(s)
Policy Making , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Uncertainty , Policy , Costs and Cost AnalysisABSTRACT
Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are a potentially curative new therapeutic option, but access challenges remain. The limited number of certified treatment centers and the need to travel to these centers, the expenses of travel and lodging and the out-of-pocket costs associated with treatment pose a challenge for patients. Further, the logistics of follow-up coupled with an ad hoc reimbursement environment make chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment an unattractive proposition for many providers. The patient-specific nature of these gene therapies has made scaling up production difficult for manufacturers. Providing expanded financial assistance for patients and education for community oncologists, and addressing reimbursement challenges, can alleviate some of these access barriers.
Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are a new type of cancer treatment where the cells from a patient's own blood are changed in the laboratory and injected back into the patient so they attack cancer cells. While these drugs offer a possible cure for some cancers, patients have had problems getting these treatments because there are not many approved treatment centers. Patients have to travel to these centers, and there can be high out-of-pocket costs for travel, a place to stay and the treatment itself. The paper discusses several ways to make it easier to get these treatments, such as helping patients pay for lodging and travel and changing insurance payment policies for chimeric antigen receptor T cell treatment.
ABSTRACT
Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of optic neuropathies and is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) is a major subtype, prevalent mostly in east and south Asia, where occludable anterior chamber angle is considered as a primary risk factor, which in turn could be responsible for high intraocular pressure (IOP) and subsequent neurodegeneration of retinal ganglion cells. Clinically, IOP is considered as a major risk factor for glaucoma and viewed as an important endophenotype to promote the disease severity. To investigate the comprehensive genomic insights, we conducted a genomewide association study (GWAS) on IOP in individuals with occludable angle (<15 degrees), thus anatomically predisposed to PACG. After performing GWAS on IOP, we identified 25 genomewide suggestive significant loci (P<1e-05, n = 240) of which, six were in complete linkage disequilibrium with the ABCA4 genic region. We successfully replicated the most significant discovery, SNPs of ABCA4 (rs2065712) in a separate cohort of 89 individuals (P =1.16e-09). We identified multiple SNPs in ABCA4 to be associated with IOP. Also, we obtained genes harbouring significantly associated SNPs, included in relevant biological pathways that could potentially be involved in IOP variation and glaucomatous neurodegeneration.
