ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Animal models provide a deeper understanding about various complications and better demonstrate the effect of therapeutic approaches. One of the issues in the low back pain (LBP) model is the invasiveness of the procedure and it does not mimic actual disease conditions in humans. The purpose of the present study was to compare the ultrasound-guided (US-guided) percutaneous approach with the open-surgery method in the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced disc degeneration model for the first time to showcase the advantages of this recently developed, minimally invasive method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, eight male rabbits were divided into two groups (open-surgery and US-guided). Relevant discs were punctured by two approaches and TNF-α was injected into them. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to assess the disc height index (DHI) at all stages. Also morphological changes (annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus) were evaluated by assessing Pfirrmann grade and histological evaluation (Hematoxylin and Eosin). RESULTS: The findings indicated targeted discs became degenerated after six weeks. DHI in both groups was significantly reduced (P<0.0001), however the difference was not significant between the two groups. In the open-surgery group, osteophyte formation was seen at six and eighteen weeks after the puncture. Pfirrmann grading revealed significant differences between injured and adjacent uninjured discs (P<0.0001). The US-guided method indicated significantly fewer signs of degeneration after six (P=0.0110) and eighteen (P=0.0328) weeks. Histological scoring showed significantly lower degeneration in the US-guided group (P=0.0039). CONCLUSION: The US-guided method developed a milder grade condition and such a model better mimics the chronic characteristics of LBP and the procedure is more ethically accepted. Therefore, the US-guided method could be a merit approach for future research in this domain as a safe, practical and low-cost method.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Systematic studies indicate a growing number of clinical studies that use mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the treatment of cartilage lesions. The current experimental and preclinical study aims to comparatively evaluate the potential of MSCs from a variety of tissues for the treatment of cartilage defect in rabbit's knee which has not previously been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, MSCs isolated from bone marrow (BMMSCs), adipose (AMSCs), and ears (EMSCs) of rabbits and expanded under in vitro culture. The growth rate and differentiation ability of MSCs into chondrocyte and the formation of cartilage pellet were investigated by drawing the growth curve and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respectively. Then, the critical cartilage defect was created on the articular cartilage (AC) of the rabbit distal femur, and MSCs in collagen carrier were transplanted. The studied groups were as the control (only defect), sham (defect with scaffold), BMMSCs in the scaffold, EMSCs in the scaffold, and EMSCs in the scaffold with cartilage pellets. Histological and the gene expression analysis were performed following the transplantation. RESULTS: Based on our comparative in vitro investigation, AMSCs possessed the highest growth rate, as well as the lowest chondrogenic differentiation potential. In this context, MSCs of the ear showed a significantly higher growth rate and cartilage differentiation potential than those of bone marrow tissue (P<0.05). According to our in vivo assessments, BMMSC- and EMSC-seeded scaffolds efficiently improved the cartilage defect 4 weeks post-transplantation, while no improvement was observed in the group contained the cartilage pellets. CONCLUSION: It seems that the ear contains MSCs that promote cartilage regeneration as much as the conventional MSCs from the bone marrow. Considering a high proliferation rate and easy harvesting of MSCs of the ear, this finding could be of value for the regenerative medicine.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve repair with sufficient functional recovery is an important issue in reconstructive surgery. Stem cells have attracted extensive research interest in recent years. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the vein conduit technique, with and without the addition of mesenchymal stem cells in gap-less nerve injury repair in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 36 Wistar rats were randomly allocated to three groups: In the first group, nerve repair was performed with simple neurorrhaphy (control group), in the second group, nerve repair was done with vein conduit over site (vein conduit group) and in the third group, bone marrow stem cells were instilled into the vein conduit (stem cell group) after nerve repair with vein conduit over site. Six weeks after the intervention, the sciatic function index, electrophysiological study and histological examination were performed. RESULTS: All animals tolerated the surgical procedures and survived well. The sciatic function index and latency were significantly improved in the vein conduit (P = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively) and stem cell group (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively) compared with the control group. No significant difference was observed in sciatic function and latency between the vein conduit and stem-cell groups. Moreover, histological analysis showed no significant difference in regenerative density between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the meticulous microsurgical nerve repair, which was performed using the vein tubulization induced significantly better sciatic nerve regeneration. However, the addition of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell to vein conduit failed to promote any significant changes in regeneration outcome.
