Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
New Microbes New Infect ; 25: 52-57, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094031

ABSTRACT

Little is known about the toxin profiles, toxinotypes and variations of toxin Clostridioides difficile C (tcdC) in Iranian C. difficile isolates. A total of 818 stool specimens were obtained from outpatients (n = 45) and hospitalized patients (n = 773) in Tehran, Iran, from 2011 to 2017. The 44 C. difficile isolates were subjected to PCR of toxin C. difficile A (tcdA), toxin C. difficile B (tcdB), tcdA 3'-end deletion, toxinotyping and sequencing of the tcdC gene. Thirty-eight isolates (86.36%) were identified as tcdA and tcdB positive, and the remaining six isolates (13.63%) were nontoxigenic. All tcdA- and tcdB-positive isolates yielded an amplicon of 2535 bp by PCR for the tcdA 3' end. Fourteen (36.84%), seventeen (44.73%) and seven (18.43%) isolates belonged to wild-type, toxin C. difficile C subclone3 (tcdC-sc3) and tcdC-A genotype of tcdC, respectively. Thirty-one isolates (81.57%) belonged to toxinotype 0, and seven isolates (18.42%) were classified as toxinotype V. This study provides evidence for the circulation of historical and hypervirulent isolates in the healthcare and community settings. Furthermore, it was also demonstrated that the tcdC-A genotype and toxinotype V are not uncommon among Iranian C. difficile isolates.

2.
J Appl Microbiol ; 125(5): 1518-1525, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29957893

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Little is known about the resistance rate and susceptibility profile of Clostridium difficile isolates in Iran. Therefore, the aim of present study is to assess the rate of drug-resistant C. difficile. METHODS AND RESULTS: During a 6-year period, four hospitals submitted 735 stool specimens from patients suspected for C. difficile infections to the anaerobic bacteriology laboratory. The 46 C. difficile isolates were subjected to disc diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) Test Strips. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (VAN) while the highly resistant phenotypes of metronidazole (MTZ) (67·4%), moxifloxacin (78·3%), ciprofloxacin (69·5%) and tetracycline (82·6%) were observed. Of more concern, 67·3% of C. difficile isolates displayed multidrug-resistant phenotypes. More than half of the isolates (n = 27, 58·6%) were coresistant to ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin. The MIC90 of VAN was ≤2 mg l-1 , whereas this value for MTZ, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and tetracycline was higher than the resistance breakpoints. According to the comparison of interpretive categories for two tests, the categorical agreement was less than 90% for VAN, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. CONCLUSIONS: The disc diffusion method can be used to detect the isolates with reduced susceptibility to MTZ or moxifloxacin. The high rate of resistance to fluoroquinolones highlights the possibility of the emergence of hypervirulent strains in our settings. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study provides data regarding the high level of resistance against multiple antibiotics except VAN.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridioides difficile/pathogenicity , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Humans , Iran , Metronidazole/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Vancomycin/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...