Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 100(3): 420-426, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193807

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: For various reasons, pregnant women are occasionally exposed to ionizing radiation during radiology examinations. In these situations, it is essential to determine the radiation dose to the fetus and any associated risks. The present study attempts to calculate the mean dose for the fetus to estimate the possible cancer induction and cancer mortality risks resulting from maternal radiography exams. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The GATE Monte Carlo platform and a standard voxelized pregnant phantom were employed to calculate fetal radiation dose during maternal radiography exams. The data published in Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII were used to convert fetal dose to lifetime attributable risks (LARs) of cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality. RESULTS: The fetal doses and LARs of cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality for the radiographs of the chest and skull were negligible. The maximum LAR values for the lateral view of the abdomen in computed and digital radiography are 5598.29 and 2238.95 per 100,000 individuals, respectively. The computed radiography of the lateral view of the abdomen revealed the highest LAR of cancer-related mortality (2074.30 deaths for every 100,000 people). CONCLUSION: The radiation dose incurred by the fetus due to chest and skull radiographs was minimal and unlikely to cause any abnormalities in the fetus. The discernible elevation in the lifetime attributable risk associated with cancer incidence and mortality arising from lateral computed radiography examinations of the abdomen warrants careful consideration within the realm of maternal radiography examinations.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Radiation Dosage , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Risk Factors , Radiography , Fetus/diagnostic imaging
2.
Environ Manage ; 73(1): 144-161, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37902876

ABSTRACT

Based on analyzing the composing elements of the water governance regime in the Hirmand River Basin, Iran, this paper examines the factors that facilitate the emergence of Adaptive Governance in a Global South context. Although the literature provides valuable insights into the characteristics of a well-established Adaptive Governance regime in the context of the Global North, relatively little research has been conducted on Adaptive Governance's fostering factors in the states in the Global South. To address this gap, this study utilizes an analytical framework upon which the features of water governance regimes are assessed. A combination of primary and secondary qualitative data (survey research and document analysis) is used to evaluate the assessment framework, which aims to analyze the characteristics that enhance resilience to the imposed changes and disturbances in complex environmental and water systems. The analysis suggests that addressing scalar and sectoral tensions, well-functioning reflecting mechanisms, adaptable policies, and flexible financial mechanisms are vital requisites for the transition towards more adaptive forms of water governance. The results also propose that the formal water governance system in the region has felt the urgency to adapt to new circumstances; however, unlike cases from the Global North, it lacks the required agility to escape from the rigidity trap it finds itself in.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources , Rivers , Conservation of Natural Resources/methods , Iran , Water , Causality
3.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 10997, 2023 07 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37419981

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the synergistic effect of ultrasonication and antimicrobial action of antimicrobial peptide cecropin P1 on the inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a cylindrical ultrasonication system. The inactivation of E. coli at pH 7.4 was performed using: ultrasonication (14, 22, and 47 kHz), cecropin P1 (20 µg/mL), and a combination of both. We found the treatment at 22 kHz, 8W for 15 min of exposure and a combination of ultrasound at higher frequency (47 kHz, 8 W) and cecropin P1 for one minute of exposure were more efficient, reducing the cell density by six orders of magnitude, compared to individual treatments (ultrasound or cecropin P1 only). Dye leakage studies and transmission electron microscopy further validated these results. A continuous flow system was designed to demonstrate synergism of ultrasonication with antimicrobial peptide Cecropin P1 in the inactivation of E. coli; synergism was shown to be more at higher ultrasonication frequencies and power levels. Acoustic cavitation by ultrasonic treatment could drastically improve microbial deactivation by antimicrobial peptides cecropin P1 by increasing their ability for pore formation in cell membranes. A continuous ultrasonication and antimicrobial peptides system can lead to an energy-efficient and economical sterilization system for food safety applications.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants , Escherichia coli O157 , Ultrasonics , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Sterilization , Antimicrobial Peptides , Colony Count, Microbial , Food Microbiology
4.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 62(2): 269-277, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37129707

ABSTRACT

The objective of our study was to determine organ doses to estimate the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence related to chest tomography simulations for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning (RTTP) using patient-specific information. Patient data were used to calculate organ doses and effective dose. The effective dose (E) was calculated by two methods. First, to calculate effective dose in a standard phantom, the collected dosimetric parameters were used with the ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator and E was calculated by applying related correction factors. Second, using the scanner-derived Dose Length Product, LARs were computed using the US National Academy of Sciences (BEIR VII) model for age- and sex-specific risks at each exposure. DLP, CTDIvol, and scan length were 507 ± 143 mGy.cm, 11 ± 4 mGy, and 47 ± 7 cm, respectively. The effective dose was 10 ± 3 mSv using ImPACT patient dosimetry calculator software and 9 ± 2 mSv using the scanner-derived Dose Length Product. The LAR of cancer incidence for all cancers, all solid cancers and leukemia were 65 ± 29, 62 ± 27, 7 ± 2 cases per 100,000 individuals, respectively. Radiation exposure from the usage of CT for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTTP) causes non-negligible increases in lifetime attributable risk. The results of this study can be used as a guide by physicians to implement strategies based on the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle that lead to a reduction dose without sacrificing diagnostic information.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Male , Female , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Radiometry , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Risk Factors
5.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 60(4): 579-589, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34542682

ABSTRACT

In the present study, radiation doses and cancer risks resulting from abdominopelvic radiotherapy planning computed tomography (RP-CT) and abdominopelvic diagnostic CT (DG-CT) examinations are compared. Two groups of patients who underwent abdominopelvic CT scans with RP-CT (n = 50) and DG-CT (n = 50) voluntarily participated in this study. The two groups of patients had approximately similar demographic features including mass, height, body mass index, sex, and age. Radiation dose parameters included CTDIvol, dose-length product, scan length, effective tube current, and pitch factor, all taken from the CT scanner console. The ImPACT software was used to calculate the patient-specific radiation doses. The risks of cancer incidence and mortality were estimated based on the BEIR VII report of the US National Research Council. In the RP-CT group, the mean ± standard deviation of cancer incidence risk for all cancers, leukemia, and all solid cancers was 621.58 ± 214.76, 101.59 ± 27.15, and 516.60 ± 189.01 cancers per 100,000 individuals, respectively, for male patients. For female patients, the corresponding risks were 742.71 ± 292.35, 74.26 ± 20.26, and 667.03 ± 275.67 cancers per 100,000 individuals, respectively. In contrast, for DG-CT cancer incidence risks were 470.22 ± 170.07, 78.23 ± 18.22, and 390.25 ± 152.82 cancers per 100,000 individuals for male patients, while they were 638.65 ± 232.93, 62.14 ± 13.74, and 575.73 ± 221.21 cancers per 100,000 individuals for female patients. Cancer incidence and mortality risks were greater for RP-CT than for DG-CT scans. It is concluded that the various protocols of abdominopelvic CT scans, especially the RP-CT scans, should be optimized with respect to the radiation doses associated with these scans.


Subject(s)
Leukemia , Radiation Exposure , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
6.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 94(5): 454-461, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29528791

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The present study attempts to calculate organ-absorbed and effective doses for cancer patients to estimate the possible cancer induction and cancer mortality risks resulting from 64-slice abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) simulations for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTTP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of 70 patients, who underwent 64-slice abdominopelvic CT scan for RTTP, voluntarily participated in the present study. To calculate organ and effective doses in a standard phantom of 70 kg, the collected dosimetric parameters were used with the ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator. Patient-specific organ dose and effective dose were calculated by applying related correction factors. For the estimation of lifetime attributable risks (LARs) of cancer incidence and cancer-related mortality, doses in radiosensitive organs were converted to risks based on the data published in Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII (BEIR VII). RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the effective dose for males and females were 13.87 ± 2.37 mSv (range: 9.25-18.82 mSv) and 13.04 ± 3.42 mSv (range: 6.99-18.37 mSv), respectively. The mean ± SD of LAR of cancer incidence was 35.34 ± 13.82 cases in males and 34.49 ± 9.63 cases in females per 100,000 persons. The LAR of cancer mortality had the mean ± SD value of 15.38 ± 4.25 and 16.72 ± 3.87 cases per 100,000 persons in males and females respectively. CONCLUSION: Increase in the LAR of cancer occurrence and mortality due to abdominopelvic treatment planning CT simulation is noticeable and should be considered.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Body Burden , Body Mass Index , Computer Simulation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Monte Carlo Method , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL