Placental abruption in parents who were born small: registry-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether parents who were born small for gestational age (below the 10th birthweight centile, SGA) have increased risk of severe or mild placental abruption. To assess whether a history of SGA in other family members modifies this intergenerational effect. DESIGN: Prospective population-based observational study. SETTING: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. POPULATION: From 1967 to 2013, 785 333 mother-offspring pairs, 643 066 father-offspring pairs, 272 941 maternal tetrads (i.e. her offspring, sibling, and niece/nephew), and 265 505 paternal tetrads were identified. METHODS: Cohort study based on linked data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relative risk (RR) of severe placental abruption (preterm birth, birthweight below the 10th centile, or perinatal death) and mild placental abruption (other cases) in families with SGA. RESULTS: Mothers who were born SGA had increased risk of severe placental abruption (RR 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.3-1.8), but not mild abruption. The paternal effects were weaker. The combined effect of SGA in the mother and her sibling on severe abruption was twofold (RR 2.4; 95% CI 1.7-3.3) compared with birthweight centiles ≥10 for both. Similarly, the effect of adding an SGA niece/nephew was twofold (RR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-3.9), whereas the combined effect of SGA in the mother, her sibling and her niece/nephew was fourfold (RR 3.6; 95% CI 1.9-6.8). CONCLUSIONS: Women who were born SGA have an increased risk of severe placental abruption. The corresponding paternal effect was modest. A history of SGA in other family members increases the generational effect. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women born small for gestational age have excess risk of placental abruption.

Investigation of relationship between quality of working life and organizational commitment of nurses in teaching hospitals in Tabriz in 2014.

The current research aimed to investigate the link between the quality of working life and the systematic commitment of nurses in the teaching hospitals in Tabriz. The methodology used was functional regarding the purpose and the proportional allocation as far as the stratified sampling method was concerned. The study population consisted of all the nurses in Tabriz. The instrument used in this study was a standard questionnaire, whose reliability was approved in national and international studies. Also data were collected and inserted into SPSS 20 software and a statistical analysis was performed. The results showed that the individuals' quality of working life had a direct effect on their action in the organization.

Familial risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: registry-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the aggregation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in relatives. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 1967 to 2008. POPULATION: All singleton, vertex-presenting infants weighing 500 g or more. Through linkage by national identification numbers, 393 856 mother-daughter pairs, 264 675 mother-son pairs, 134 889 mothers whose sisters later became mothers, 132 742 fathers whose brothers later became fathers, 131 702 mothers whose brothers later became fathers and 88 557 fathers whose sisters later became mothers were provided. METHODS: Comparison of women with and without a history of OASIS in their relatives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative risk of OASIS after a previous OASIS in the family. RESULTS: The risk of OASIS was increased if the woman's mother or sister had OASIS in a delivery (aRR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.3; aRR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.7, respectively). If OASIS occurred in one brother's partner at delivery, the risk of OASIS in the next brother's partner was modestly increased (aRR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4). If OASIS occurred in one sister at delivery, the risk of OASIS in the brother's partner was also increased a little (aRR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4). However, there was no excess occurrence in sisters whose brothers' partners had previously had OASIS (aRR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be increased familial aggregation of OASIS. These risks are stronger through the maternal rather than the paternal line of transmission, suggesting a strong genetic role that shapes aggregation of OASIS within families. These observations must be cautiously interpreted because of bias from unmeasured confounding factors may have impacted the findings.

Risk of recurrence and subsequent delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the recurrence risk, the likelihood of having further deliveries and mode of delivery after third to fourth degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. POPULATION: A cohort of 828,864 mothers with singleton, vertex-presenting infants, weighing 500 g or more, during the period 1967-2004. METHODS: Comparison of women with and without a history of OASIS with respect to the occurrence of OASIS, subsequent delivery rate and planned caesarean rate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: OASIS in second and third deliveries, subsequent delivery rate and mode of delivery. RESULTS: Adjusted odds ratios of the recurrence of OASIS in women with a history of OASIS in the first, and in both the first and second deliveries, were 4.2 (95% CI 3.9-4.5; 5.6%) and 10.6 (95% CI 6.2-18.1; 9.5%), respectively, relative to women without a history of OASIS. Instrumental deliveries, in particular forceps deliveries, birthweights of 3500 g or more and large maternity units were associated with a recurrence of OASIS. Instrumental delivery did not further increase the excess recurrence risk associated with high birthweight. A man who fathered a child whose delivery was complicated by OASIS was more likely to father another child whose delivery was complicated by OASIS in another woman who gave birth in the same maternity unit (adjusted OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-3.7; 5.6%). However, if the deliveries took place in different maternity units, the recurrence risk was not significantly increased (OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.8-2.1; 4.4%). The subsequent delivery rate was not different in women with and without previous OASIS, whereas women with a previous OASIS were more often scheduled to caesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Recurrence risks in second and third deliveries were high. A history of OASIS had little or no impact on the rates of subsequent deliveries. Women with previous OASIS were delivered more frequently by planned caesarean delivery.