Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Oncology ; 98(11): 763-770, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32629446

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Induction chemotherapy followed by cetuximab and RT (IBRT) (Arm A) was compared to cisplatin/RT (CRT) (Arm B) in a randomized phase III study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Naïve patients with stage III-IVa, histologically proven locally advanced head and neck cancer (LASCCHN) were eligible. Arm A (IBRT): 3 TPF induction followed by cetuximab-RT (equivalent daily dose 2 Gy up to 70 Gy); Arm B: 3 cisplatin concurrent with the same RT scheduling. Due to slow accrual and incomplete data collection a futility analysis was performed. RESULTS: 236/282 patients were evaluable. Therefore, no formal analyses can be made between the two arms. OS was 45.2/53.6 months in Arm A/B. Complete responses were achieved in 64% of patients in both arms. Neutropenia and skin toxicity were significantly worse in Arm A and body weight loss was significantly worse in Arm B. Compliance with the planned drug administration was higher in Arm B (p = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: The study suggests that IBRT and CRT have similar efficacy, activity and toxicity.


Subject(s)
Cetuximab/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Progression-Free Survival , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...