Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 24(6): 862-6, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25988349

ABSTRACT

With the emergence of new therapies, established patterns of treating advanced melanoma are changing. The aim of this study was to understand how advanced melanoma is treated in clinical practice in Europe following the introduction of ipilimumab and vemurafenib. An online survey was conducted between August and November 2012 with 150 oncologists and dermatologists, from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the U.K.; respondents reported treating the majority of patients with one or two lines of therapy. For BRAF mutant melanoma, the most frequently used first-line treatments were vemurafenib and dacarbazine. For BRAF wild-type melanoma, the most frequently used first-line treatment was dacarbazine. There was no single preferred agent for the second-line treatment of BRAF mutant or BRAF wild-type disease. Most sequencing from first- to second-line was from conventional dacarbazine to newer agents such as ipilimumab and vemurafenib. The treatment of advanced melanoma is rapidly evolving due to the introduction of new agents. This study presents an early insight into access to the new agents, ipilimumab and vemurafenib, and clinical practice in several European countries.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Indoles/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Cancer Care Facilities , Europe , France , Germany , Hospitals, Community , Hospitals, University , Humans , Ipilimumab , Italy , Medical Oncology , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Vemurafenib
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...