Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was done to verify the usefulness of preoperative breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 291 patients with invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed with conventional breast imaging (mammography and ultrasound) was performed. All patients underwent MR imaging prior to surgery. The MR imaging detection rate of additional malignant cancers occult to mammography and ultrasound was calculated. Data were analysed with Fisher's exact test (p<0.05) according to the following parameters: histopathological features of the index tumour (histological type and size) and mammographic density [according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification from 1 fatty to 4 dense). The gold standard was the histological examination on the surgical specimen. RESULTS: MR imaging identified 40 mammographically and sonographically occult malignant lesions other than the index cancer in 27/291 patients (9%). These additional cancers were located in the same quadrant as the index cancer in 13 women (4%), in a different quadrant in 12 (4%) and in the contralateral breast in the remaining two (1%). The cancer detection rate in the subgroup of index cancers with lobular histological type was 25%, significantly higher (p=0.03) than the detection rate of 11% recorded in the subgroup of ductal cancers. The cancer detection rate in the subgroup of index cancers >2 cm was 27%, significantly higher (p=0.001) than the rate of 8% found in the subgroup of index cancers <2 cm. Mammographic density was not correlated (p=0.48) with MR detection of additional cancer, with 14% of additional malignancies being detected in both dense and fatty breasts. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer, preoperative MR imaging is useful for detecting additional synchronous malignancies that are not detected on conventional breast imaging. The cancer detection rate is 9%. The use of preoperative MR imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast imaging in women with an infiltrating lobular index cancer and an index cancer >2 cm is especially beneficial.

Benefits of double reading of screening mammograms: retrospective study on a consecutive series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of delayed second reading of screening mammograms when added to real-time reading plus immediate assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study setting was the mammography screening programme of an Italian Local Health Unit. Recall rate and cancer detection rate at first reading or informed second reading only were assessed in a cohort of 23,629 women aged 50-69 years screened during 2007-2008. Incremental recall rate, incremental cancer detection rate and incremental cost of second reading were determined. RESULTS: Recall rate was 13.0% at first and 2.7% at second reading (incremental recall rate +21.1%). Overall, recalls were more frequent in the younger decade and in the presence of denser breasts. Cancer detection rate was 7.06‰ (n=167) at first and 0.93‰ (n=22) at second reading (incremental cancer detection rate +13.1%). Compared with first reading, second reading detected more cancers depicted as isolated microcalcifications and distortions (40.9% vs. 16.2%, p=0.02) and at a lower stage (stage 0-I 81.8% vs. 69.5%, p=0.34). The cost of adding delayed second reading was + 3.65 per screened individual or 3,926.61 per incremental cancer detected. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the efficacy of second reading, even as an adjunct to real-time single reading plus immediate assessment. Incremental recall rate is acceptable in view of the incremental cancer detection rate, and both figures are within the range of literature reports on double-reading performance.

MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the clinical value and accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 106 incidental breast lesions detected on MR imaging in 98 patients. Patients with nonpalpable suspicious lesions that were only MR visible were referred for MR-VAB performed with a 10-gauge needle. All patients with a VAB diagnosis of infiltrating carcinoma, carcinoma in situ or atypical epithelial hyperplasia were referred for surgery. Histopathology of the surgical specimen was considered the reference standard. RESULTS: MR-guided VAB was attempted in 29/106 lesions (27%); in 2/29 patients, the procedure could not be performed owing to failure to visualise the lesion. Lesions with clearly malignant features and borderline lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasias) were identified in 12 cases (44%) and benign entities in 15 (56%). Seven of 12 (58%) malignant lesions were <10 mm. Among the 27 successful MR-VAB procedures, VAB yielded one false-negative diagnosis (4%) and underestimation (4%). MR-guided VAB sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 100%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 93%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that MR-guided VAB offers good accuracy in characterising nonpalpable breast lesions visible on MR imaging alone. Small lesion size (<1 cm) did not prove to be a limitation for the success of the procedure.

Choice strategy of different dose-saving protocols in 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography.

PURPOSE: Multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography (MDCT-CA) produces high-level radiation dose because of submillimetre slice thickness and short scan time. As a result, manufacturers have produced different dose-saving protocols that may, however, reduce image quality and thus diagnostic accuracy. The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic quality of MDCT-CA using different dose-saving protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April and August 2008, we examined 65 patients with 64-slice MDCT-CA: 6/65 using the step-and-shoot dose-saving protocol, 45/65 the cardiac dose right protocol and 14/65 using a standard protocol. Image quality was evaluated on a per-patient and per-segment basis, and the effective dose of each protocol was recorded. RESULTS: In the per-patient analysis, image quality was excellent in 100% of the step-and-shoot protocols, in 91.1% of the cardiac dose right protocols and in 85.8% of the standard protocols. Effective dose to the patient considering the whole study (i.e. scout, calcium score, triggering and MDCT-CA) was 20.49 mSv in the standard protocol, 14.8 mSv in the cardiac dose right protocol and 6.63 mSv in the step-and-shoot protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The radiologist should apply the appropriate protocol in relation to the clinical indications, type of patient and information required in order to spare as much dose as possible while maintaining high image quality.