Systematic review on the predictive ability of frailty assessment measures in cardiac surgery.

Objectives: Patient frailty is increasingly recognised as contributing to adverse postoperative outcomes in cardiothoracic surgery. The goal of this review is to evaluate the predictive ability of frailty scoring systems and their limitations in risk assessment of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: Frailty studies were identified by searching electronic databases. Studies in which the measuring instrument was defined as a multidimensional tool focusing on a population undergoing cardiac operations were included. The focus was on the predictive ability of frailty in this population and a comparison with conventional risk scoring systems. Unfortunately, the lack of a significant number of studies with the same postoperative outcome precluded a formal meta-analysis. Results: Of 783 studies identified in our initial search, 6 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Frailty was identified as a predictor of mortality, morbidity and/or prolonged hospital stay in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Our systematic review revealed the increased application of frailty scores compared to standardized risk stratification scores in cardiothoracic patients. In approximately 50% of these studies, frailty scores continued to be predictive even after adjusting for the conventional risk scoring systems. Conclusions: The assessment of frailty may enhance the preoperative workup and offer an optimized risk stratification measure in patients undergoing cardiothoracic procedures even though the reporting standards of calibration and classification measures have been relatively poor.

Estates team looks to tackle skills shortages.

Concerned that engineering skills gaps, compounded by difficulties in attracting skilled tradespeople, will leave the Trust's Estates team poorly equipped and insufficiently skilled to meet the challenge of keeping a large acute hospital running efficiently over coming years, the management team within the Estates Maintenance Department at the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust has introduced a Workforce Development Programme to tackle existing skills gaps, bring in and retain able and enthusiastic new recruits, and ensure strong succession planning. HEJ editor, Jonathan Baillie, met with the Trust's director of estates, Mark Bagnall, and head of Estates Maintenance, Paul Stafford, to find out more.

Accuracy of GE digital breast tomosynthesis vs supplementary mammographic views for diagnosis of screen-detected soft-tissue breast lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of standard supplementary views and GE digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for assessment of soft-tissue mammographic abnormalities. METHODS: Women recalled for further assessment of soft-tissue abnormalities were recruited and received standard supplementary views (typically spot compression views) and two-view GE DBT. The added value of DBT in the assessment process was determined by analysing data collected prospectively by radiologists working up the cases. Following anonymization of cases, there was also a retrospective multireader review. The readers first read bilateral standard two-view digital mammography (DM) together with the supplementary mammographic views and gave a combined score for suspicion of malignancy on a five-point scale. The same readers then read bilateral standard two-view DM together with two-view DBT. Pathology data were obtained. Differences were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The study population was 342 lesions in 322 patients. The final diagnosis was malignant in 113 cases (33%) and benign/normal in 229 cases (67%). In the prospective analysis, the performance of two-view DM plus DBT was at least equivalent to the performance of two-view DM and standard mammographic supplementary views-the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.946 and 0.922, respectively, which did not reach statistical significance. Similar results were obtained for the retrospective review-AUC was 0.900 (DBT) and 0.873 (supplementary views), which did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of GE DBT in the assessment of screen detected soft-tissue abnormalities is equivalent to the use of standard supplementary mammographic views. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The vast majority of evidence relating to the use of DBT has been gathered from research using Hologic equipment. This study provides evidence for the use of the commercially available GE DBT system demonstrating that it is at least equivalent to supplementary mammographic views in the assessment of soft-tissue screen-detected abnormalities.