Value of rare diseases reference centers: impact on diagnosis and access to specialized care in fibrous dysplasia of bone.

INTRODUCTION: Reference Centers and Rare Disease Health Networks aim to improve the management of patients with rare diseases. The French reference center for Fibrous Dysplasia was certified in 2006. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the effectiveness of our reference center since its constitution. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we compared the activity of our center, including the time elapsed between access to the center and the diagnostic delay of patients with Fibrous Dysplasia between two periods, 1994-2006 (before certification) and 2007-2019 (after certification). Data were extracted from patients' records (Easily®). Wilcoxon and Fisher tests were performed, using R®. RESULTS: Our cohort included 527 patients with Fibrous Dysplasia/Mc Cune Albright syndrome. The activity of the Fibrous Dysplasia center increased from 139 patients in the first period (1994-2006) to an additional 388 patients for the second period (2007-2019). Mean time elapsed to diagnosis of Fibrous Dysplasia was 1.5 years before 2007 and 1.9 years after 2007 (p = 0.12). Diagnosis was made before referral in over 80% of patients. There was a non-significant decrease in the number of patients with delayed diagnosis: 37 patients (44%) in the first period had a diagnostic delay and 94 patients (33%) in the second period (p = 0.07). Patients were referred to our center on average 6.8 years (before 2007) and 7.9 years (after 2007) after their diagnosis (p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Healthcare organization with reference centers significantly impacted the management of patients with Fibrous Dysplasia/Mc Cune Albright syndrome, with a substantial increase in the activity of our center, that roughly tripled since certification. This healthcare organization was also associated with a trend toward decreasing diagnostic delay. However, diagnostic delay affected more than a third of patients and the time to access to the center remained extended (≈7-8 years after diagnosis). The current challenge lies in informing primary care providers and patients about education to rare diseases and existence of reference centers for earlier and more effective specialized management.

Denosumab use in bone fibrous dysplasia refractory to bisphosphonate: A retrospective multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: Increased RANKL expression is observed in the bone tissue of fibrous dysplasia of bone/McCune-Albright syndrome (FD/MAS). In one animal model of FD/MAS, the inhibition of RANKL reduced tumor volume. A beneficial effect of denosumab on pain in patients refractory to bisphosphonates has been reported, but without systematic quantification of pain improvement. This work describes the clinical experience of our group on the efficacy on pain of denosumab treatment, along with safety, in FD/MAS patients refractory to bisphosphonates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective multicenter study in 6 academic rheumatology centers in France. We have collected patients and FD/MAS characteristics, duration of prior exposure to bisphosphonates, denosumab treatment modalities (dosage - administration regimen - number of courses); evolution of pain evaluated by Visual Analogic Scale (VAS). RESULTS: 13 patients were included (10 women and 3 men) 45 years on average, 5 MAS, 4 monostotic and 4 polyostotic forms. The average duration post-diagnosis of FD/MAS was 25 years and the mean duration of prior exposure to bisphosphonates was 4.7 years. Pain could be analyzed in 7 patients, showing a significant improvement from a mean VAS of 7.8 to 2.9 (-4.9 points, p = 0.003). In one patient with fronto-orbital FD/MAS, a 30 % decrease in lesional volume, assessed by MRI, was observed within 6 months of treatment, that was sustained over the following 12 months. Treatment regimens were heterogeneous. No hypercalcemia was observed after treatment cessation and the clinical tolerance was good. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that denosumab reduces pain in patients with DF/MAS refractory to bisphosphonates, and quantifies this improvement for the first time in a multicenter study. In our cohort, no patients who discontinued denosumab developed hypercalcemia and clinical tolerance was overall good. This study also provides encouraging data regarding lesion volume control. Further controlled studies are required to determine the place and modalities of the denosumab treatment of FD/MAS. CONCLUSION: Denosumab significantly decreased pain in FD/MAS refractory to bisphosphonate. This study paves the way for a randomized clinical trial to validate and standardize the prescription of denosumab in FD/MAS.