Differential metabolic effects of oral butyrate treatment in lean versus metabolic syndrome subjects.

BACKGROUND: Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) have been associated with beneficial metabolic effects. However, the direct effect of oral butyrate on metabolic parameters in humans has never been studied. In this first in men pilot study, we thus treated both lean and metabolic syndrome male subjects with oral sodium butyrate and investigated the effect on metabolism. METHODS: Healthy lean males (n = 9) and metabolic syndrome males (n = 10) were treated with oral 4 g of sodium butyrate daily for 4 weeks. Before and after treatment, insulin sensitivity was determined by a two-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp using [6,6-2H2]-glucose. Brown adipose tissue (BAT) uptake of glucose was visualized using 18F-FDG PET-CT. Fecal SCFA and bile acid concentrations as well as microbiota composition were determined before and after treatment. RESULTS: Oral butyrate had no effect on plasma and fecal butyrate levels after treatment, but did alter other SCFAs in both plasma and feces. Moreover, only in healthy lean subjects a significant improvement was observed in both peripheral (median Rd: from 71 to 82 µmol/kg min, p < 0.05) and hepatic insulin sensitivity (EGP suppression from 75 to 82% p < 0.05). Although BAT activity was significantly higher at baseline in lean (SUVmax: 12.4 ± 1.8) compared with metabolic syndrome subjects (SUVmax: 0.3 ± 0.8, p < 0.01), no significant effect following butyrate treatment on BAT was observed in either group (SUVmax lean to 13.3 ± 2.4 versus metabolic syndrome subjects to 1.2 ± 4.1). CONCLUSIONS: Oral butyrate treatment beneficially affects glucose metabolism in lean but not metabolic syndrome subjects, presumably due to an altered SCFA handling in insulin-resistant subjects. Although preliminary, these first in men findings argue against oral butyrate supplementation as treatment for glucose regulation in human subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Bromocriptine and insulin sensitivity in lean and obese subjects.

Bromocriptine is a glucose-lowering drug, which was shown to be effective in obese subjects with insulin resistance. It is usually administered in the morning. The exact working mechanism of bromocriptine still has to be elucidated. Therefore, in this open-label randomized prospective cross-over mechanistic study, we assessed whether the timing of bromocriptine administration (morning vs evening) results in different effects and whether these effects differ between lean and obese subjects. We studied the effect of bromocriptine on insulin sensitivity in 8 lean and 8 overweight subjects using an oral glucose tolerance test. The subjects used bromocriptine in randomized cross-over order for 2 weeks in the morning and 2 weeks in the evening. We found that in lean subjects, bromocriptine administration in the evening resulted in a significantly higher post-prandial insulin sensitivity as compared with the pre-exposure visit (glucose area under the curve (AUC) 742 mmol/L * 120 min (695-818) vs 641 (504-750), P = 0.036, AUC for insulin did not change, P = 0.575). In obese subjects, both morning and evening administration of bromocriptine resulted in a significantly higher insulin sensitivity: morning administration in obese: insulin AUC (55,900 mmol/L * 120 min (43,236-96,831) vs 36,448 (25,213-57,711), P = 0.012) and glucose AUC P = 0.069; evening administration in obese: glucose AUC (735 mmol/L * 120 min (614-988) vs 644 (568-829), P = 0.017) and insulin AUC, P = 0.208. In conclusion, bromocriptine increases insulin sensitivity in both lean and obese subjects. In lean subjects, this effect only occurred when bromocriptine was administrated in the evening, whereas in the obese, insulin sensitivity increased independent of the timing of bromocriptine administration.

Role of the autonomic nervous system in activation of human brown adipose tissue: A review of the literature.

Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is able to convert calories into heat rather than storing them. Therefore, activated BAT could be a potential target in the battle against obesity and type 2 diabetes. This review focuses on the role of the autonomic nervous system in the activation of human BAT. Although the number of studies focusing on BAT in humans is limited, involvement of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in BAT activation is evident. Metabolic BAT activity can be visualized with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose, whereas sympathetic activation of BAT can be visualized with nuclear-medicine techniques using different radiopharmaceuticals. Also, interruption of the sympathetic nerves leading to BAT activation diminishes sympathetic stimulation, resulting in reduced metabolic BAT activity. Furthermore, both ß- and α-adrenoceptors might be important in the stimulation process of BAT, as pretreatment with propranolol or α-adrenoceptor blockade also diminishes BAT activity. In contrast, high catecholamine levels are known to activate and recruit BAT. There are several interventional studies in which BAT was successfully inhibited, whereas only one interventional study aiming to activate BAT resulted in the intended outcome. Most studies have focused on the SNS for activating BAT, although the parasympathetic nervous system might also be a target of interest. To better define the possible role of BAT in strategies to combat the obesity epidemic, it seems likely that future studies focusing on both histology and imaging are essential for identifying the factors and receptors critical for activation of human BAT.

The influence of aspirin dose and glycemic control on platelet inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose aspirin seems to offer no benefit in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). The anti-platelet effect may be diminished by poor glycemic control or inadequate dosing of aspirin. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of both glycemic control and increasing aspirin dose on platelet response to aspirin in DM2 patients and matched controls. PATIENTS/METHODS: Platelet effects of increasing doses of aspirin (30, 100 and 300 mg daily) were prospectively assessed in 94 DM2 patients and 25 matched controls by measuring thromboxane levels in urine (11-dhTxB2) and platelet aggregation using VerifyNow(®) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA). DM2 patients were stratified for glycemic control (hemoglobin-A1c [HbA1c] ≤ 53, 53-69, ≥ 69 mmol mol(-1)). RESULTS: At baseline, median 11-dhTxB2 excretion was higher in the poorly controlled patients (77 ng mmol(-1)), and the moderately controlled (84 ng mmol(-1)) compared with the well-controlled patients (64 ng mmol(-1)) and controls (53 ng mmol(-1)), P < 0.01. Next, 30 mg of aspirin reduced 11-dhTxB2 excretion to 31, 29 and 24 ng mmol(-1) in the poorly, moderately and well-controlled patients, respectively, and to 19 ng mmol(-1) in controls, P < 0.001. VerifyNow(®) and LTA were also incompletely suppressed in DM2 patients using 30 mg of aspirin, but 100 mg resulted in similar platelet suppression in all groups, with no additional effect of 300 mg. CONCLUSIONS: DM2 patients with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c > 53 mmol mol(-1)) have higher baseline platelet activity and incomplete suppression of platelet activity with 30 mg of aspirin. However, 100 mg of aspirin leads to optimal inhibition irrespective of glycemic control, and 300 mg does not further improve platelet suppression.