Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(15): 345-350, 2024 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635488

ABSTRACT

Meningococcal disease is a life-threatening invasive infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis. Two quadrivalent (serogroups A, C, W, and Y) meningococcal conjugate vaccines (MenACWY) (MenACWY-CRM [Menveo, GSK] and MenACWY-TT [MenQuadfi, Sanofi Pasteur]) and two serogroup B meningococcal vaccines (MenB) (MenB-4C [Bexsero, GSK] and MenB-FHbp [Trumenba, Pfizer Inc.]), are licensed and available in the United States and have been recommended by CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). On October 20, 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a pentavalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp [Penbraya, Pfizer Inc.]) for prevention of invasive disease caused by N. meningitidis serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y among persons aged 10-25 years. On October 25, 2023, ACIP recommended that MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp may be used when both MenACWY and MenB are indicated at the same visit for the following groups: 1) healthy persons aged 16-23 years (routine schedule) when shared clinical decision-making favors administration of MenB vaccine, and 2) persons aged ≥10 years who are at increased risk for meningococcal disease (e.g., because of persistent complement deficiencies, complement inhibitor use, or functional or anatomic asplenia). Different manufacturers' serogroup B-containing vaccines are not interchangeable; therefore, when MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp is used, subsequent doses of MenB should be from the same manufacturer (Pfizer Inc.). This report summarizes evidence considered for these recommendations and provides clinical guidance for the use of MenACWY-TT/MenB-FHbp.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Infections , Meningococcal Vaccines , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B , Neisseria meningitidis , Humans , Advisory Committees , Immunization , Meningococcal Infections/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Vaccines, Combined , Adolescent , Young Adult
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(49): 1327-1330, 2023 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38060431

ABSTRACT

Poliovirus can cause poliomyelitis and lifelong paralysis. Although wild poliovirus types 2 and 3 have been eradicated, wild poliovirus type 1 and vaccine-derived polioviruses are still circulating in multiple countries worldwide. In 2022, a case of paralytic polio caused by vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 was identified in an unvaccinated young adult in New York. This case and subsequent detection of community transmission underscored the ongoing risk for importation of poliovirus into the United States and risk for poliomyelitis among unvaccinated persons. However, previous Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations for adult polio vaccination were limited to adults known to be at increased risk for exposure. During October 2022-June 2023, the ACIP Polio Vaccine Work Group reviewed data on poliovirus surveillance and epidemiology, safety and effectiveness of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), and other considerations outlined in the ACIP Evidence to Recommendations Framework. On June 21, 2023, ACIP voted to recommend that all U.S. adults aged ≥18 years who are known or suspected to be unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated against polio complete a primary polio vaccination series with IPV. This report summarizes evidence considered for this recommendation and provides clinical guidance for the use of IPV in adults.


Subject(s)
Poliomyelitis , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated , Poliovirus , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Advisory Committees , Immunization , New York , Poliomyelitis/epidemiology , Poliomyelitis/prevention & control , Poliomyelitis/etiology , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/adverse effects , Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(46): 1465-1470, 2022 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36395065

ABSTRACT

Vaccination is the main means for preventing measles, mumps, and rubella virus infections and their related complications (1,2). Achieving and maintaining high 2-dose measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination coverage in the United States has led to elimination of endemic measles in 2000, rubella and congenital rubella syndrome in 2004, and a sharp decrease in mumps cases. However, measles and rubella remain endemic in many countries, leading to importations of cases and occasional local transmission within the United States (3). Reported U.S. mumps cases declined >99% from the prevaccine period (4); however, mumps is endemic worldwide, and since 2006, the number of mumps cases and mumps outbreaks has increased in the United States, with wider geographic spread since 2016 (4). Given the risk for importation of measles and rubella and the resurgence of mumps, maintaining high measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination coverage is important. Since 1978, only one MMR vaccine, M-M-R II (Merck and Co., Inc.), has been available in the United States. On June 6, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration approved a second MMR vaccine, PRIORIX (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals), for the prevention of measles, mumps, and rubella in persons aged ≥12 months. The three live attenuated viruses contained in PRIORIX are genetically similar or identical to the corresponding components in M-M-R II (Table) (5-7). On June 23, 2022, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) unanimously recommended PRIORIX as an option to prevent measles, mumps, and rubella according to the existing recommended schedules and for off-label uses (i.e., indications not included in the package insert)* (1,2). ACIP considered PRIORIX to be safe, immunogenic, and noninferior to M-M-R II. Both PRIORIX and M-M-R II are fully interchangeable for all indications for which MMR vaccination is recommended. This report contains ACIP recommendations specific to PRIORIX and supplements the existing ACIP recommendations for MMR use (1,2).


Subject(s)
Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Humans , Advisory Committees , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(18): 619-627, 2022 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35511716

ABSTRACT

Human rabies is an acute, progressive encephalomyelitis that is nearly always fatal once symptoms begin. Several measures have been implemented to prevent human rabies in the United States, including vaccination of targeted domesticated and wild animals, avoidance of behaviors that might precipitate an exposure (e.g., provoking high-risk animals), awareness of the types of animal contact that require postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), and use of proper personal protective equipment when handling animals or laboratory specimens. PEP is widely available in the United States and highly effective if administered after an exposure occurs. A small subset of persons has a higher level of risk for being exposed to rabies virus than does the general U.S. population; these persons are recommended to receive preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a series of human rabies vaccine doses administered before an exposure occurs, in addition to PEP after an exposure. PrEP does not eliminate the need for PEP; however, it does simplify the rabies PEP schedule (i.e., eliminates the need for rabies immunoglobulin and decreases the number of vaccine doses required for PEP). As rabies epidemiology has evolved and vaccine safety and efficacy have improved, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations to prevent human rabies have changed. During September 2019-November 2021, the ACIP Rabies Work Group considered updates to the 2008 ACIP recommendations by evaluating newly published data, reviewing frequently asked questions, and identifying barriers to adherence to previous ACIP rabies vaccination recommendations. Topics were presented and discussed during six ACIP meetings. The following modifications to PrEP are summarized in this report: 1) redefined risk categories; 2) fewer vaccine doses in the primary vaccination schedule; 3) flexible options for ensuring long-term protection, or immunogenicity; 4) less frequent or no antibody titer checks for some risk groups; 5) a new minimum rabies antibody titer (0.5 international units [IUs]) per mL); and 6) clinical guidance, including for ensuring effective vaccination of certain special populations.


Subject(s)
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Rabies Vaccines , Rabies , Advisory Committees , Animals , Humans , Immunization , Immunization Schedule , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Rabies/epidemiology , Rabies/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination
5.
Vaccine ; 38(45): 6979-6984, 2020 10 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32981779

ABSTRACT

Incidence of measles is increasing in the US, largely due to transmission among growing unvaccinated communities. To elucidate predictors of parental decision to obtain measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine for unvaccinated children during a measles outbreak, we surveyed families among a vaccine-hesitant Somali community in Minnesota. The survey assessed attitudes and beliefs about MMR vaccine, motivators for vaccinating, and intention to vaccinate future children on time. Among 300 families surveyed, 95% vaccinated their child with MMR due to fear of measles. The predominating parental concern about MMR vaccine (71%) was a fallacious presumed connection between vaccination and autism. Only 41% of parents intended to vaccinate future children on time with MMR; parents who received recommendations for MMR vaccination from multiple sources were more likely than other parents to intend to do so. These findings support the importance of diverse outreach efforts to increase vaccine coverage among undervaccinated communities.


Subject(s)
Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Attitude , Child , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Minnesota/epidemiology , Parents , Somalia , Vaccination
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(27): 713-717, 2017 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28704350

ABSTRACT

On April 10, 2017, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) was notified about a suspected measles case. The patient was a hospitalized child aged 25 months who was evaluated for fever and rash, with onset on April 8. The child had no history of receipt of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and no travel history or known exposure to measles. On April 11, MDH received a report of a second hospitalized, unvaccinated child, aged 34 months, with an acute febrile rash illness with onset on April 10. The second patient's sibling, aged 19 months, who had also not received MMR vaccine, had similar symptoms, with rash onset on March 30. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing of nasopharyngeal swab or throat specimens performed at MDH confirmed measles in the first two patients on April 11, and in the third patient on April 13; subsequent genotyping identified genotype B3 virus in all three patients, who attended the same child care center. MDH instituted outbreak investigation and response activities in collaboration with local health departments, health care facilities, child care facilities, and schools in affected settings. Because the outbreak occurred in a community with low MMR vaccination coverage, measles spread rapidly, resulting in thousands of exposures in child care centers, schools, and health care facilities. By May 31, 2017, a total of 65 confirmed measles cases had been reported to MDH (Figure 1); transmission is ongoing.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Measles/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Measles/prevention & control , Measles virus/genetics , Measles virus/isolation & purification , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Minnesota/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
7.
Minn Med ; 98(10): 33-6, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26596077

ABSTRACT

Over the past 10 years, Minnesota clinicians have noticed increased resistance to MMR vaccination among Somali Minnesotans. Misinformation about a discredited study asserting a link between the MMR vaccine and autism has permeated this community as parents have increasingly become concerned about the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among their children. As a result, MMR vaccination rates among U.S.-born children of Somali descent are declining. This article reports findings from an investigation by the Minnesota Department of Health, which was undertaken to better understand vaccine hesitancy among Somali Minnesotans. Based on these and other findings, we propose a multi-pronged approach for increasing vaccination rates in this population.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Islam/psychology , Treatment Refusal/ethnology , Treatment Refusal/psychology , Vaccination/psychology , Adolescent , Autism Spectrum Disorder/ethnology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/prevention & control , Autism Spectrum Disorder/psychology , Child , Child, Preschool , Communication , Humans , Infant , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Minnesota , Physician-Patient Relations , Somalia/ethnology
8.
Minn Med ; 98(9): 47-8, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26442357

ABSTRACT

Meningococcal disease outbreaks recently have occurred in several U.S. cities among men who are HIV-infected and who have had sex with other men. This article describes the first similar case of meningococcal meningitis serogroup C in Minnesota, which was confirmed this summer. It also offers vaccination guidance for physicians who care for patients who may be at high risk for the disease.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Homosexuality, Male , Meningitis, Meningococcal/prevention & control , Meningitis, Meningococcal/transmission , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/transmission , Humans , Male , Meningococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Minnesota , Risk Factors
9.
Pediatrics ; 134(1): e220-8, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913790

ABSTRACT

Measles is readily spread to susceptible individuals, but is no longer endemic in the United States. In March 2011, measles was confirmed in a Minnesota child without travel abroad. This was the first identified case-patient of an outbreak. An investigation was initiated to determine the source, prevent transmission, and examine measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine coverage in the affected community. Investigation and response included case-patient follow-up, post-exposure prophylaxis, voluntary isolation and quarantine, and early MMR vaccine for non-immune shelter residents >6 months and <12 months of age. Vaccine coverage was assessed by using immunization information system records. Outreach to the affected community included education and support from public health, health care, and community and spiritual leaders. Twenty-one measles cases were identified. The median age was 12 months (range, 4 months to 51 years) and 14 (67%) were hospitalized (range of stay, 2-7 days). The source was a 30-month-old US-born child of Somali descent infected while visiting Kenya. Measles spread in several settings, and over 3000 individuals were exposed. Sixteen case-patients were unvaccinated; 9 of the 16 were age-eligible: 7 of the 9 had safety concerns and 6 were of Somali descent. MMR vaccine coverage among Somali children declined significantly from 2004 through 2010 starting at 91.1% in 2004 and reaching 54.0% in 2010 (χ(2) for linear trend 553.79; P < .001). This was the largest measles outbreak in Minnesota in 20 years, and aggressive response likely prevented additional transmission. Measles outbreaks can occur if undervaccinated subpopulations exist. Misunderstandings about vaccine safety must be effectively addressed.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Minnesota , Young Adult
10.
Minn Med ; 97(5): 50-1, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24941597

ABSTRACT

Immunization rates are one of the many measures of quality care that are of interest to physicians. Immunization rates for children younger than 3 years of age in Minnesota have held steady between 80% and 90%. One reason they have not increased is because of emerging hesitancy among some parents to vaccinate their children. This article describes what research has taught us about working with vaccine-hesitant parents and how starting a conversation in a way that presumes parents will vaccinate may improve the odds of children getting immunized.


Subject(s)
Communication , Parental Consent , Parents/education , Vaccination , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Parental Consent/psychology , Parents/psychology , Persuasive Communication , Treatment Refusal/psychology , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
11.
Minn Med ; 96(4): 49-50, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23926833

ABSTRACT

Primary care physicians are encountering a growing number of parents who have concerns about vaccinating their children. This article describes the C.A.S.E. (Corroborate, About me, Science, Explain/Advise) approach to talking to such parents about the importance of vaccination.


Subject(s)
Communication , Parental Consent , Parents/education , Physicians, Primary Care , Professional-Family Relations , Vaccination , Child, Preschool , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Infant , Minnesota , Parental Consent/psychology , Parents/psychology , Physicians, Primary Care/psychology , Vaccination/psychology
12.
N Engl J Med ; 364(24): 2316-23, 2011 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21675890

ABSTRACT

A 44-year-old woman with long-standing common variable immunodeficiency who was receiving intravenous immune globulin suddenly had paralysis of all four limbs and the respiratory muscles, resulting in death. Type 2 vaccine-derived poliovirus was isolated from stool. The viral capsid protein VP1 region had diverged from the vaccine strain at 12.3% of nucleotide positions, and the two attenuating substitutions had reverted to the wild-type sequence. Infection probably occurred 11.9 years earlier (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9 to 13.2), when her child received the oral poliovirus vaccine. No secondary cases were identified among close contacts or 2038 screened health care workers. Patients with common variable immunodeficiency can be chronically infected with poliovirus, and poliomyelitis can develop despite treatment with intravenous immune globulin.


Subject(s)
Common Variable Immunodeficiency/complications , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , Poliomyelitis/etiology , Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral/adverse effects , Poliovirus/isolation & purification , Adult , Amino Acid Sequence , Fatal Outcome , Feces/virology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Poliomyelitis/diagnosis , Poliovirus/genetics , Poliovirus/immunology , Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral/immunology , Sequence Alignment , Spinal Cord/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...