Rates and Predictors of Structural Valve Degeneration and Failure of Trifecta Bioprosthetic Valve Over a 5-year Follow-up Period: A Single-center Experience.

Introduction: The Trifecta bioprosthetic valve has been commonly used for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Multiple studies have been done to define the rate of structural valve degeneration (SVD) and failure (SVF), but the outcomes are still debatable. Therefore, we aim to conduct this single-center study to estimate the rate and predictors of SVD/SVF. Methodology: This retrospective observational cohort single-center study was conducted between 2014 and 2019 among Trifecta SAVR patients. Data were patient's characteristics collected from electronic medical records at baseline and follow-up (3-5 years). Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. Results: A total of 271 eligible patients were identified. Most of our sample were males (57.9%), with a mean age of 71.1 ± 10.6 years. The mean baseline preoperative ejection fraction (EF) was 53.0%, with no change (P = 0.88) in the immediate postoperative EF (53.6%). A most recent follow-up EF revealed a significant increase of EF (55.2%), P = 0.01. Furthermore, there was a significant increase from peak velocity to PVMRE (mean difference [MD] ± standard error of mean (SEM) [0.15 ± 0.04], P < 0.01), an increase in pressure gradient (PGIPE) to PGMRE (MD ± SEM [1.70 ± 0.49], P < 0.01), and a decrease in Doppler velocity index (DVIIPE) to DVIMRE (MD ± SEM [-0.037 ± 0.01], P = 0.01). Regarding the SVF rate, 13 (4.8%) patients had failed valves requiring replacement throughout the study period. Conclusions: Over a 5-year follow-up period, 4.8% had SVF with an SVD of 23.2%, with the majority of SVD not being clinically significant except in six patients. These results corroborate with a previously published study suggesting a bad clinical outcome of Trifecta valve placement.

Short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following complex percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: The optimal composition and duration of antiplatelet therapy after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by monotherapy vs. 12 months of DAPT. METHOD: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried for studies comparing 1-3 months of DAPT followed by monotherapy vs. 12 months of DAPT in the outcomes of complex PCI from inception through January 2023. Outcomes of interest included major bleeding, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and stroke. RESULTS: Compared to 12 months, 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy had a weak association with less major bleeding (OR 0.67; 95 % CI, 0.44-1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 28 %). There were no significant differences between the shorter and longer antiplatelet therapy in terms of all-cause mortality (OR 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.59-1.16; p = 0.21; I2 = 17 %), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.53-0.42; p = 0.50; I2 = 0), MI (OR 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.69-1.35; p = 0.82; I2 = 32 %), stent thrombosis (OR 1.17, 95 % CI, 0.77-1.76; p = 0.38; I2 = 0 %), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.05, 95 % CI, 0.58-1.89; p = 0.82; I2 = 64 %), or stroke (OR 1.10, 95 % CI, 0.55-2.17; p = 0.37; I2 = 7 %);. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing complex PCI, DAPT for 1-3 months may be associated with less major bleeding but similar rates of cardiovascular events (death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis, and revascularization) compared to DAPT for 12 months.

Short Versus Long Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation in Patients with Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, with increasing data suggestive of acceptable short-term duration. Metabolically accelerated atherosclerosis associated with diabetes makes it essential to study short-term DAPT in this subgroup. With limited studies determining optimal DAPT strategies after second-generation stents in this subset, we aimed to establish the optimal duration of DAPT in the diabetic population using second-generation stents. QUESTION: To determine optimal DAPT duration in diabetic population undergoing PCI in 2nd generation stents. DATA SOURCES: We conducted an electronic database search of randomized controlled trials from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis was conducted comparing outcomes of short-term (3-6 months) DAPT therapy versus long-term (12 months) DAPT therapy in the diabetic population undergoing PCI with second-generation stents. RESULTS: A total of 5 randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 3117 diabetic patients. Short-term DAPT did not show any statistical difference from long-term DAPT in achieving primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.35, P = 0.84). Overall mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.52-1.63, P = 0.98), myocardial infarction [odds ratio (OR)OR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.53-1.94, P = 0.85], stent thrombosis (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.55-2.60, P = 0.55), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.45-2.73, P = 0.74), and stroke (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.082-2.43, P = 0.81) did not show any statistical difference between the 2 groups. Similarly, a subgroup analysis of study population comparing 6 versus 12 months of DAPT in diabetic population did not show any difference in net primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.86, 95% CI 0.45-1.45, P = 0.60). There was no significant heterogeneity noted between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed no statistically significant benefit of longer DAPT over shorter DAPT therapy in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent in patients with diabetes.

A Rare Case of Idiopathic Failure of a Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve.

A 65-year-old female with a significant history of two previous mitral valve replacement surgeries for mitral regurgitation was found to have severe mitral regurgitation again. She was determined to have a flail anterior mitral valve leaflet and underwent redo open sternotomy mitral valve replacement. This report serves to provide an example of an uncommon case of valve failure in an effort to alert clinicians to this potential complication.

Demographics and Trends of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy-Related Mortality in the United States, 1999-2020.

There are limited data on the mortality trends of HCM in the United States. To study the demographics and trends of mortality in patients with HCM, a retrospective cohort analysis was done with mortality data of patients with HCM listed as an underlying cause of death in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database (CDC-WONDER) from January 1999 to December 2020. The analysis took place in February 2022. First, we measured HCM-related age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) per 100,000 US population stratified by sex, race, ethnicity, and geographic area. We then calculated the Annual Percentage Change (APC) for AAMR for each. A total of 24,655 HCM-related deaths occurred between 1999 and 2020. The AAMR for HCM-related deaths declined from 0.5/100,000 patients in 1999 to 0.2 in 2020. The APC changes are as follows: -6.8 (95% CI: -11.8 to -1.5) from 2002 to 2009, -1.23 (95% CI -13.8 to 13.2) from 2009 to 2014, -6.71 (95% CI -46.2 to 61.7) from 2014 to 2017 and remained at 2.07 (95% CI -26.1 to 41.1) from 2017 to 2020. Men had consistently higher AAMR than women. Overall, AAMR in men was 0.4 (95% CI: 0.4-0.5), and in women was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.3-0.3). A similar trend was noticed in men and women over the years, starting from 1999 (AAMR men: 0.7 and women: 0.4) to 2020 (AAMR men: 0.3 and women: 0.2). AAMRs were highest among black or African American patients 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5-0.6), followed by non-Hispanic and Hispanic white 0.3 (95% CI 0.3-0.3) and Asian or Pacific Islander 0.2 (95% CI 0.2-0.2). There was substantial variation in each region in the US. States such as California, Ohio, Michigan, Oregon, and Wyoming had the highest AAMR. Large metropolitan cities had higher AAMR than non-metropolitan cities. During the study period from 1999 to 2020, HCM-related mortality steadily decreased. The highest AAMR was observed among men, black patients, and residents of metropolitan areas. States such as California, Ohio, Michigan, Oregon, and Wyoming had the highest AAMR.

Clopidogrel Vs Aspirin Monotherapy Following Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Current guidelines recommend 6-12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) followed by aspirin monotherapy indefinitely. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel vs aspirin in the post-PCI population after completing DAPT. We systematically searched 5 electronic databases to identify studies comparing clopidogrel with aspirin following completion of DAPT after PCI. We pooled outcomes for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, major bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. We included 5 studies with 13,850 patients, of whom 5601 (40.4%) received clopidogrel. Mean follow-up was 12-36 months. All patients received drug-eluting stents. Duration of DAPT before antiplatelet monotherapy was 1-18 months. Clopidogrel was associated with reductions in MACE (Risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.91), any stroke (RR 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.76), ischemic stroke (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.94), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.68) when compared with aspirin. Cardiac death (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.53-1.41), all-cause death (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.81-1.39), major bleeding (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.43-1.29), MI (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.64-1.60), repeat revascularization (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.71-1.09), target vessel revascularization (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.52-1.13), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.35-2.59) were not significantly different among groups. Compared with aspirin, clopidogrel was associated with reductions in MACE and stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) following DAPT completion after PCI. There were no significant differences in mortality, major bleeding, MI, and repeat revascularization between groups.

Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), stroke remains a potentially devastating complication associated with significant morbidity, and mortality. To reduce the risk of stroke, cerebral protection devices (CPD) were developed to prevent debris from embolizing to the brain during TAVI. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of CPD in TAVI. The MEDLINE (PubMed, Ovid) and Cochrane databases were queried with various combinations of medical subject headings to identify relevant articles. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate unadjusted odds ratio (OR), including subgroup analyses based on follow-up duration, study design, and type of CPD. Using a pooled analysis, CPD was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events MACE (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.81, P < 0.01), mortality (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.74, P < 0.01) and stroke (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.93, P < 0.01) in patients undergoing TAVI. Similarly, on MRI volume per lesion were lower for patients with CPD use. No significant difference was observed in acute kidney injury (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42-1.37, P = 0.68), bleeding (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.20, P = 0.55) or vascular complications (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.31, P = 0.6) for patients undergoing TAVI with CPD. In conclusion, CPD device use in TAVI is associated with a reduction of MACE, mortality, and stroke compared with patients undergoing TAVI without CPD. However, the significant reduction in mortality is driven mainly by observational studies.

Right aortic arch with common origin of right carotid and left innominate artery: A case report.

Aortic arch anomalies are rare congenital malformations with an incidence of approximately 1-3%. Right aortic arch is an anatomical variant with an incidence of <0.1% associated with various congenital heart diseases. We present a case of a 26-year-old female patient with a right aortic arch with a common origin of right carotid and left innominate artery.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a complex clinical syndrome marked by different phenotypes and related comorbidities. Transthyretin amyloidosis is an underestimated phenotype. We aim to evaluate the prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was designed to utilize PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google scholar to locate studies whose primary objective was to analyze the prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis in heart failure preserved ejection fraction. RESULTS: Of 271 studies initially identified, 5 studies comprising 670 patients were included in the final analysis. The prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis was 11%. Patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy were more likely to be males (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.75; P<0.01; I2=37%), and more likely to have low voltage criteria on ECG (RR 2.98; 95% CI 1.03 to 8.58; P=0.04; I2=75%) compared with transthyretin negative group. They also have higher SMD of age (SMD 0.73; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.97; P<0.01; I2=0%), and NT-proBNP (SMD 0.48; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.93; P=0.04; I2=36%) compared with transthyretin negative group. On reported echocardiogram, they have higher SMD of mass index (SMD 0.77; 95% CI 0.27 to 1.27; P<0.01; I2=65%), posterior wall thickness (SMD 0.92; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.21; P<0.01; I2=0%), and septal wall thickness (SMD 1.49; 95% CI 0.65 to 2.32; P<0.01; I2=87%) compared with transthyretin negative group. CONCLUSION: Transthyretin amyloidosis affects 11% of HFpEF patients. Therefore, screening HFpEF patients at risk of cardiac amyloidosis is warranted.

In-hospital outcomes of TAVR patients with a bundle branch block: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample 2011-2018.

INTRODUCTION: Data on the outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with a bundle branch block (BBB) remains limited. METHODS: We studied the outcomes of TAVR patients with a BBB from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2011 and 2018 using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2018, 194,237 patients underwent TAVR, where 1.7% (n = 3,232) had a right BBB (RBBB) and 13.7% (n = 26,689) had a left BBB (LBBB). Patients with a RBBB and LBBB had a higher rate of new permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (31.5% - RBBB, 15.7% LBBB vs. 10.2% - no BBB). RBBB was associated with a significantly longer median length of stay (5 days) and total hospitalization cost ($53,669) compared with LBBB (3 days and $47,552) and no BBB (3 days and $47,171). Trend analysis revealed lower rates of PPM implantation and reduced lengths of stay and costs across all comparison groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, patients undergoing TAVR with a BBB are associated with higher new rates of PPM implantation. RBBB is the strongest independent predictor for new PPM implantation following TAVR. Rates of new PPM implantation in TAVR patients with and without a BBB have improved over time including reductions in length of stay and hospital costs. Further study is needed to reduce the risks of PPM implantation in TAVR patients.

Same-Day Discharge After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Insights from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2015 to 2019.

Background There is a paucity of data on the feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) at a national level. Methods and Results This study used data from the Nationwide Readmission Database from the fourth quarter of 2015 through 2019 and identified patients undergoing TAVI using the claim code 02RF3. A total of 158 591 weighted hospitalizations for TAVI were included in the analysis. Of the patients undergoing TAVI, 961 (0.6%) experienced SDD. Non-SDDs included 65 814 (41.5%) patients who underwent TAVI who were discharged the next day, and 91 816 (57.9%) discharged on the second or third day. The 30-day readmission rate for SDD after TAVI was similar to non-SDD TAVI (9.8% versus 8.9%, P=0.31). The cumulative incidence of 30-day readmissions for SDD was higher compared with next-day discharge (log-rank P=0.01) but comparable to second- or third-day discharge (log-rank P=0.66). At 30 days, no differences were observed in major or minor vascular complications, heart failure, or ischemic stroke for SDD compared with non-SDD. Acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, and bleeding complications were lower with SDD. Predictors associated with SDD included age <85 years, male sex, and prior pacemaker placement, whereas left bundle-branch block, right bundle-branch block, second-degree heart block, heart failure, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, and atrial fibrillation were negatively associated with SDD. Conclusions SDD following TAVI is associated with similar 30-day readmission and complication rates compared with non-SDD. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the safety and feasibility of SDD after TAVI.

Constrictive Pericarditis: An Unusual Presentation of Rheumatoid Vasculitis.

We describe a case of rheumatoid vasculitis with an atypical presentation of constrictive pericarditis. A 51-year-old man who was previously admitted for diffuse lymphadenopathy, presented with chest pain and a lower extremity rash. Extensive workup including multimodality imaging, serology tests, and biopsy, resulted in the diagnosis of rheumatoid vasculitis.

Gender Differences in Age-Stratified Inhospital Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the National Inpatient Sample 2012 to 2018).

Contemporary data on gender differences in outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), after stratification by age, remain limited. We studied age-stratified (60 to 70, 71 to 80, and 81 to 90 years) inhospital outcomes by gender after TAVI from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2012 and 2018. We analyzed National Inpatient Sample data using the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, Ninth Revision, and Tenth Revision claims codes. Between the years 2012 and 2018, a total of 188,325 weighted hospitalizations for TAVI were included in the analysis. A total of 21,957 patients were included in the 60 to 70 age group (44% females), 60,770 (45% females) in the 71 to 80 age group, and 105,580 (50% females) in the 81 to 90 age groups, respectively. Propensity-matched inhospital mortality rates were significantly higher for females than males for the age group of 81 to 90 years (3.0% vs 2.1%, p <0.01). Vascular complications and a need for blood transfusions remained significantly higher for females on propensity-matched analysis across all categories of ages. Conversely, acute kidney injury and the need for pacemaker implantation remained significantly higher for males across all age groups. In conclusion, we report that mortality is higher in female patients who underwent TAVI between the ages of 81 to 90. Moreover, the female gender was associated with higher vascular complications and bleeding requiring transfusions. Conversely, the male gender was associated with higher rates of pacemaker implantation and acute kidney injury.

Trends and Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, A US National Propensity Matched Analysis.

Contemporary data on stroke predictors and outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains limited. We analyzed National Inpatient Sample data from the year 2011 to 2018. A total of 215,938 patients underwent TAVI. Of the patients who underwent TAVI, 4579 (2.2%) suffered from stroke and 211359 (97.8%) did not have a stroke. Adjusted mortality was higher in patients who had a stroke (10.9%) as compared to patients who did not have a stroke (3.1%). Lower percentage of patients were discharged home who developed a stroke compared to patients without a stroke (10.2% vs 52.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that at baseline, age, female sex, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease and peripheral vascular disease were significant predictors of stroke. Median Cost of care ($63367 vs $48070) and length of stay (8 vs 4 days) were considerably higher for patients with stroke when compared to the comparison group (P < 0.01 for all). In conclusion we report that stroke is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization in patients undergoing TAVI. Baseline characteristics like age, gender, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease and peripheral vascular disease are significant predictors of this adverse event.

Impact of Arrhythmias on Hospitalizations in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Cardiac involvement in amyloidosis is associated with a poor prognosis. Data on the burden of arrhythmias in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) during hospitalization are lacking. We identified the burden of arrhythmias using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from January 2016 to December 2017. We compared patient characteristics, outcomes, and hospitalization costs between CA patients with and without documented arrhythmias. Out of 5,585 hospital admissions for CA, 2,020 (36.1%) had concurrent arrhythmias. Propensity-score matching for age, sex, income, and co-morbidities was performed with 1,405 CA patients with arrhythmias and 1,405 patients without. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in CA patients with arrhythmia than without(13.9% vs 5.3%, p-value <0.001). Atrial fibrillation (AF) was the most common (72.2%) arrhythmia in CA patients with concurrent arrhythmia. The secondary outcomes of AF-related mortality (11.95% vs 9.16%, p-value = 0.02) and acute and acute on chronic as heart failure (HF) exacerbation (32.38% vs 24.91%, p-value <0.0001) were significantly higher in CA and concurrent arrhythmia compared with CA patients without. The total length of hospital stay (6[3 to 12] vs 5[3 to 10], p-value <0.001) and cost of hospitalization were ($ 15,086[7,813 to 30,373] vs $ 12,219[6,865 to 23,997], p-value = 0.001) were significantly greater among CA with arrhythmia compared with those without. These data suggest that the presence of arrhythmias in CA patients during hospital admission is associated with a poorer prognosis and may reflect patients with a higher risk of HF exacerbation and mortality.

Arrhythmias in patients with in-hospital alcohol withdrawal are associated with increased mortality: Insights from 1.5 million hospitalizations for alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Atrial arrhythmias are commonly noted in patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), requiring inpatient admission. OBJECTIVE: The burden of arrhythmias and the association with in-hospital outcomes are incompletely defined in patients hospitalized with AWS. METHODS: The nationwide inpatient sample database was accessed from September 2015 to December 2018 to identify hospitalizations for AWS. We studied a cohort of patients with arrhythmias noted during hospitalization using the appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision billing codes. We compared patient characteristics, outcomes, and hospitalization costs between alcohol withdrawal hospitalizations with and without documented arrhythmias. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression were performed to control confounders and develop odds ratios (OR), respectively. RESULTS: Among 1,511,155 hospitalization with AWS, 146,825 (9.72%) had concurrent arrhythmias. After PSM, we identified 135,540 cases in each group. Hospitalizations with AWS and concurrent arrhythmias had higher in-hospital mortality (4.19% vs 1.95%, OR 1.76, confidence interval [CI] 1.67-1.85, P < .0001). The most common arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation (66.7%). Arrhythmias in AWS were also associated with poorer in-hospital outcomes, including a higher risk of acute heart failure (8.40% vs 4.58%, OR 1.97, CI 1.90-2.05, P < .0001), acute kidney injury (21.32% vs 15.27%, OR 1.39, CI 1.36-1.43, P < .0001), and acute respiratory failure (9.19% vs 5.49%, OR 1.70, CI 1.64-1.76, P < .0001) requiring intubation. The length of hospital stay (6 days vs 4 days P < .0001) and cost of hospital care ($12,615 [$6683-$27,330] vs $7860 [$4482-$15,868], P < .0001) were higher in AWS with arrhythmias. CONCLUSION: Arrhythmia in AWS is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and poorer in-hospital outcomes.

The WATCHMAN device and post-implantation anticoagulation management. A review of key studies and the risk of device-related thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is a devastating complication of atrial fibrillation (Afib). Anticoagulation is the gold standard to prevent stroke and systemic embolization. However, many patients have a contraindication to oral anticoagulation. The WATCHMAN device, which closes the left atrial appendage, is non-inferior to warfarin to prevent embolic events in clinical trials. Post-procedural anticoagulation is needed to avoid device-related thrombosis. The use of anticoagulants after WATCHMAN implantation in patients with high bleeding risks has been a source of debate. OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the current evidence on anticoagulation following the implantation of the WATCHMAN device, focusing on patients who have an absolute contraindication to oral anticoagulation. OBSERVATION: The WATCHMAN device is efficacious and safe in preventing stroke and systemic embolization. Warfarin and aspirin are given for 45 days after implantation. If TEE at 45 days shows minimal residual peri-device flow (≤ 5mm) and no device-related thrombus, warfarin is stopped. This is followed by aspirin and clopidogrel for six months, then aspirin indefinitely. Antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for six months followed by daily aspirin indefinitely may be feasible for patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC. DOACs are more convenient to use than warfarin, and limited evidence suggests that they are not inferior following implantation of the device. CONCLUSION: Following the WATCHMAN implantation, the most often utilized regimen is warfarin followed by antiplatelet treatment. In cases where there is a high risk of bleeding, antiplatelets alone may be sufficient. More research is needed to tailor the existing antithrombotic regimen to the needs of patients.

Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials for Multivessel PCI Versus Culprit Artery Only PCI in STEMI Without Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel coronary artery disease is treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to culprit lesion only. The benefit of multivessel (MV) PCI among STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock is unclear. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database were searched from 1996 to 2019, for studies of patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock, who underwent PCI. Only randomized controlled trials comparing culprit PCI to MV PCI vs culprit vessel PCI were included for pairwise meta-analysis. All-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, reinfarction, revascularization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed for outcome variables. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials contributed 6930 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Three thousand three hundred seventy-six underwent MV PCI, and 3554 underwent culprit PCI. Our analysis demonstrated no significant difference in all-cause mortality. MV PCI had a lower risk of cardiac mortality, reinfarction, MACE and repeat revascularization compared to culprit PCI (P values <0.05). TSA showed futility for further trials to detect all-cause mortality benefit and lack of firm evidence of benefit in cardiac mortality and re-infarction, but firm evidence of benefit in revascularization and MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, MV PCI strategy was beneficial in reducing cardiac mortality, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and MACE but there was no all-cause mortality benefit when compared to culprit only PCI strategy. Evidence for benefit in cardiac mortality and re-infarction is not robust per TSA.