Effects of zatebradine (ULFS 49 CL), a sinus node inhibitor, on heart rate and exercise duration in chronic stable angina pectoris. Zatebradine Investigators.

Zatebridine selectively reduces resting and exercise heart rate without any other myocardial effects. In this study, despite significant reductions in resting and exercise heart rate, there were no clinically significant effects on myocardial ischemia, suggesting that the anti-ischemic effect of heart rate reduction should be reevaluated.

Addition of zatebradine, a direct sinus node inhibitor, provides no greater exercise tolerance benefit in patients with angina taking extended-release nifedipine: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. The Zatebradine Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of oral zatebradine, a direct sinus node inhibitor that has no blood pressure-lowering or negative inotropic effects in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris taking extended-release nifedipine. BACKGROUND: Heart rate reduction is considered an important pharmacologic mechanism for providing anginal pain relief and anti-ischemic action in patients with chronic stable angina, suggesting a benefit for sinus node-inhibiting drugs. METHODS: In a single-blind placebo run-in, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, patients already receiving extended-release nifedipine (30 to 90 mg once a day) were randomized to receive zatebradine (5 mg twice a day [n = 64]) or placebo (n = 60). All subjects had reproducible treadmill exercise-induced angina at baseline, and after randomization they performed a serial exercise test 3 h after each dose for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Zatebradine reduced rest heart rate both at 4 weeks ([mean +/- SEM] 12.9 +/- 1.23 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.6 [placebo] beats/min, p < 0.0001) and at the end of comparable stages of Bruce exercise (16.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 3.4 +/- 1.2 [placebo] beats/min, p < 0.0001). Despite the significant effects on heart rate at rest and exercise, there were no additional benefits of zatebradine from placebo baseline in measurements of total exercise duration, time to 1-mm ST segment depression or time to onset of angina. Subjects taking zatebradine also had more visual disturbances as adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Zatebradine seems to provide no additional antianginal benefit to patients already receiving nifedipine, and it raises questions regarding the benefit of heart rate reduction alone as an antianginal approach to patients with chronic stable angina.

Long-term efficacy and safety of pimobendan in moderate heart failure. A double-blind parallel 6-month comparison with enalapril. The Pimobendan-Enalapril Study Group.

In view of growing scepticism as to the efficacy and safety of agents with predominant phosphodiesterase inhibiting properties in heart failure, the clinical efficacy and safety of pimobendan, a calcium-sensitizing and partially phosphodiesterase-inhibiting compound, was compared with enalapril in 242 patients with mild to moderate heart failure (NYHA classification II-III) despite diuretics and digitalis, and abnormal haemodynamics at baseline. Patients were randomly assigned to either pimobendan (average 10.3 mg.day-1, n = 119), or enalapril (average 10.7 mg.day-1, n = 123) in a double-blind fashion for 6 months. Forty-two pimobendan and 37 enalapril patients stopped the treatment, five pimobendan and six enalapril due to worsening of failure without death, whereas 13 and eight patients, respectively, died from cardiac disorders (ns). Other reasons for discontinuation and adverse events not leading to discontinuation were also comparable. Although Holter analysis at 14 days, but not at 6 months, indicated increased ventricular extrasystoles in pimobendan patients, these did not lead to serious clinical events. NYHA classification improved similarly in both groups, from 2.51 to 2.16 (pimobendan) and from 2.40 to 2.06 (enalapril). The number of patients needing a change in background therapy or hospitalization did not differ between the two groups. Haemodynamic variables at rest were improved by both compounds after 6 months. In contrast, only enalapril improved haemodynamics during exercise, and reduced the cardiothoracic ratio. The primary endpoint, exercise capacity, increased significantly during the first 3 months by 45 and 53 s, under pimobendan and enalapril, respectively, but, although unchanged thereafter, the improvement was no longer statistically significant at 6 months in either group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)