Association Between Multimodal Analgesia Administration and Perioperative Opioid Requirements in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction.

Importance: The opioid epidemic has reignited interest in opioid-sparing strategies in managing pain. However, few studies have focused on opioid use during perioperative care in patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Objectives: To examine the association between multimodal analgesia (MMA) administration and perioperative opioid requirements in patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction and to investigate whether MMA alters the duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective case-control study, data were collected between April 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017. The study was conducted at a single cancer center in the United States. Participants were 357 patients 18 years or older scheduled for head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Exposures: Patients in the treatment group received oral celecoxib, gabapentin, and/or tramadol hydrochloride before surgery. Control group patients did not receive any of these medications. Main Outcomes and Measures: The amount of opioid administered in the operating room and in the PACU was converted to morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) for comparison between the 2 groups. The duration of stay in the PACU was based on the start time and end time of PACU care recorded by nurses in the PACU. Results: In total, 149 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.7] years; 104 [69.8%] men) were included in the treatment group, and 208 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.2 [13.6] years; 146 [70.2%] men) were included in the control group. The mean (SD) MEDD of opioid given during surgery was 51.7 (19.8) in the treatment group and 67.9 (24.7) in the control group, for a difference in the means (treatment vs control) of -16.17 (95% CI, -20.81 to -11.52). In the PACU, the mean (SD) MEDD of opioid given was 11.7 (13.3) in the treatment group and 14.9 (15.7) in the control group, for a difference in the means (treatment vs control) of -3.22 (95% CI, -6.40 to -0.03). The MMA treatment remained largely associated with reduced amount of opioid given during surgery, in the PACU, and both combined after controlling for other important factors. Conclusions and Relevance: This case-control study found that the patients who received MMA before head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction required less opioid medication. The treatment group also had shorter duration of stay in the PACU compared with the control group.

Developing an intraoperative 3T MRI-guided brachytherapy program within a diagnostic imaging suite: Methods, process workflow, and value-based analysis.

PURPOSE: We integrated a brachytherapy procedural workflow within an existing diagnostic 3.0-T (3T) MRI suite. This setup facilitates intraoperative MRI guidance for optimal applicator positioning, particularly for interstitial needle placements in gynecologic cases with extensive parametrial involvement. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Here we summarize the multidisciplinary collaboration, equipment, and supplies necessary to implement an intraoperative MRI-guided brachytherapy program; outline the operational workflow via process maps; and address safety precautions. We evaluate internal resource utilization associated with this progressive approach via time-driven activity-based costing methodology, comparing institutional costs to that of a traditional workflow (within a CT suite, followed by separate postprocedure MRI) over a single brachytherapy procedural episode. RESULTS: Resource utilization was only 15% higher for the intraoperative MRI-based workflow, attributable to use of the MRI suite and increased radiologist effort. Personnel expenses were the greatest cost drivers for either workflow, accounting for 76-77% of total resource utilization. However, use of the MRI suite allows for potential cost-shifting opportunities from other resources, such as CT, during the procedural episode. Improvements in process speed can also decrease costs: for each 10% decrease in case duration from baseline procedure time, total costs could decrease by roughly 8%. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports the feasibility of an intraoperative MRI-guided brachytherapy program within a diagnostic MRI suite and defines many of the resources required for this procedural workflow. Longer followup will define the full utility of this approach in optimizing the therapeutic ratio for gynecologic cancers, which may translate into lower costs and higher value with time, over a full cycle of care.

Additives to local anesthetics for peripheral nerve blocks: Evidence, limitations, and recommendations.

PURPOSE: The therapeutic rationale, clinical effectiveness, and potential adverse effects of medications used in combination with local anesthetics for peripheral nerve block therapy are reviewed. SUMMARY: A wide range of agents have been tested as adjuncts to peripheral nerve blocks, which are commonly performed for regional anesthesia during or after hand or arm surgery, neck or spine surgery, and other procedures. Studies to determine the comparative merits of nerve block adjuncts are complicated by the wide variety of coadministered local anesthetics and sites of administration and by the heterogeneity of primary endpoints. Sodium bicarbonate has been shown to speed the onset of mepivacaine nerve blocks but delay the onset of others. Epinephrine has been shown to prolong sensory nerve blockade and delay systemic uptake of local anesthetics, thus reducing the risk of anesthetic toxicity. Tramadol, buprenorphine, dexamethasone, and clonidine appear to be effective additives in some situations. Midazolam, magnesium, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine cannot be routinely recommended as nerve block additives due to a dearth of supportive data, modest efficacy, and (in the case of ketamine) significant adverse effects. Recent studies suggest that administering additives intravenously or intramuscularly can provide many of the benefits of perineural administration while reducing the potential for neurotoxicity, contamination, and other hazards. CONCLUSION: Some additives to local anesthetics can hasten the onset of nerve block, prolong block duration, or reduce toxicity. On the other hand, poorly selected or unnecessary additives may not have the desired effect and may even expose patients to unnecessary risks.

The emerging use of ketamine for anesthesia and sedation in traumatic brain injuries.

Traditionally, the use of ketamine for patients with traumatic brain injuries is contraindicated due to the concern of increasing intracranial pressure (ICP). These concerns, however, originated from early studies and case reports that were inadequately controlled and designed. Recently, the concern of using ketamine in these patients has been challenged by a number of published studies demonstrating that the use of ketamine was safe in these patients. This article reviews the current literature in regards to using ketamine in patients with traumatic brain injuries in different clinical settings associated with anesthesia, as well as reviews the potential mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of ketamine. Studies examining the use of ketamine for induction, maintenance, and sedation in patients with TBI have had promising results. The use of ketamine in a controlled ventilation setting and in combination with other sedative agents has demonstrated no increase in ICP. The role of ketamine as a neuroprotective agent in humans remains inconclusive and adequately powered; randomized controlled trials performed in patients undergoing surgery for traumatic brain injury are necessary.

Bilateral transversus abdominis plane block does not decrease postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared with local anesthetic infiltration of trocar insertion sites.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been shown to reduce pain and analgesic requirements after abdominal surgery. Our hypothesis was that bilateral TAP blocks decrease pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when compared with local anesthetic infiltration of trocar insertion sites. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to receive either bilateral TAP blocks or local anesthetic infiltration of trocar insertion sites with ropivacaine 0.5%. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic use for the first 24 hrs were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled in the study. After exclusions, data were analyzed on 39 patients in group T (bilateral TAP block) and 35 patients in group I (infiltration). There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores on the numeric analog scale (0-10) between the groups at 4 hrs after surgery (P = 0.18) or during the 24 hrs after surgery (P = 0.23). The time interval from anesthesia start to surgery start was greater in group T than group I (48 vs 35 mins, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference found in analgesic use during the first 24 hrs after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block is equivalent to local anesthetic infiltration of trocar insertion sites for overall postoperative pain in a heterogeneous group of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.