Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Psychiatr Serv ; 52(10): 1367-73, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11585954

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether information obtained early in the hospitalization process can be used to assess a patient's need for extended care. METHODS: A sample of 2,430 inpatients who were admitted to a state psychiatric facility during a one-year index period (January through December 1997) were randomly assigned to a primary sample or a replication sample. Data were collected on demographic characteristics and history of previous hospitalization. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Anchored Version (BPRS-A) was administered to patients within 48 hours of admission, and four new subscales derived from ratings of newly admitted patients were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with whether a patient was discharged to the community or transported to another hospital for extended care. RESULTS: A discriminant analysis of the data correctly identified 70 percent of the patients who were referred for continued hospitalization and 80 percent of the patients who were discharged to the community. The main correlates of the need for extended inpatient services were, in descending order, scores on the BPRS-A resistance subscale, the number of previous referrals for extended hospitalizations, and scores on the BPRS-A positive symptoms and psychological discomfort scales. CONCLUSIONS: BPRS-A subscale scores should be considered to be at least as good as more traditional measures in predicting length of hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Long-Term Care/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, State/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenic Psychology , Social Adjustment , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Texas/epidemiology
2.
Psychol Assess ; 13(3): 384-95, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11556275

ABSTRACT

Attending psychiatrists completed an anchored version of the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-A) based on admission and evaluation information on a total of 2,921 adult patients treated at 1 public sector acute psychiatric teaching hospital. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to a 6-month sample to construct 4 nonoverlapping subscales: Resistance, Positive Symptoms, Negative Symptoms, and Psychological Discomfort. Confirmatory factor analysis compared these new subscales to 3 other published subscale models using a second 6-month sample. Internal consistency, rater influence, and interrater agreement were estimated in separate studies. Discriminant validity was explored by comparison of diagnosis-based samples. Application of the BPRS-A as a debriefing instrument in the study of symptomatic change and the multiple challenges inherent in psychometric study of such a rating scale in realistic hospital practice are discussed.


Subject(s)
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Adult , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Hospitals, State , Humans , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Sampling Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Texas
3.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 60(2): 189-98, 2000 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10940546

ABSTRACT

This study compared depressed cocaine dependent patients (CD, N=50) with patients who were cocaine dependent only (CO, N=101) on pre-treatment psychiatric symptomatology, substance use, and psychosocial functioning. Results indicated that the CD group had more overall distress and poorer psychiatric functioning than the CO group. CD individuals scored higher on all subscales of the SCL-90-R, had a higher prevalence of antisocial personality disorder, reported higher craving for cocaine, lower self-efficacy to refrain from drug use, and lower perceived social support. These findings support the need for more intensive treatment approaches for dually-diagnosed patients.


Subject(s)
Cocaine-Related Disorders/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Psychological Tests
4.
Death Stud ; 24(8): 721-38, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11503720

ABSTRACT

The Grief Experience Questionnaire (GEQ; T.W. Barrett & T.B. Scott, 1989) is a self-report measure of grief responses, including some that have been associated with grief after a suicide (e.g., feelings of rejection, responsibility, shame, stigmatization, etc.). In this study, a sample of 350 university students who had experienced the death of a significant other completed the GEQ. A principal components analysis with varimax rotation yielded an 8-factor solution with satisfactory psychometric properties. Results clearly document that the GEQ is a multidimensional measure of grief phenomenology. It is concluded that although the GEQ has broad applicability, the scale as revised herein may have a special relevance to suicide bereavement, and may be of use in both research and clinically based applications.


Subject(s)
Grief , Surveys and Questionnaires , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans
5.
Suicide Life Threat Behav ; 29(3): 256-71, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10531638

ABSTRACT

Previous empirical investigations have produced mixed results on the question of whether mode of death differentially affects grief. To further investigate the influence of suicide on grief, 350 previously bereaved university students completed a questionnaire package consisting of several standardized measures. Participants were separated into four groups based on the mode of death experienced as either survivors of suicide (n = 34), accident (n = 57), unanticipated natural (n = 102), or anticipated natural (n = 157) deaths. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that suicide survivors, compared against the other groups, experienced more frequent feelings of rejection, responsibility, "unique" reactions, and more total grief reactions. Trends indicating increased levels of shame and perceived stigmatization were also evident. Aggregate factors of death "naturalness" and "expectedness" showed less influence than mode of death in influencing grief. Overall, results support previous clinical and research findings and intuitive logic in demonstrating that the grief experienced by suicide survivors includes elements that are less frequently seen in the case of nonsuicidal deaths.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Death , Grief , Life Change Events , Suicide/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cause of Death , Chi-Square Distribution , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/standards , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
6.
Psychiatry Res ; 89(3): 259-68, 1999 Dec 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10708272

ABSTRACT

Use of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [Overall J.E., Gorham D.R., 1988. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): recent developments in ascertainment and scaling. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 24, 97-99] percent change scores (PCSs) to measure treatment effects may be problematic because two different item-weighting systems (0-6 and 1-7) have been employed to represent the seven rating options and PCSs have demonstrated sensitivity to the item-weighting system used. This study compared the ability of a range of BPRS total scale PCS categories generated by both item-weighting procedures to predict estimates of clinical improvement in a large (N = 1415) heterogeneous acute sample of adult psychiatric inpatients. Results revealed significant differences between the two scaling systems in the proportion of patients classified into categories of PCS symptom improvement. Additional analysis suggested different optimal predictive PCS classifications for each item-weighting system: > 19% for 1-7 and > 39% for 0-6. Guidelines for BPRS publications are presented to facilitate study interpretation and replication. In light of their demonstrated limitations, it is suggested that the use of BPRS PCSs to measure treatment effects be reconsidered.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Psychotic Disorders/rehabilitation , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Adult , Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry) , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Texas
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...