Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 258, 2024 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction demonstrate improvement in left ventricular injection fraction (LVEF) after aortic valve replacement (AVR). The timing and magnitude of recovery in patients with very low LVEF (≤ 25%) in surgical or transcatheter AVR is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: Determine clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve repair (SAVR) in the subset of patients with severely reduced EF ≤ 25%. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study with primary endpoint of LVEF 1-week following either procedure. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and delayed postprocedural LVEF. T-test was used to compare variables and linear regression was used to adjust differences among baseline variables. RESULTS: 83 patients were enrolled (TAVR = 56 and SAVR = 27). TAVR patients were older at the time of procedure (TAVR 77.29 ± 8.69 vs. SAVR 65.41 ± 10.05, p < 0.001). One week post procedure, all patients had improved LVEF after both procedures (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in LVEF between either group (TAVR 33.5 ± 11.77 vs. SAVR 35.3 ± 13.57, p = 0.60). Average LVEF continued to rise and increased by 101% at final follow-up (41.26 ± 13.70). 30-day mortality rates in SAVR and TAVR were similar (7.4% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Patients with severe AS and LVEF ≤ 25% have a significant recovery in post-procedural EF following AVR regardless of method. LVEF doubled at two years post-procedure. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality or mean EF recovery between TAVR and SAVR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Indiana University institutional review board granted approval for above study numbered 15,322.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Aortic Valve/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Stroke Volume , Retrospective Studies , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors
2.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 83(3): 251-257, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38086077

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Unfractionated heparin is the most common anticoagulant used during percutaneous coronary intervention. Practice guidelines recommend an initial weight-based heparin bolus dose between 70 and 100 U/kg to achieve target activated clotting time (ACT) of 250-300 seconds. The impact of severe obesity on weight-based heparin dosing is not well studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of 424 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who received heparin for anticoagulation. We collected detailed data on cumulative heparin administration and measured ACT values in this cohort. We performed separate analyses to identify clinical predictors that may affect dose-response curves. There was significant variability in dosing with mean dose of 103.9 ± 32-U/kg heparin administered to achieve target ACT ≥ 250 seconds. Women received higher initial heparin doses when adjusted for weight than men (97.6 ± 31 vs. 89 ± 28 U/kg, P = 0.004), and only 49% of patients achieved ACT ≥ 250 s with the initial recommended heparin bolus dose (70-100 U/kg). Lower heparin dose (U/kg) was required in obese patients to achieve target ACT. In multivariate linear regression analysis with ACT as dependent variable, after inclusion of weight-based dosing for heparin, body mass index was the only significant covariate. In conclusion, there is significant variability in the therapeutic effect of heparin, with a lower weight-adjusted heparin dose required in obese patients.


Subject(s)
Heparin , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Male , Humans , Female , Heparin/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Anticoagulants , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/drug therapy
3.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 7(11): ytad540, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38025132

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 infection and the COVID-19 vaccines have been associated with rare cases of pericarditis. We present a case of constrictive pericarditis (CP) following the vaccine. Case summary: A 19-year-old healthy male started having progressive abdominal pain, emesis, dyspnoea, and pleuritic chest pain 2 weeks after the second dose of Pfizer vaccine. Computed tomography angiography chest revealed bilateral pleural effusions and pericardial thickening with effusion. Cardiac catheterization showed ventricular interdependence. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) showed septal bounce and left ventricular tethering suggestive of CP. A total pericardiectomy was performed with significant symptom improvement. Pathology showed chronic fibrosis without amyloid, iron deposits, or opportunistic infections. Patient had Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) viraemia 825 IU/mL and histoplasmosis complement-fixation positive with negative serum and urine antigen. Hypercoagulable panel and infectious workup were otherwise negative. The patient had resolution of cardiac symptoms at 3 months of follow-up. Discussion: The patient developed progressive symptoms within 2 weeks of his second Pfizer vaccine. Echocardiogram and CMR had classic signs of CP, and pericardial pathology confirmed fibrotic pericardium. The patient had no prior surgery, thoracic radiation, or bacterial infection. Epstein-Barr Virus viraemia was thought to be reactionary, and histoplasmosis complement likely represented chronic exposure. The timing of symptoms and negative multidisciplinary workup raises the suspicion for COVID vaccine-induced CP. The COVID vaccines benefits far exceed the risks, but complications still can occur. Practitioners should have a high index of suspicion to allow prompt diagnosis of CP.

4.
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg ; 12(4): 463-470, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34278862

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The timing and nature of and risk factors for reoperation after the arterial switch operation in the setting of d-transposition of the great arteries requires further elucidation. METHODS: A total of 403 patients who underwent arterial switch operation from 1986 to 2017 were reviewed. Institutional preference was for pulmonary artery reconstruction using a pantaloon patch of fresh autologous pericardium. The targets for coronary artery reimplantation were identified by intermittent root distension. Multivariable analysis was used to identify risk factors for reoperation. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 8.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-16.9). Pulmonary arterioplasty was the most common reoperation (n = 11, 2.7%) at 3.3 years (IQR: 1.4-11.4) postoperatively. Subvalvar right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction (RVOTR) was required in nine (2.2%) patients at 2.5 years (IQR: 1.1-5.3) postoperatively. Aortic valve repair or replacement (AVR/r) was required in seven (1.7%) patients at 13.6 years (IQR: 10.0-15.8) postoperatively. Aortic root replacement (ARR) and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft/coronary patch arterioplasty were required in five (1.2%) patients each at 13.6 years (IQR: 11.0-15.3) and 11.3 years (IQR: 2.3-13.6) postoperatively, respectively. Taussig-Bing anomaly was a risk factor for any reoperation (P = .034). Risk factors for specific reoperations included ventricular septal defect for AVR/r (P = .038), Taussig-Bing anomaly for RVOTR (P = .004), and pulmonary artery banding for ARR (P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Pantaloon patch pulmonary artery reconstruction and intermittent neo-aortic root distension during coronary reimplantation have minimized respective outflow tract reoperations. Certain anatomic subsets carry different risks for late reoperation, and pulmonary artery and/or RVOT reinterventions tend to occur sooner than aortic reinterventions. Special attention to these higher risk subpopulations will be critical to optimizing lifelong outcomes.


Subject(s)
Arterial Switch Operation , Transposition of Great Vessels , Arterial Switch Operation/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Transposition of Great Vessels/surgery , Treatment Outcome
5.
Radiology ; 223(1): 275-80, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11930078

ABSTRACT

The authors developed and evaluated a method to automatically create interactive vascular curved planar reformations with computed tomographic (CT) angiographic data. The method decreased user interaction time by 86%, from 15 to 2 minutes. Expert reviewers were asked to indicate their confidence in differentiating automatically created images from clinical-quality manually produced images. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.45 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.51), and a test of equivalency indicated that reviewers could not distinguish between images. They also graded image quality as equivalent to that with manual methods and found fewer artifacts on automatically created images. Automatic methods rapidly produce curved planar reformations of equivalent quality with reduced time and effort.


Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Humans , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...