Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777185

ABSTRACT

The second part of this CME article discusses sunscreen regulation and safety considerations for humans and the environment. First, we provide an overview of the history of the United States Food and Drug Administration's regulation of sunscreen. Recent Food and Drug Administration studies clearly demonstrate that organic ultraviolet filters are systemically absorbed during routine sunscreen use, but to date there is no evidence of associated negative health effects. We also review the current evidence of sunscreen's association with vitamin D levels and frontal fibrosing alopecia, and recent concerns regarding benzene contamination. Finally, we review the possible environmental effects of ultraviolet filters, particularly coral bleaching. While climate change has been shown to be the primary driver of coral bleaching, laboratory-based studies suggest that organic ultraviolet filters represent an additional contributing factor, which led several localities to ban certain organic filters.

2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 2024 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38772426

ABSTRACT

As our knowledge of the harmful effects of ultraviolet radiation continues to evolve, sunscreen remains an integral part of a comprehensive photoprotection strategy against multiple endpoints of ultraviolet-mediated damage. Part 1 of this review covers sunscreen active and additive ingredient properties, mechanisms of action and gaps in coverage. Following an overview of sunscreen's efficacy in protecting against sunburn, photocarcinogenesis, photoaging, pigmentary disorders, and idiopathic photodermatoses, we highlight considerations for product use and selection in children and individuals with skin of color.

3.
AJOG Glob Rep ; 3(1): 100157, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36748028

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the effectiveness of intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery as a contraceptive method. However, national-level use and outcomes of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery are currently understudied in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the trends, characteristics, and outcomes of patients who received a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used the National Inpatient Sample. The study cohort included patients who underwent cesarean delivery from October 2015 to December 2018. The exclusion criteria included hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, uterine anomaly, hysterectomy, and permanent surgical sterilization. Eligible cases were grouped on the basis of the use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. The primary outcome measures were temporal trends and characteristics associated with the use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery, assessed using the generalized estimating equation model in multivariable analysis. The secondary outcome measure was perioperative morbidity (leukocytosis, endometritis, myometritis, and sepsis). Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Among 2,983,978 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 10,145 patients (0.3%) received a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. The use of a postplacental intrauterine device increased from 0.1% in the fourth quarter of 2015 to 0.6% in the fourth quarter of 2018 (P<.001). In a multivariable analysis, the use of a postplacental intrauterine device increased by 14% every quarter-year (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.15). In addition, (1) patient characteristics of young age, non-White race, obesity, tobacco use, lowest quartile median household income, and insured with Medicaid; (2) hospital characteristics of large bed capacity and urban teaching setting in Northeast region; and (3) pregnancy characteristics of early gestational age at cesarean delivery, hypertensive disease, previous cesarean delivery, multifetal pregnancy, grand multiparity, placenta previa, and nonelective cesarean delivery represented the independent characteristics associated with the use of a postplacental intrauterine device (all P<.05). A regression tree model identified 35 discrete patterns of the use of a postplacental intrauterine device based on 8 factors (time, race or ethnicity, primary expected payer, obesity, hospital bed capacity, hospital teaching status, hospital region, and previous cesarean delivery). There were 9 patterns, representing 8.8% of the study population, exhibiting a use rate of ≥1.0%, whereas there were 7 patterns, representing 16.0% of the study population, exhibiting no use of a postplacental intrauterine device (absolute rate difference from the highest group to the lowest group, 4.7%). In a propensity score-matched model, postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery was not associated with increased risk of measured morbidity (any, 1.8% vs 1.7%; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.69; P=.812), including postpartum endometritis (1.2% vs 1.0%; odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-2.14; P=.554). CONCLUSION: The use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery increased significantly in recent years in the United States.

5.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 32(11): 1433-1442, 2022 11 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167437

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Surgery for placenta accreta spectrum is associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. The role of gynecologic oncologists in the surgical management of placenta accreta spectrum is currently under investigation. This study examined the practices, experiences, and interests of gynecologic oncologists in placenta accreta spectrum surgeries. METHODS: The intervention was an anonymous, cross-sectional, 20-question survey sent to 1084 members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology in the USA. RESULTS: A total of 184 gynecologic oncologists responded to the survey (response rate 17.0%). Most participating gynecologic oncologists have been practicing for >10 years after fellowship (53.2%), practice in urban-teaching hospitals (84.8%) with delivery volumes ≥3000/year (54.3%), and have a multidisciplinary approach (82.5%). Three-quarters (78.7%) feel that the rate of placenta accreta spectrum is increasing over time. One-third (35.5%) perform ≥6 hysterectomies for placenta accreta spectrum yearly. Less than half (45.5%) practice conservative management. Approximately half are involved from the beginning of the case (49.7%) and perform the surgery in the main operating room (59.4%). Almost three-quarters (71.6%) have experienced surgical blood loss >5 L and one-third (36.6%) have experienced cases with blood loss >10 L. About half (50.3%) of participants are interested in placenta accreta spectrum surgery for future practice. Gynecologic oncologists engaging in a multidisciplinary approach are more likely to practice in an urban-teaching hospital, have higher surgical volume, be involved from the beginning of the case, and be interested in placenta accreta spectrum surgery. Those >10 years post-training and in the Southern US region are more likely to practice conservative management or delayed hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: This society-based cross-sectional survey suggests that gynecologic oncologists are actively involved in the surgical management of placenta accreta spectrum in the USA. Nearly half of gynecologic oncologists who responded to the survey expressed interest in surgery for placenta accreta spectrum.


Subject(s)
Oncologists , Placenta Accreta , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Placenta Accreta/surgery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Hysterectomy
6.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 273: 59-64, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35487095

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The association between early surgical menopause and increased mortality has been well demonstrated. Prior studies have also demonstrated that ovarian conservation is not associated with worse oncologic outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. This study examined the contemporary trends and characteristics of ovarian conservation at time of hysterectomy in young women with cervical cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study examining the National Inpatient Sample. The study population was 4900 women aged ≤50 years with cervical cancer who had hysterectomy-based surgical treatment from 10/2015 to 12/2018. The exposure allocation was the adnexal procedure status (ovarian conservation versus oophorectomy). The main outcome measures were temporal trends of ovarian conservation over time and per patient age. Multivariable binary logistic regression model was fitted to identify independent characteristics associated with ovarian conservation. A classification-tree was constructed by recursive partitioning analysis to examine the utilization patterns of ovarian conservation. RESULTS: A total of 2,940 (60.0%) women underwent ovarian conservation at hysterectomy. Ovarian conservation rates remained stable until age 37 years, ranging from 82.5% to 77.9% (P = 0.502), after which time the rate sharply and significantly decreased by 7.4% (95% confidence interval 5.4-9.3, P < 0.001) in one-year age increments from 77.9% at age 37 years to 28.7% at age 50 years. The rate of ovarian conservation increased from 54.7% in Q4/2015 to 64.4% in Q4/2018 (P = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, recent surgery remained an independent factor for ovarian conservation (adjusted-odds ratio per year-quarter 1.04, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.06). A classification-tree model identified 24 unique patterns of ovarian conservation based on patient factor (age, race/ethnicity, primary expected payer, and year of surgery), surgical factor (minimally invasive hysterectomy), and facility factor (hospital bed capacity and region), ranging from <20% to 90% (absolute percentage difference, >80%). CONCLUSION: Increasing rates of ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy in women undergoing surgical management of cervical cancer is encouraging; however, the marked decrease noted in patients in their mid-30s as well as substantial variability in ovarian conservation based on patient, surgical, and hospital factors are striking and warrant further consideration in clinical practice guidelines.


Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adult , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Ovariectomy , Ovary/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery
7.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 272: 240-246, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35405452

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: An inverse relationship between hospital volume and adverse patient outcomes has been established for many conditions, but has not yet been examined in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Given the rarity of severe OHSS, but potential for high morbidity, this study aimed to elucidate the effect of hospital volume on inpatient OHSS-related complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study querying the National Inpatient Sample, 1/2001-12/2011. Study population was 11,878 patients with OHSS treated at 735 hospitals. Annualized hospital OHSS treatment volume was grouped as: low-volume (1 case/year), mid-volume (>1 but < 3.5 cases/year), and high-volume (≥3.5 cases/year). Main outcome measure was major complication rates stratified by hospital treatment volume, assessed by multinomial regression and binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 2,415 (20.3%) patients were treated at low-volume centers, 5,023 (42.3%) at mid-volume centers, and 4,440 (37.4%) at high-volume centers. Patients treated at high-volume centers were more likely to be older and less comorbid with higher incomes and lower body mass index (P < 0.05). High-volume hospitals were more likely to be urban-teaching centers with large bed capacity (P < 0.001). Overall, 1,624 (13.7%) patients experienced a major complication during hospitalization. Patients treated at high-volume hospitals had lower rates of major complications (high: 11.0%, mid: 15.2%, low: 15.6%, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, treatment at high-volume hospitals was independently associated with a nearly 20% lower rate of major complications (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.97, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that higher hospital treatment volume for OHSS may be associated with improved outcomes.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/adverse effects , Hospitalization , Hospitals , Humans , Odds Ratio , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/complications , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/etiology , Ovulation Induction/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies
8.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 306(3): 865-874, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35235021

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine incidence and characteristics of women who developed secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer. METHODS: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program from 1973 to 2013. Women with uterine cancer who did not have synchronous or a history of breast cancer were followed after their uterine cancer diagnosis (N = 236,561). A time-dependent competing risk analysis was performed to examine cumulative incidences and clinico-pathological characteristics of those who subsequently developed breast cancer. RESULTS: There were 7110 (3.0%) women who developed secondary breast cancers after uterine cancer with 5-, 10-, and 20-year cumulative incidence rates of 1.5, 2.8, and 4.7%, respectively. The increase in the rate of secondary breast cancer was particularly high in the first 3 years after a uterine cancer diagnosis (annual percent change [APC] 4.9), followed by 3-7 years (APC 1.6) after diagnosis (P < 0.001). The median time to develop secondary breast cancer was 6.4 years. Older women had significantly shorter time intervals between uterine and breast cancer diagnoses (3.7 years for aged > 71, 5.9 for aged 64-71, 7.6 for aged 56-63, and 9.4 for aged < 56, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, older age, White race, married status, endometrioid, serous, and mixed histology types, and early-stage tumors remained as independent factors of developing secondary breast cancer (all, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tumor factors with endometrioid and serous histology types and early-stage disease were the factors associated with secondary breast cancer after uterine cancer diagnosis. Older women had shorter time to develop secondary breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Uterine Neoplasms , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Neoplasms/complications , Uterine Neoplasms/epidemiology
9.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 306(3): 913-920, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35072782

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine trends, characteristics, and outcomes of women with placenta percreta who had conservative management at cesarean delivery (CD) without hysterectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study querying the National Inpatient Sample. The Study population was comprised of women with diagnosis of placenta percreta who underwent CD from 10/2015-12/2018. Characteristics and surgical outcome of women who had hysterectomy at time of CD were compared to those who did not (conservative management) in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1055 cases were examined, of which 790 (74.9%) received hysterectomy at CD and the remaining 265 (25.1%) had conservative management without hysterectomy. During the study period, performance of hysterectomy at CD increased from 71.4% to 93.8% (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, more recent cases of CD for placenta percreta were less likely to have conservative management [adjusted-odds ratio (aOR) per year-quarter 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-0.97]. In contrast, hospitals with small-medium bed capacity (aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.18-2.51), non-urban teaching setting (aOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.14-2.70), and located in the Midwest (aOR 2.55, 95% CI 1.56-4.17) were more likely to offer conservative management at CD. Later gestational age was also associated with a higher likelihood of conservative management (median gestational age, 36 versus 34 weeks, P < 0.001). Women in the conservative management group experienced lower measured surgical morbidity during the admission compared to those in the cesarean hysterectomy group (47.2% versus 75.9%, aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.26-0.48). CONCLUSION: The clinical practice for placenta percreta appears to be shifting to upfront hysterectomy at the time of CD.


Subject(s)
Placenta Accreta , Adult , Cesarean Section , Conservative Treatment , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Infant , Placenta Accreta/epidemiology , Placenta Accreta/surgery , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
10.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 305(2): 483-493, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34241687

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of body habitus on risk of complications resulting from ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in hospitalized patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study examining the National Inpatient Sample between January 2012 and September 2015. Patients were women < 50 years of age diagnosed with OHSS, classified as non-obese, class I-II obesity, or class III obesity. Intervention included multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with obesity and binary logistic regression for independent risk factors for complications. Main outcome measures were incidence of (i) any or (ii) multiple complication(s). RESULTS: Of 2745 women hospitalized with OHSS, 2440 (88.9%) were non-obese, 155 (5.6%) had class I-II obesity, and 150 (5.5%) had class III obesity. Obese women (either class I-II or III) had a higher degree of comorbidity, had lower incomes, and were less likely to have private insurance than non-obese women (all P < 0.001). Obese women had lower rates of OHSS-related complications than non-obese women (any complication: non-obese 65.2%, class I-II 54.8%, and class III 46.7%, P < 0.001; and multiple complications: non-obese 38.5%, class I-II 32.3%, and class III 20.0%, P < 0.001). In the multivariable model, obesity remained independently associated with a decreased risk of complications (class I-II odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.83, P = 0.003; class III odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.44, P < 0.001). Obese women were also less likely to require paracentesis (non-obese 32.8%, class I-II 9.7%, and class III 13.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that obesity is associated with decreased OHSS-related complication rates in hospitalized patients.


Subject(s)
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Incidence , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/complications , Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
13.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 46(8): 1263-1281, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32500605

ABSTRACT

AIM: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) can be a devastating diagnosis in women of reproductive age who desire future fertility. However, in early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) can be considered in appropriately selected patients. METHODS: This is a narrative descriptive review of the recent literature on FSS for EOC from oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives. RESULTS: The recurrence rate following FSS performed for stage I EOC in published retrospective studies collectively is 13% but ranges from 5 to 29%, while mortality ranges from 0 to 18%. Five-year disease-free survival following FSS is over 90% but decreases with higher stage and grade. Recurrences following FSS are more likely to be localized with a more favorable prognosis compared to recurrences following radical surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in women with high-risk disease, and strategies to minimize gonadotoxicity during chemotherapy such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be considered. Oocyte, embryo and/or ovarian cryopreservation can also be offered to patients desiring future biologic children. Reproductive outcomes following FSS, including pregnancy and miscarriage rates, resemble those of the general population, with a chance of successful pregnancy of nearly 80%. CONCLUSION: In retrospective data, FSS appears to be oncologically safe in stage IA and IC grade 1-2 non-clear cell EOC. In patients with grade 3 tumors or clear cell histology, treatment can be individualized, weighing a slightly higher risk of recurrence with fertility goals. A multidisciplinary approach with oncology and reproductive endocrinology may be of utility to help these patients achieve their fertility goals.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Ovarian Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...