A Study of the Potential Interaction Between Bazedoxifene and Atorvastatin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women.

An open-label, 3-period study was conducted in 30 healthy postmenopausal women (mean age, 58.4 years) who received a single oral dose of atorvastatin 20 mg on day 1 (period 1), multiple daily dosing of bazedoxifene 40 mg on days 4-11 (period 2), and coadministration of atorvastatin 20 mg + bazedoxifene 40 mg on day 12 (period 3). Serial blood samples were collected (24 hours after bazedoxifene and 72 hours after atorvastatin) and assayed for bazedoxifene, atorvastatin, and its ortho-hydroxy and para-hydroxy metabolites. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Bazedoxifene exposure was not altered with coadministration of atorvastatin 20 mg (Cmax and AUCss were within bioequivalence limits). Similarly, atorvastatin and ortho-hydroxyatorvastatin exposure was equivalent with or without coadministration with bazedoxifene. Para-hydroxyatorvastatin concentrations were below the limit of quantitation under both conditions. Cmax for atorvastatin and ortho-hydroxyatorvastatin was 14% and 18% lower, respectively, and Tmax was 20% and 34% longer, respectively, with the combination compared with atorvastatin alone. There were no serious adverse events, and no subjects discontinued the study because of safety. No clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between bazedoxifene and atorvastatin or its active metabolites, indicating they may be safely coadministered without dosage adjustment.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Bazedoxifene in Hepatically Impaired and Healthy Postmenopausal Women.

Bazedoxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator with proestrogenic effects on bone and lipid metabolism and antiestrogenic effects on the breast and endometrium, is a treatment option for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. It is extensively metabolized by the liver; therefore, a decrease in liver function was expected to decrease bazedoxifene clearance. This single-dose, open-label, inpatient/outpatient, nonrandomized study assessed the pharmacokinetics of bazedoxifene 20 mg in 18 postmenopausal women with hepatic impairment and 18 matched healthy postmenopausal women. Bazedoxifene elimination was slower, and exposure was higher, in hepatically impaired subjects compared with healthy subjects. In subjects with severe (Child-Pugh C) liver impairment, bazedoxifene mean half-life was 50% longer than that of healthy subjects. Area under the concentration-time curve geometric mean ratios (90%CI) for Child-Pugh A, B, and C liver impairment vs healthy subjects were 243% (156-379), 209% (135-326), and 368% (236-572), respectively. Although there were no severe adverse events in this study, bazedoxifene use in patients with hepatic impairment is not recommended.

Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study of Bazedoxifene and Ibuprofen.

The purpose of this article was to evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between bazedoxifene and ibuprofen. In a randomized crossover study, 12 healthy postmenopausal women (aged 45-65 years) received either a single oral dose of ibuprofen (600-mg tablet), bazedoxifene (20-mg capsule), or both ibuprofen and bazedoxifene during the 3 treatment periods. Serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. There was no relationship between the UGT1A1 genotype and bazedoxifene clearance. The 90% log-transformed confidence intervals (CIs) for bazedoxifene Cmax , 96% to 144%, and AUC, 85% to 134%, were slightly above the bioequivalence limits of 80% to 125%. The 90% log-transformed CIs for ibuprofen pharmacokinetic parameters were within these limits (Cmax , 92%-122%; AUC, 94%-106%). The increase in bazedoxifene plasma concentrations when combined with ibuprofen versus bazedoxifene alone is unlikely to be clinically significant. The lack of interaction between bazedoxifene and ibuprofen suggests that they may be coadministered without dose adjustment.

An open-label, single-dose, parallel-group study of the effects of chronic hepatic impairment on the safety and pharmacokinetics of desvenlafaxine.

BACKGROUND: Many antidepressants are extensively metabolized in the liver, requiring dose adjustments in individuals with hepatic impairment. Clinical studies indicate that the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor desvenlafaxine is metabolized primarily via glucuronidation, and ∼45% is eliminated unchanged in urine. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to assess the pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and tolerability of desvenlafaxine in adults with chronic Child-Pugh class A, B, and C hepatic impairment. METHODS: Subjects (aged 18-65 years) with mild (Child-Pugh class A, n = 8), moderate (Child-Pugh class B, n = 8), and severe (Child-Pugh class C, n = 8) hepatic impairment and 12 healthy matched subjects received a single 100-mg oral dose of desvenlafaxine. Disposition of (R)-, (S)-, and (R+S)-enantiomers of desvenlafaxine were examined in plasma and urine. Geometric least squares (GLS) mean ratios and 90% CIs for AUC, AUC0-τ, Cmax, and Cl/F were calculated; comparisons were made by using a 1-factor ANOVA. Safety was evaluated according to adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, and laboratory assessments. RESULTS: Healthy participants had a mean age of 51 years (range, 36-62 years) and weight of 79.1 kg (range, 52.5-105.0 kg); hepatically impaired participants had a mean age of 52 years (range, 31-65 years) and weight of 80.9 kg (range, 50.2-119.5 kg). In both groups, 67% of participants were male. No statistically significant differences (≥50%) in the disposition of desvenlafaxine were detected between hepatically impaired patients and healthy subjects based on GLS mean ratios for Cmax, AUC0-τ, AUC, or Cl/F (P > 0.05 for each comparison). Median Tmax was similar for all groups (range, 6-9 hours). A nonsignificant increase was observed for desvenlafaxine exposure in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (GLS mean ratios [90% CIs] for AUC, 31% [93.2-184], 35% [96.5-190], respectively). The most common adverse events were nausea (n = 2, healthy subjects; n = 3, hepatically impaired subjects) and vomiting (n = 1, healthy subjects; n = 2, hepatically impaired subjects). CONCLUSIONS: A single 100-mg dose of desvenlafaxine was well tolerated in healthy subjects and hepatically impaired patients. A mild increase in exposure was observed for moderate and severe hepatically impaired subjects (Child-Pugh class B and C).

Pharmacokinetics and safety of a single intravenous dose of the antibiotic tigecycline in patients with cirrhosis.

Tigecycline belongs to a new class of tetracyclines, the glycylcyclines, less than 20% of which is metabolized in the liver. Twenty-five patients with cirrhosis with varying degrees of functional hepatic reserve (Child-Pugh A, n = 10; B, n = 10; C, n = 5) and 23 healthy adults, matched by age, sex, weight, and smoking habits, received 100 mg of tigecycline infused intravenously over 60 minutes. Serum and urine samples were collected up to 120 hours after dosing. Pharmacokinetic data were derived using noncompartmental methods. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in healthy volunteers were nausea (56.5%), vomiting (21.7%), and headache (21.7%) and in the patients with cirrhosis, albuminuria (12%). Mean (± 1 SD) tigecycline clearance values were 29.8 ± 11.3 L/h in healthy subjects and 31.2 ± 13.9 L/h (Child-Pugh A), 22.1 ± 9.3 L/h (Child-Pugh B), and 13.5 ± 2.7 L/h (Child-Pugh C) in the patients. A single intravenous dose of tigecycline 100 mg was safe and well-tolerated in patients with cirrhosis with varying degrees of hepatic functional reserve. No adjustment of tigecycline maintenance dosage is warranted in patients with compensated or moderately decompensated cirrhosis; doses should be reduced by 50%, to 25 mg, every 12 hours in patients with severely decompensated disease.