ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken with the following aims and objectives. a) To determine the prevalence of diabetes. b) To compare the prevalence of newly diagnosed diabetic subjects, diagnosed by the ADA and WHO criteria. c) To determine to what extent prevalence rates are affected by gender, age and body mass index. METHODS: The study population consisted of 520 subjects aged 20 years and above selected by random sampling. Blood glucose both fasting and post glucose (75 gms) two hours sample were analyzed. Baseline clinical data like height, weight and blood pressure were recorded. Known cases of diabetes were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes (fasting blood glucose) as per WHO criteria was 4.61% while it was 7.5% as per ADA criteria. The prevalence according to the two hour glucose reading was 6.15%. The mean glucose level increase with age. With increasing BMI the percentage of diabetic subjects also increases. The prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was 8.6% in subjects below 50 years and 13.4% in subjects older than 50 years. IGT values also increase with increasing age and BMI. 1.3% of subjects had normal fasting glucose level (< 126 mgm%) but high post glucose levels (> 200 mgm%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of diabetes and IGT is higher as compared to earlier studies. The mean blood glucose and IGT increase with increasing age and BMI. Several subjects had normal fasting blood glucose but increased two hour blood glucose level indicating that fasting glucose alone should not be used to diagnose DM. Urbanization and life style of residents of Dombivli contribute to the high prevalence.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Female , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , PrevalenceABSTRACT
A population-based cross-sectional study of gynaecological and sexual diseases in rural women was done in two Indian villages. Of 650 women who were studied, 55% had gynaecological complaints and 45% were symptom-free. 92% of all women were found to have one or more gynaecological or sexual diseases, and the average number of these diseases per woman was 3.6. Infections of the genital tract contributed half of this morbidity. Only 8% of the women had undergone gynaecological examination and treatment in the past. There was an association between presence of gynaecological diseases and use of female methods of contraception, but this could explain only a small fraction of the morbidity. In the rural areas of developing countries, gynaecological and sexual care should be part of primary health care.