Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Reprod Infant Psychol ; : 1-12, 2022 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36138562

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Impaired mother-infant bonding (MIB) is associated with inadequate maternal skills and pose a higher risk for impaired learning, child abuse, and psychiatric disorders in children. There are approximately 24 million births annually in India; however, community data on MIB from India is lacking. METHODS: The study reports the findings of a cross-sectional survey of 8189 mothers with children of age between 13 and 15 months from the state of Kerala, India. Bonding was assessed using the Mother-infant bonding scale (MIBS). Other correlates assessed include obstetric and birth history, chronic pain, postpartum depression and temperamental issues in the infant. RESULTS: The prevalence of impaired MIB in our sample was 12.3%. Those in extended/joint family, experiencing postpartum complications, supplementary breastfeeding in the first 6 months, postpartum depression and temperamental issues in infant were found to be associated with increased MIBS scores in a multivariate mixed-effect zero-inflated poisson model. CONCLUSION: Experience of impaired MIB is not uncommon among mothers in India. More needs to be done to explore these issues, especially among those with higher risk to ensure appropriate interventions to mitigate long-term consequences.

2.
Asian J Psychiatr ; 66: 102880, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34688015

ABSTRACT

While higher anxiety during antenatal period cause several maternal and foetal health related complications, lower anxiety levels are found to be associated with lesser "precautionary behaviours" and consequently greater risk of infection, during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we aimed to assess rates and determinants of generalized anxiety at the time of the pandemic as well as anxiety that was specific to the context of being pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic. (COVID-19-antenatal anxiety) in Indian women. This hospital-based, cross-sectional study using face-to-face interviews was conducted at antenatal clinics of five medical college hospitals in India. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD -7) and a customized scale to assess antenatal COVID-19 anxiety along with other tools that assessed social support and COVID-19-risk perception were administered to 620 pregnant women. We found that the percentage of women with moderate or severe anxiety based on GAD -7 was 11.1%. Multivariate analysis showed that higher COVID-19-risk perception, greater antenatal COVID-19 anxiety and lower perceived support significantly predicted moderate and severe generalized anxiety. Greater number of weeks of gestation, lower education, semiurban habitat and lower perceived social support were significant predictors of antenatal COVID-19 anxiety. We conclude that the rates of anxiety in pregnant women though not very high, still warrant attention and specific interventions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnant Women , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 56(12): 2263-2274, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34114109

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study examined the contributions of antenatal anxiety, depression, and partner violence to low birth weight (LBW) in infants and to sex-specific birth weight outcomes among mothers from a cohort in urban India. METHODS: Data from 700 mothers from the PRAMMS cohort (Prospective Assessment of Maternal Mental Health Study) were used. Pregnant women were assessed in each trimester-T1, T2 and T3, for symptoms of anxiety, and depression as well as partner violence. Multivariate analyses were performed for the whole sample and then for male and female infants separately. The final multivariable logistic regression models were each built using a backward selection procedure and controlling for confounders. To accommodate longitudinally measured data, change in scores (T2-T1 and T3-T2) of anxiety and depression were included in the model. RESULTS: Of the 583 women with a singleton live birth, birth weight was available for 514 infants  and LBW was recorded in 80 infants (15.6%). Of these, 23 infants were preterm. Overall, higher T1 Depression scores (OR: 1.11; 95% CI 1.040, 1.187) and an increase in both Depression scores (OR: 1.12; 95% CI 1.047, 1.195) from T1 to T2 and Anxiety scores (OR: 1.32; 95% CI 1.079, 1.603) between T2 and T3 were predictors of LBW. Female infants had a higher chance of LBW with increase in maternal anxiety between T1-T2 (OR: 1.69; 95% CI 1.053, 2.708) and T2-T3 (OR: 1.49; 95% CI 1.058, 2.086); partner violence during pregnancy just failed to reach conventional statistical significance (OR: 2.48; 95% CI 0.810, 7.581) in girls. Male infants had a higher chance of LBW with higher baseline depression scores at T1 (OR: 1.23; 95% CI 1.042, 1.452) and an increase in depression scores (OR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.060, 1.472) from T1 to T2. CONCLUSION: Increasing prenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms in different trimesters of pregnancy were associated with LBW with sex-specific patterns of association in this sample from a Low and Middle Income Country.


Subject(s)
Depression , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 24(4): 687-692, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641004

ABSTRACT

Studies in western cultures have proposed mechanisms by which adverse childhood experiences can affect mental health, including mediating variables such as social support and resilience. However, research replicating these findings in perinatal populations are sparse in Asia. This study assessed the association between lifetime trauma and postpartum depressive symptoms. Additionally, the study examined the mediating role that resilience and social support can play in this association. This study was conducted on 458 women participating in the PRAMMS cohort in urban Bangalore. Information on lifetime trauma was collected through a culturally appropriate trauma interview and postpartum depressive symptoms (8 weeks) were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Resilience was assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 and social support was assessed through the Zimet's Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. A linear model was used to measure the association between lifetime trauma and postpartum depression and mediation analysis was used to assess the role of resilience and social support in the primary association. All analyses were conducted using SPSS. In this cohort, 254 women reported at least one trauma and 204 reported no trauma. A higher number of lifetime traumatic events was associated with higher EPDS scores (ß = 0.487, 95%CI: 0.267-0.707). Social support was found to have a negative association between the predictor and the outcome; however, resilience was not a statistically significant mediator. Lifetime trauma was associated with postpartum depressive symptoms in our study and social support negatively mediated the association between lifetime trauma and postpartum depressive symptoms.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum , Depression , Depression/epidemiology , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/epidemiology , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Social Support
5.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0242865, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33253251

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study examined the prevalence, sociodemographic, and clinical correlates of chronic pain among primary care patients in the state of Kerala, India. It also examined the patterns and relationships of chronic physical and mental health conditions with chronic pain. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional survey conducted among 7165 adult patients selected randomly by a multi-stage stratified design from 71 primary health centers. The questionnaires administered included Chronic pain screening questionnaire, self-reported Chronic physical health condition checklist, Patient Health Questionnaire-SADS, The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule and WHOQOL- BREF for Quality/Satisfaction with Life. The prevalence and comorbid patterns of chronic pain were determined. Logistic regression analysis and generalized linear mixed-effects model was employed to examine the relationship of chronic pain to socio-demographic variables and examined physical and mental health conditions. RESULTS: A total of 1831 (27%) patients reported chronic pain. Among those with chronic pain, 28.3% reported no co-occurring chronic mental or physical illness, 35.3% reported one, and 36.3% reported multi-morbidity. In the multivariate analysis, patients with chronic pain when compared to those without had higher odds of being older, female, having lower education, not living with their family, greater disability, and poor satisfaction with life. Chronic pain was independently associated with both medical (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, arthritis, and other medical illnesses) and mental health conditions (depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and tobacco dependence). It showed a varying strength of association and additive effect with increasing number of co-occurring physical and mental illnesses. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain is a common condition among primary care attendees associated with significant burden of medical and mental health comorbidity. The findings highlight the need to incorporate treatment models that will ensure appropriate management to improve outcomes within the resource constraints.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/physiopathology , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , India/epidemiology , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Patient Health Questionnaire , Primary Health Care , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Can J Psychiatry ; 65(11): 779-789, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32452212

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A substantial proportion of severely ill patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and are unable to practice cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on an out-patient basis. We report the short-term (at discharge) and long-term (up to 2 years) outcome of a multimodal inpatient treatment program that included therapist-assisted intensive CBT with adjunctive pharmacotherapy for severely ill OCD patients who are often resistant to SRIs and are either unresponsive or unable to practice outpatient CBT. METHODS: A total of 420 patients, admitted between January 2012 and December 2017 were eligible for the analysis. They were evaluated using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. All patients received 4 to 5 therapist-assisted CBT sessions per week along with standard pharmacotherapy. Naturalistic follow-up information at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were recorded. RESULTS: At baseline, patients were mostly severely ill (YBOCS = 29.9 ± 4.5) and nonresponsive to ≥2 SRIs (83%). Mean duration of inpatient stay was 42.7 ± 25.3 days. At discharge, there was a significant decline in the mean YBOCS score (29.9 ± 4.5 vs. 18.1 ± 7.7, P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.64); 211/420 (50%) were responders (≥35% YBOCS reduction and CGI-I≤2) and an additional 86/420 (21%) were partial responders (25% to 35% YBOCS reduction and CGI-I≤3). Using latent class growth modeling of the follow-up data, 4 distinct classes were identified, which include "remitters" (14.5%), "responders" (36.5%), "minimal responders" (34.7%), and "nonresponders" (14.6%). Shorter duration of illness, better insight, and lesser contamination/washing symptoms predicted better response in both short- and long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Intensive, inpatient-based care for OCD may be an effective option for patients with severe OCD and should be considered routinely in those who do not respond with outpatient treatment.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Humans , Inpatients , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Treatment Outcome
7.
Arch Womens Ment Health ; 22(6): 759-770, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31529275

ABSTRACT

Integrating gender in all aspects of health services is important and mental health is no exception. Despite several recommendations regarding the need for gender-sensitive mental health services, the actual availability of these is not clear, both in high and low-income countries. We sought to understand what aspects of gender-sensitive mental health care were considered a priority by global experts in women's mental health and how satisfied they were with the current availability of these services in their own place of work. A survey with 43 items under 7 domains of gender-sensitive mental health care for women was sent to 150 experts in women's mental health across the world, of whom 73 responded. Rating on each item was from 0 to 5. While majority of the experts rated most of the items as being very important (median score of 4 and above), some areas that were considered most important included training of mental health professionals in gender sensitivity, having private spaces for examination, using a life course approach to service planning and delivery, and assisting women who find it difficult to navigate the system and mother-baby units. However, satisfaction rates with available services were quite low overall and much lower among experts in low-income countries compared with those from high-income countries. Even in high-income countries, only 6 of the top 20 items were scored as satisfactory by at least 50% of experts. This expert survey method to arrive at consensus on top priorities for improving delivery of gender-sensitive mental health care indicates that at least 72% of the items provided in the survey were considered extremely important. Poor satisfaction of experts in both high- and low-income countries with availability of gender-sensitive services indicates the need for local and global strategic action and multilevel stakeholder engagement.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/standards , Mental Health Services/standards , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Women's Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...