Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Nepal Health Res Counc ; 20(3): 683-688, 2023 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36974857

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Point prevalence survey on antibiotic use developed by WHO are already in use in acute care hospitals around the world. The aim of this study was to collect prescribing of antibiotics using Point prevalence survey method in KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital. METHODS: This was a cross sectional descriptive study and data collection was completed within 8 working days in the study site. The study was conducted among inpatients admitted at or before 8:00AM on the day of survey in various wards. Patient sampling was done as per the Point Prevalence Survey methodology. Data analysis was done and presented as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: Out of 32 patients, maximum patients were of age group 20-30 years and 19 (59%) patients were females. Most patients, 8 (32%) were from the surgery ward. There were patients from 8 different wards including a patient who had renal transplant. Blood, sputum, urine and CSF culture were done in 11 patients, only 2 urine cultures were positive. At least one antibiotic was used among 18 patients. Ceftriaxone (34.4%) was maximally used followed by levofloxacin (3%). One or two antibiotics were used in prophylaxis with a duration of one to five days. CONCLUSIONS: WHO Point prevalence survey methodology has been used in this study. Ceftriaxone was the most commonly used antibiotics. Parenteral administration was the commonest method of administration. At least one antibiotic was used among 18 patients. There is presence of a functioning Drugs and Therapeutics Committee, Infection Prevention and Control Committee and committee on pharmacovigilance. However, many indicators for hospital infrastructure, policy and practice and monitoring and feedback were not present.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Ceftriaxone , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ceftriaxone/therapeutic use , Tertiary Care Centers , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Nepal/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 59(242): 983-986, 2021 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35199687

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The world has been threatened with the emergence of the Novel Corona Virus straining the health care system and creating a global pandemic. This is not the first pandemic, and it certainly will not be the last to affect humanity. As the medical community is exposed to these highly contagious new diseases with arrays of symptoms like fever, cough, shortness of breath, anosmia, insomnia, and myalgia. Back pain can also be considered as one of the symptoms of COVID-19 infection. Therefore, this study aimed to find out the prevalence of back pain among the Health care workers who were tested positive for COVID-19 by the end of their isolation period. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was done from April 2021 to June 2021 in KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Imadol, Lalitpur, Nepal, after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Registration number: 2077/078/57). Convenience sampling was done. Data collection and entry were done in Microsoft excel, point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data. RESULTS: Out of 156 COVID-19 positive patients, the prevalence of back pain was seen among 64 (41%) patients (95% Confidence Interval= 42.23-57.75). Among them 21 (32.8%) were males and 43 (67.2%) were females. Likewise, the minimum age was 20 years and the maximum was 68 years with a mean of 33.5±10.28. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a high proportion of healthcare workers were suffering from back pain and the findings are similar to the data from other international studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Back Pain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Male , Nepal/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
3.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 57(220): 393-497, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32335647

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is a common metabolic bone disease characterized by increased bone fragility, yet underdiagnosed and undertreated. With the increase in longevity of the populace, it is becoming an urgent and serious global epidemic. This being a preventable disease, has no clinical manifestations until there is a fracture. Early diagnosis and treatment are of dire necessity. Hence the aim of our study is to find the prevalence of osteoporosis among adults attending a tertiary care hospital-based on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was done in a tertiary care hospital, from 15th July 2019 to 15th October 2019 after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Registration number: 2075 / 76 / 119). Convenient sampling was done. Data collection and entry was done in Microsoft excel, point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data. RESULTS: Out of 464 participants the overall prevalence of osteoporosis was 38 (8.2%) at a 95% confidence interval (5.7-10.7). Among the participants, 141 (30.4%) were male and 323 (69.6%) were female. The mean age of the participant was 41.02±14.96 years. Osteoporosis was more common in the older age group 11.66 (30.7%) in 60 years above Women were found to be more osteoporotic than men, 3.42 (9.0%) and 2.43 (6.4%) respectively. Bone mineral density and osteoporosis had a bimodal distribution, underweight 5.01 (13.2%) and obese group 5.32 (14.0%) were the two peaks. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of osteoporosis in our study is high and is consistent with other South Asian studies. Early detection of osteoporosis using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound can be a good screening tool.


Subject(s)
Calcaneus/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Adult , Bone Density , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nepal/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Prevalence , Sex Distribution , Tertiary Care Centers , Thinness/epidemiology , Ultrasonography
4.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 56(211): 640-645, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30381755

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bedside teaching is an important and established learning tool in medical education. However there is a decline in bedside teachings over the years throughout the world including Nepal, due to advancement in medical technology, clinical skills labs and simulation techniques. This study aimed to find out the perception of Nepalese medical students towards different domains of bedside teaching. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. A questionnaire consisting of Likert scale, open ended and closed ended questions was developed on different aspect of bedside teaching and the filled questionnaires were included for analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred and six questionnaires were included. Almost all of medical students responded that bedside teaching is a useful learning modality in clinical teaching 304 (99.3%) and provides active learning in real context 291 (95%). The majority of medical students 233 (76%) were satisfied with the steps of history taking, examination followed by management discussion employed at bedside teaching. The students 223 (73%) were satisfied, how to elicit signs following demonstration of clinical exam by teachers at bedside. However majority 196 (64%) felt lack of individual opportunity at bedside. According to students, focussing more on practically oriented clinical skills with proper supervision would improve learning while hindering factors were large number of students and patient's uncooperativeness. Good communication was considered the best method of alleviating patient discomfort at bedside teaching in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that medical students have positive response and learning attitudes towards different aspects of bedside teaching.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Students, Medical/psychology , Adult , Clinical Competence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Nepal , Schools, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Acta ortop. bras ; 17(2): 58-61, 2009. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-515941

ABSTRACT

Apresentamos aqui um caso de tumor de células gigantes na extremidade distal do fêmur direito tratado com ressecção da massa tumoral em bloco com remoção aguda da extremidade proximal e distal e fixado com hastes longas em K atravessando o joelho, do fêmur à tíbia. Após a consolidação / união completa das extremidades, foi feita a remoção da haste em K, seguida pela corticotomia juntamente com a osteogênese da distração com o auxílio do anel fixador de Ilizarov. O comprimento foi alcançado com este processo. O resultado final foi muito bom neste caso. Revisamos as opções de tratamento para tumor maligno de células gigantes na extremidade distal do fêmur e as dificuldades de tratá-lo.


We present a case of malignant giant cell tumor of distal end of right femur treated with resection of the tumor mass en block with acute docking of proximal and distal end and fixed with long K-nail across knee from femur to tibia. After complete consolidation/ union of the ends, removal of K nail was done followed by corticotomy along with distraction osteogenesis with the help of Ilizarov ring fixator. The length was achieved with this process. The end result was very good in this case. We reviewed the treatment options for malignant giant cell tumor of femoral distal end and the challenges in its treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Knee Joint , Giant Cells/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/diagnosis , Bone Neoplasms/physiopathology , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , Ilizarov Technique/rehabilitation , Femur/physiopathology , Femur , Distal Myopathies/diagnosis
6.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 9: 167, 2008 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19099569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is by far the most prevalent and costly musculoskeletal problem in our society today. Following the recommendations of the Multinational Musculoskeletal Inception Cohort Study (MMICS) Statement, our study aims to define outcome assessment tools for patients with acute LBP and the time point at which chronic LBP becomes manifest and to identify patient characteristics which increase the risk of chronicity. METHODS: Patients with acute LBP will be recruited from clinics of general practitioners (GPs) in New Zealand (NZ) and Switzerland (CH). They will be assessed by postal survey at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months follow-up. Primary outcome will be disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); key secondary endpoints will be general health as measured by the acute SF-12 and pain as measured on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A subgroup analysis of different assessment instruments and baseline characteristics will be performed using multiple linear regression models. This study aims to examine: 1. Which biomedical, psychological, social, and occupational outcome assessment tools are identifiers for the transition from acute to chronic LBP and at which time point this transition becomes manifest. 2. Which psychosocial and occupational baseline characteristics like work status and period of work absenteeism influence the course from acute to chronic LBP. 3. Differences in outcome assessment tools and baseline characteristics of patients in NZ compared with CH. DISCUSSION: This study will develop a screening tool for patients with acute LBP to be used in GP clinics to access the risk of developing chronic LBP. In addition, biomedical, psychological, social, and occupational patient characteristics which influence the course from acute to chronic LBP will be identified. Furthermore, an appropriate time point for follow-ups will be given to detect this transition. The generalizability of our findings will be enhanced by the international perspective of this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: [Clinical Trial Registration Number, ACTRN12608000520336].


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Absenteeism , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Cohort Studies , Employment , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/trends , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/trends , Prospective Studies , Psychology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/trends , Switzerland , Young Adult
7.
Indian J Orthop ; 41(4): 286-9, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21139779

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A clinico-epidemiological study helps to plan future preventive measures and management strategies for spinal trauma. This is a 10 years' retrospective review of spinal-injury patients treated at a tertiary health center in the eastern of Nepal to determine clinico-epidemiological aspects of spinal-injury patients in a predominantly rural population of eastern Nepal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All medical record files of patients with spinal injury from 1996 to 2005 in the Medical Record Section of BPKIHS (B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences) were studied. The preformed pro forma consisting age, sex, place of living, mode of injury, hospital stay level of injury, site of injury, associated injury, Frankel grading of neural deficit and treatment modality was filled from the record files of patients. These parameters were entered in Excel 8 and analyzed by EPI INFO 2002. Details of 896 patients of spinal injury were recorded in the 10-year period of review. RESULTS: 684 (76.35%) male and 212 (23.66%) female patients with mean age of 41.74 ± 16.53 years and 38.56 ± 15.86 years respectively were studied. Two hundred forty-two (27%) patients were from hilly districts of eastern Nepal. Fall from height [in 350 (39%) patients] was the commonest mode of spinal injury. Six hundred thirty-six (71%) patients presented with a neurological deficit. Seven hundred thirty-three (85%) patients were treated conservatively, compared to 163 (15%) surgically treated patients. One hundred forty-six (22%) patients were treated with operative interventions in the last five years. CONCLUSION: The study shows that the most vulnerable group for spine injury was the group of patients of productive age with late presentation (i.e., injury hospital duration - 41.64 ± 54.24 hours) without proper prehospital management. The treatment modalities have changed (from conservative to surgical) in this part of the world. These specific observations help us in further planning for preventive measures and management in our setting.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...