Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography.

Background: The transfemoral (TF) arterial approach is still the most commonly used approach for performing diagnostic coronary angiography in most centers in the world as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Recently, the transradial (TR) arterial approach has gained more and more supporters among interventional cardiologists. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the duration of the procedure, the amount of delivered ionizing radiation, the amount of applied contrast agent, the frequency of procedural complications and patient comfort during coronary angiography performed via TR and TF arterial approach. Methods: The total sample of 240 respondents was divided into two groups in such a way that the first group consisted of 121 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TR arterial approach, and the second group consisted of 119 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TF arterial approach. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to verify the research objective. Results: The obtained research results showed that the duration of coronary angiography and the amount of radiation was greater when using TR arterial approach compared to TF approach. There is no statistically significant difference in relation to the amount of applied contrast medium and the frequency of complications between the two approaches. Periprocedural and postprocedural comfort was better in patents who underwent TR approach. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TR arterial approach is as safe for the patient as diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TF arterial approach. With both approaches, there is no significant difference in the amount of contrast agent used nor in the frequency of complications. Procedure duration and radiation exposure are shorter when TF arterial approach i used, while patient comfort is better when the TR arterial approach is used.

Prognostic value of a decrease in mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, and platelet-large cell ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation: An observational study.

The current study aimed to explore whether the level of decrease in platelet distribution width (PDW), platelet-large cell ratio (P-LCR), and mean platelet volume (MPV) has prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) treated with clopidogrel. In this prospective observational cohort study, PDW, P-LCR, and MPV were determined on admission at the hospital and 24 h after clopidogrel treatment in 170 non-STEMI patients. MACEs were assessed over a one-year follow-up period. Using the Cox regression test, a decrease in PDW showed a significant association with the incidence of MACEs (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.99, p = 0.049) and overall survival rate (OR 0.95, 95% CI = 0.91-0.99, p = 0.016). Patients with a decrease in PDW<9.9% had a higher incidence of MACEs (OR 0.42, 95% CI = 0.24-0.72, p = 0.002) and a lower survival rate (OR 0.32, 95% CI = 0.12-0.90, p = 0.03) than patients who had a decrease in PDW < 9.9%. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis using log-rank test, patients who had a decrease in PDW < 9.9% had an increased risk for MACEs (p = 0.002) and lethal outcomes (p = 0.002). However, a decrease in MPV or P-LCR did not have prognostic value. A decrease in PDW < 9.9% measured 24 h after clopidogrel treatment in NSTEMI patients has good prognostic value for determining the short-term risks of MACEs, possibly providing a better risk stratification of those patients.

Risk Factors in Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

INTRODUCTION: The most common cause of myocardial ischemia is atherosclerotic epicardial coronary artery disease, present in 90% of patients. Risk factors positively correlate with the onset, development and subsequent complications of atherosclerotic disease. AIM: Determine the percentage frequency of classic risk factors for coronary disease in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), with regard to gender. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 600 respondents, treated for NSTEMI at the Clinic for Internal Medicine of the University Clinical Center (UKC) Tuzla, in the period from June 2016 to December 2019. RESULTS: Overall, smoking was the leading risk factor (65%), followed by hypertension (58%), hyperlipoproteinemia (39%), overweight (33%), positive family burden (30%) and diabetes mellitus (19%). In male patients, the leading risk factor was smoking, rating at 74%, while in female patients - it was hypertension at 67%. In younger groups of patients leading risk factors were smoking and a positive family burden. CONCLUSION: With adequate prevention and treatment measures, a significant reduction in the prevalence of the cardiovascular disease can be achieved, since the risk factors for its development have long been known. Quitting smoking is one of the most effective secondary prevention measure since it reduces the reinfarction risk rate by 50%. Knowledge of coronary risks, as well as success in reducing them, can greatly contribute to patients' overall sense of contentment and significantly raise their self-confidence.

Amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptid in prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction.

We aimed to evaluate levels of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptid (NT-proBNP) in prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure patients. Prospective study on 60 consecutive patients with symptoms and signs of heart failure was performed. Blood samples for NT-proBNP analysis was taken from all test subjects and echocardiography was also done in all of them. According to LVEF value, patients were divided into four groups; those with or=50%. NT-proBNP values correlated with LVEF value. Regression analysis was used to evaluate how well NT-proBNP values predict LVEF. We used Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve calculation to evaluate diagnostic performance of NT-proBNP in estimation of LVEF. Average value of NT-proBNP in test group was 3191.69+/-642.89 pg/ml (p<0.001). Average value of NT-proBNP decreased with higher LVEF categories with significant (p<0.001) and high negative correlation (r= -0,75). Stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis showed that logarithmic value of NT-proBNP was excellent predictor of LVEF value (p<0.05). Model equation based on regression analysis was LVEF=88.645-15.311 x log (NT-proBNP). Predictive model for LVEF yielded from regression analysis had sensitivities of 98% and 81%, specificities of 20% and 90%, positive predictive values of 86% and 78% and negative predictive values of 67% and 92% for predicting patients with LVEF<50% and LVEF<40%, respectively. There was negative linear correlation between NT-proBNP and LVEF. NT-proBNP was excellent predictor of LVEF value (p<0.05).